Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
Methods: Using a custom-designed 156 gene panel, we analyzed 47 endometrial cancers and matching non-tumor tissue. Variants were annotated for pathogenicity and medical records were reviewed for the clinicopathologic variables. Using molecular characteristics, tumors were classified into four subgroups. Group 1 included patients with?>?570 unfiltered somatic variants,?>?9 cytosine to adenine nucleotide substitutions per sample, and?
Results: Endometrioid endometrial cancers had more candidate variants of potential pathogenic interest (median 6 IQR 4.13 vs. 2 IQR 2.3; p?
Conclusions: Targeted sequencing can predict the presence of POLE mutations based on the tumor mutational burden. However, targeted sequencing alone is inadequate to classify endometrial cancers into molecular subgroups identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas.
SUBMITTER: Miller EM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7706212 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Miller Eirwen M EM Patterson Nicole E NE Gressel Gregory M GM Karabakhtsian Rouzan G RG Bejerano-Sagie Michal M Ravi Nivedita N Maslov Alexander A Quispe-Tintaya Wilber W Wang Tao T Lin Juan J Smith Harriet O HO Goldberg Gary L GL Kuo Dennis Y S DYS Montagna Cristina C
BMC medical genomics 20201130 1
<h4>Background</h4>The Cancer Genome Atlas identified four molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer with survival differences based on whole genome, transcriptomic, and proteomic characterization. Clinically accessible algorithms that reproduce this data are needed. Our aim was to determine if targeted sequencing alone allowed for molecular classification of endometrial cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>Using a custom-designed 156 gene panel, we analyzed 47 endometrial cancers and matching non-tumor tissu ...[more]