Dataset Information

Cost utility analysis of cryopreserved amniotic membrane versus topical cyclosporine for the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye syndrome.

ABSTRACT: Background: The purpose is to perform a cost effectiveness analysis amniotic membrane vs. topical medications in the use of treating dry eye disease. A cost effectiveness analysis comparing amniotic membrane?+?other topical medications to topical cyclosporine A?+?other topical medications was evaluated using accepted decision tree modeling software.

Methods: TreeAge Pro 2019 software was used to evaluate the base case costs over a one year timeframe. Sensitivity analysis was performed on those variables which had the greatest effect on choosing one therapy versus the other based on cost. Monte Carlo simulation was run 1,000 times to determine the most effective, least costly alternative. Costs were evaluated from a societal level (direct?+?indirect). Quality of life utility scores were evaluated using known time tradeoffs from prior studies (scale 0-1; with 1 being perfect vision).

Results: Over a one year timeframe, the base case demonstrated that amniotic membrane?+?topical medications was the less expensive alternative and provided for incremental utilities versus topical cyclosporine?+?other medications (Cost/utility: $18,275/0.78 vs. $20,740/0.74). If examining direct costs only, topical cyclosporine was the least expensive option over a one year timeframe: $4,112 vs. $10,300. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that in order for topical cyclosporine to be the less expensive alternative the following variables would need to be:??79% of amniotic membrane implants would need to be re-implanted at month 4 (for whatever reason);?>?$2677 per amniotic membrane implant procedure (Medicare reimbursement rate);?>?96% positive response to topical cyclosporine A at month 4;?>?58% positive response to topical cyclosporine A at month 6 and;?
Conclusion: Based on improved outcomes using amniotic membrane, patient productivity was improved resulting in lower societal costs (less days lost from work). When considering the untoward effects of dry eye disease on societal costs, an improvement of the dry eye disease condition was accomplished most often with amniotic membrane.

SUBMITTER: Voigt J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7709448 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Cost utility analysis of cryopreserved amniotic membrane versus topical cyclosporine for the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye syndrome.

Voigt Jeffrey J

Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E 20201201 1

<h4>Background</h4>The purpose is to perform a cost effectiveness analysis amniotic membrane vs. topical medications in the use of treating dry eye disease. A cost effectiveness analysis comparing amniotic membrane + other topical medications to topical cyclosporine A + other topical medications was evaluated using accepted decision tree modeling software.<h4>Methods</h4>TreeAge Pro 2019 software was used to evaluate the base case costs over a one year timeframe. Sensitivity analysis was perform ...[more]

PMID: 33292325

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceDry eye disease (DED) is a common public health problem with significant impact on vision-related quality of life and well-being of patients. Medications with rapid onset of action and a good tolerability profile remain an unmet need.ObjectiveTo assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a water-free cyclosporine ophthalmic solution, 0.1% (CyclASol [Novaliq GmbH]), applied twice daily in DED compared with vehicle.Design, setting, and participantsCyclASol for the Treatment of Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease (ESSENCE-2) was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled clinical study conducted from December 5, 2020, to October 8, 2021. Following a 14-day run-in period with an artificial tear administered 2 times per day, eligible participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the treatment groups. Patients with moderate to severe DED were included in the study.InterventionsCyclosporine solution vs vehicle administered 2 times per day for 29 days.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end points were changes from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS; 0-15 National Eye Institute scale) and in dryness score (0-100 visual analog scale) at day 29. Conjunctival staining, central corneal fluorescein staining, and tCFS responders were also assessed.ResultsA total of 834 study participants were randomly assigned to cyclosporine (423 [50.7%]) or vehicle (411 [49.3%]) groups at 27 sites. Participants had a mean (SD) age of 57.1 (15.8) years, and 609 (73.0%) were female individuals. The majority of participants self-identified in the following race categories: 79 Asian (9.5 %), 108 Black (12.9%), and 635 White (76.1%). Participants treated with cyclosporine solution had greater improvement in tCFS (-4.0 grades) than the vehicle group (-3.6 grades) at day 29 (change [∆] = -0.4; 95% CI, -0.8 to 0; P = .03). The dryness score showed treatment benefits from baseline in both groups: -12.2 points for cyclosporine and -13.6 points for vehicle (∆ = 1.4; 95% CI, -1.8 to 4.6; P = .38). In the cyclosporine group, 293 participants (71.6%) achieved clinically meaningful reductions of 3 grades or higher in tCFS vs 236 (59.7%) in the vehicle group (∆ = 12.6%; 95% CI, 6.0%-19.3%; P < .001). These responders showed greater improvement in symptoms at day 29 including dryness (∆ = -4.6; 95% CI, -8.0 to -1.2; P = .007) and blurred vision (Δ = -3.5; 95% CI, -6.6 to -4.0; P = .03) compared with nonresponders.Conclusions and relevanceThe ESSENCE-2 trial confirmed that treatment with a water-free cyclosporine solution, 0.1%, results in early therapeutic effects on the ocular surface compared with vehicle. The responder analyses suggest that the effect is clinically meaningful in 71.6% of participants in the cyclosporine group.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04523129.

Project description:ImportanceThyroid eye disease (TED) results in varying degrees of proptosis and diplopia negatively affecting quality of life (QoL), producing possibly substantial visual changes, disfigurement, and disability.ObjectiveTo determine the association of varying TED severities with QoL in a non-TED population by assessing health state utility scores.Design, setting, and participantsThis qualitative study, conducted from April 20, 2020, to April 29, 2021, assessed health states for active, moderate-severe TED, and values were elicited using time trade-off methods. Six health states of varying severity were determined from 2 placebo-controlled clinical trials (171 patients with TED and clinical activity score ≥4, ±diplopia/proptosis) and refined using interviews with US patients with TED (n = 6). Each health state description was validated by interviews with additional TED patient advocates (n = 3) and physician experts (n = 3). Health state descriptions and a QOL questionnaire were piloted and administered to a general population. Visual analog scales (VASs) were also administered to detect concurrence of the findings.Main outcomes and measuresTED health state utility scores and whether they differ from one another were assessed using Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis, pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum, and paired t tests.ResultsA total of 111 participants completed time trade-off interviews. The mean (SD) utility value was 0.44 (0.34). The lowest (worse) mean utility value was observed in the most severe disease state (constant diplopia/large proptosis) with 0.30 (95% CI, 0.24-0.36), followed by constant diplopia/small proptosis (0.34; 95% CI, 0.29-0.40), intermittent or inconstant diplopia/large proptosis (0.43; 95% CI, 0.36-0.49), no diplopia/large proptosis (0.46; 95% CI, 0.40-0.52), and intermittent or inconstant diplopia/small proptosis (0.52; 95% CI, 0.45-0.58). The highest (best) mean value, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.54-0.67), was observed for the least severe disease state (no diplopia/small proptosis).Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that patients with active, moderate-severe TED may have substantial disutility, with increasing severity of proptosis/diplopia more likely to have detrimental associations with QoL. These health state scores may provide a baseline for determining QoL improvement in these TED health states (utility gains) treated with new therapies.

Dataset Information

Cost utility analysis of cryopreserved amniotic membrane versus topical cyclosporine for the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye syndrome.

Publications

Cost utility analysis of cryopreserved amniotic membrane versus topical cyclosporine for the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye syndrome.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets