Dataset Information

Clinical T category for lung cancer staging: A pragmatic approach for real-world practice.

ABSTRACT: Background: To determine which components should be measured and which window settings are appropriate for computerized tomography (CT) size measurements of lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and to explore interobserver agreement and accuracy according to the eighth edition of TNM staging.

Methods: A total of 165 patients with surgically resected lung ADC earlier than stage 3A were included in this study. One radiologist and two pulmonologists independently measured the total and solid sizes of components of tumors on different window settings and assessed solidity. CT measurements were compared with pathologic size measurements.

Results: In categorizing solidity, 25% of the cases showed discordant results among observers. Measuring the total size of a lung adenocarcinoma predicted pathologic invasive components to a degree similar to measuring the solid component. Lung windows were more accurate (intraclass correlation [ICC] = 0.65-0.81) than mediastinal windows (ICC = 0.20-0.72) at predicting pathologic invasive components, especially in a part-solid nodule. Interobserver agreements for measurement of solid components were good with little significant difference (lung windows, ICC = 0.89; mediastinal windows, ICC = 0.91). A high level of interobserver agreement was seen between the radiologist and pulmonologists and between residents (from the division of pulmonology and critical care) versus a fellow (from the division of pulmonology and critical care) on different windows.

Conclusions: A considerable percentage (25%) of discrepancies was encountered in categorizing the solidity of lesions, which may decrease the accuracy of measurements. Lung window settings may be superior to mediastinal windows for measuring lung ADCs, with comparable interobserver agreement and moderate accuracy for predicting pathologic invasive components.

Key points: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: Lung window settings are better for evaluating part-solid lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), with comparable interobserver agreement and moderate accuracy for predicting pathologic invasive components. The considerable percentage (25%) of discrepancies in categorizing solidity of the lesions may also have decreased the accuracy of measurements.

What this study adds: For accurate measurement and categorization of lung ADC, robust quantitative analysis is needed rather than a simple visual assessment.

SUBMITTER: Choi Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7705618 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinical T category for lung cancer staging: A pragmatic approach for real-world practice.

Choi Yeonu Y Kim Sun-Hyung SH Kim Ki Hwan KH Choi Yeonseok Y Park Sung Goo SG Sohn Insuk I Kim Hye Seung HS Um Sang-Won SW Lee Ho Yun HY

Thoracic cancer 20201019 12

<h4>Background</h4>To determine which components should be measured and which window settings are appropriate for computerized tomography (CT) size measurements of lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and to explore interobserver agreement and accuracy according to the eighth edition of TNM staging.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 165 patients with surgically resected lung ADC earlier than stage 3A were included in this study. One radiologist and two pulmonologists independently measured the total and solid size ...[more]

PMID: 33075213

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThis study aimed to comprehensively analyze the characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients initially diagnosed with brain metastases (BMs) in real-world practice.MethodsWe enrolled NSCLC patients initially diagnosed with BMs between Jan 2004 and Jan 2018 in our institution. Patient demographics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were then analyzed. Brain localized treatment (BLT) included early brain radiotherapy (EBR), deferred brain radiotherapy (DBR), and surgery.ResultsA total of 954 patients were identified. Concerning initial treatment, 525 patients (55.0%) received systemic medication (SM)+BLT, 400 patients (41.9%) received SM only, and 29 patients received BLT only (3.0%). SM+BLT cohort was associated with longer median overall survival (mOS) than the SM only and the BLT only cohorts both in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative/unknown patients (15.3 months, 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.2-16.4; 11.1 months, 9.0-13.2; 7.0 months, 5.4-8.6; p<0.001) and in EGFR/ALK-positive patients (33.7 months, 28.5-38.9; 22.1 months, 17.8-26.4; 4.0 months, 3.6-4.4; p < 0.001). As for timing of radiotherapy, SM+EBR (14.1 months, 12.7-15.5) was associated with inferior mOS than SM+DBR (19.4 months, 14.2-24.6) in EGFR/ALK-negative/unknown patients. No significant difference was found in EGFR/ALK-positive patients (28.3 months, 19.1-37.5; 33.3 months, 28.1-38.5). Patients in the EGFR/ALK-negative/unknown cohort treated with first-line pemetrexed with platinum (PP) (15.8 months, 14.0-17.6, p<0.001) had longer mOS than those received non-PP regimens (13.1 months, 11.6-14.6). However, no difference was observed among EGFR/ALK-positive patients who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (29.5 months, 21.1-37.9; p = 0.140), PP (27.2 months, 21.6-32.8) and non-PP regimens (25.0 months, 16.0-34.0).ConclusionsOur study confirmed that the use of SM+BLT is associated with superior mOS than those treated with SM only and BLT only. SM+DBR might be a better radiotherapeutic strategy for this patient population. EGFR/ALK-negative/unknown patients showed a survival benefit with PP treatment.

Dataset Information

Clinical T category for lung cancer staging: A pragmatic approach for real-world practice.

Publications

Clinical T category for lung cancer staging: A pragmatic approach for real-world practice.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets