Dataset Information

Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods and Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of Blastocystis sp. in Stool Specimens.

ABSTRACT: Diagnosis of Blastocystis in stool may be challenging, as microscopic examination and culture-based methods have demonstrated low sensitivity. Molecular detection assays are now available for this enteric parasite, based on "in-house" or commercial-developed techniques. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the performance of (i) two DNA extraction methods (manual versus automated), and (ii) four qPCR assays (three "in-house" and one commercialized), for detection of Blastocystis sp. in human stools. One hundred and forty stools were included, among which 76 were confirmed to be positive for Blastocystis. The manual DNA extraction method allowed for the identification of significantly more positive specimens than the automated method (p < 0.05). In particular, specimens with a low parasite load were negative when DNA was extracted with the automated process. The four qPCR assays also had variable performances, with the commercialized assay being the most sensitive (84%) but the least specific (82%). Overall, for all qPCR assays, the specificity decreased when the sensitivity increased. Blastocystis' subtype, notably the subtype 4, influenced these performances. Our results indicate that the positivity rate for the detection of Blastocystis in stools could be variable according to the DNA extraction method and the qPCR assay used. These pitfalls need to be considered for the selection of method and interpretation of results, particularly considering the search of this intestinal parasite in a donor before fecal microbiota transplantation.

SUBMITTER: Nourrisson C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7696706 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods and Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of Blastocystis sp. in Stool Specimens.

Nourrisson Céline C Brunet Julie J Flori Pierre P Moniot Maxime M Bonnin Virginie V Delbac Frédéric F Poirier Philippe P

Microorganisms 20201111 11

Diagnosis of Blastocystis in stool may be challenging, as microscopic examination and culture-based methods have demonstrated low sensitivity. Molecular detection assays are now available for this enteric parasite, based on "in-house" or commercial-developed techniques. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the performance of (i) two DNA extraction methods (manual versus automated), and (ii) four qPCR assays (three "in-house" and one commercialized), for detection of Blastocy ...[more]

PMID: 33187097

Similar Datasets

Project description:Chlamydia pneumoniae, an important respiratory pathogen, is difficult to culture, and detection rates by conventional PCRs vary considerably. A new quantitative ompA-based real-time PCR assay based on TaqMan technology for detection of C. pneumoniae in respiratory samples is described, and its performance in terms of sensitivity and reproducibility is compared with those of four published conventional PCRs (one single-step PCR targeting a cloned PstI fragment; two nested PCRs, one targeting the 16S rRNA gene followed by hybridization and the other targeting the ompA gene; and a touchdown enzyme time-release [TETR] PCR also targeting the 16S rRNA gene). Both ompA-based PCRs showed the best analytical sensitivity. All five assays could detect even lower target levels from spiked sputum, with the 16S rRNA assays performing better than the ompA-based nested PCR (10(-6) inclusion-forming units [IFU] were detected in four of four and two of four replicates by the 16S rRNA TETR PCR and the 16S rRNA nested PCR, respectively). In general, the ompA-based real-time protocol produced the most consistent positive results for all replicates tested down to 10(-6) IFU. Eight of 45 patient sputum specimens (18%) were C. pneumoniae DNA positive in at least one of four replicates tested by at least one assay. Without taking into consideration the analytical sensitivity or the reproducibility of the test results, the numbers of C. pneumoniae DNA-positive sputum specimens (n = 8) were four, three, two, two, and one for the 16S rRNA TETR assay, the PstI-based single-step PCR, the ompA-based real-time PCR, the ompA-based nested touchdown PCR, and the 16S rRNA-based nested PCR, respectively. However, the overall rate of concordance of positive results was low. Only one cell culture-positive sputum specimen was positive by four of five assays (14 of 16 replicates; mean cycle threshold value, 25; 10(8) particles/ml of sputum). Thirty-seven specimens were C. pneumoniae negative by all five assays for all replicates tested, as were all negative controls (n = 65 to 100 per testing panel). No PCR inhibitors were detected by real-time PCR or by the 16S rRNA-based nested assay. We confirm that the analytical sensitivity of an assay for the detection of C. pneumoniae does not necessarily predict its ability to detect its target in sputum. A quantitative, fast, and easy-to-handle diagnostic approach such as the ompA-based real-time TaqMan PCR described here might improve the detection of C. pneumoniae in respiratory samples.

Dataset Information

Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods and Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of Blastocystis sp. in Stool Specimens.

Publications

Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods and Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of <i>Blastocystis</i> sp. in Stool Specimens.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets