Dataset Information

Implant-Free, Transtibial, Bone Bridge Fixation for Knee Surgery Including Tibial Spine and Meniscal Root Fixation.

ABSTRACT: Fixation over bone bridge is commonly performed during transosseous pullout knee surgeries. This technique requires the drilling of 2 bony tunnels separately. Herein, we describe our technique in which bone bridge fixation is performed with a single bony tunnel. Our technique is described in 4 simple steps. Step 1: A short accessory tunnel is created from a point at least 1 cm away from the aperture of primary bone tunnel and opening into the lumen of the primary tunnel. Step 2: A shuttle suture (PROLENE) loop is passed from the accessory tunnel to the primary tunnel, and the loop is retrieved out of the primary tunnel using an 18-G epidural needle and arthroscopy probe. Step 3: Complimentary limbs of the pullout suture is then shuttled through the accessory tunnel using shuttle suture loop. Step 4: The knots are tied over the intervening bone bridge. Since the sutures are tied over the bone bridge, it has to be strong enough to provide support. This method of fixation is contraindicated when there is severe osteoporosis or if the tunnels are located in metaphysis. A supplemental video demonstration of the technique is included with this article.

SUBMITTER: Joshi A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7695754 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionRevision total knee arthoplasty often requires modular implants to treat bone defects of varying severity. In some cases, it may not be clear which module size and implant combination (e.g. sleeve and stem) should be chosen for a specific defect. When balancing implant stability and osseointegration against stress-shielding, it is important to choose an appropriate implant combination in order to match the given level of bone loss. Therefore, the necessity of stems in less extensive tibial defects and the advantage of different stems (lengths and stiffnesses) in combination with large metaphyseal sleeves on implant fixation and bone flexibility using a modular tibial revision knee system, were analyzed.Materials and methodsFour different stem combinations for a tibial revision implant (Sigma TC3, DePuy) were compared to an intact bone. Standardized implantation with n = 4 synthetic tibial bones was performed after generating an Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Type T1 bone defect. Axial torques around the longitudinal stem axis and varus-valgus torques were separately applied to the implant. Micromotions of bone and implant were tracked using a digital image correlation system to calculate relative micromotions at the implant-bone-interface and bone deformation.ResultsOverall, using stems reduced the proximal micromotions of tray and sleeve compared to no stem, while reducing bone deformation proximally at the same time, indicating some potential for proximal stress-shielding compared to no stem. The potential for increased proximal stress-shield due to reduced proximal deformation appeared to be greater when using the longer stems. The location of lowest relative micromotions was also more distal when using long stems as opposed to short stems. A short stem (especially a smaller diameter short stem which still achieves diaphyseal fixation) displayed less potential for stress-shielding, but greater bone deformation distal to the tip of the stem than in the natural model.DiscussionIn the case of tibial revision implants with metaphyseal sleeves in a simple fully contained Type I defect, the absence of a stem provides for more natural bone deformation. However, adding a stem reduces overall relative micromotions, while introducing some risk of proximal stress-shielding due to increased diaphyseal fixation. Increasing stem length intensifies this effect. Short stems offered a balance between reduced micromotions and more proximal bone deformation that reduced the potential for stress-shielding when compared to long stems. A short stem with slightly smaller diameter (simulating a less stiff stem which still has diaphyseal fixation) increased the proximal bone deformation, but also tended to increase the bone deformation even further at the distal stem's tip.ConclusionIn conclusion, further investigation should be conducted on fully contained Type I defects and the addition of a stem to offer better initial stability, taking into account stem length (i.e. shorter or more flexible stems) to support metaphyseal fixation and allowing bending found in intact bone. In addition, further study into more extensive tibial defects is required to determine if the stability/micromotion trends observed in this study with stems and sleeves in Type I defects still apply in cases of extensive proximal bone loss.

Dataset Information

Implant-Free, Transtibial, Bone Bridge Fixation for Knee Surgery Including Tibial Spine and Meniscal Root Fixation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets