Dataset Information

A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Etelcalcetide in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (the DUET Trial).

ABSTRACT: Introduction: The clinical trial on the Development of a treatment strategy for chronic kidney disease?mineral and bone disorder by a mUltilateral mechanism of ETelcalcetide hydrochloride, or the DUET trial, was designed to determine the efficacy of etelcalcetide, an intravenous calcimimetic, for control of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT).

Methods: Eligible SHPT maintenance hemodialysis patients (n = 124) were randomized (1:1:1) for inclusion in the DUET trial, a 12-week, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group study (jRCTs041180108), and assigned to either an etelcalcetide + active vitamin D group (group E+D), an etelcalcetide + oral calcium preparation group (group E+Ca), or a control group (group C). The primary endpoint was number of patients with a 50% reduction from baseline of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels, and iPTH levels ? 240 pg/mL at 12 weeks after start of the trial.

Results: The proportion of patients reaching the primary endpoint (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 90.0% (76.3%-97.2%) in group E+D, 56.8% (39.5%-72.9%) in group E+Ca, and 19.5% (8.8%-34.9%) in group C. Etelcalcetide treatment led to a significant increase in the number of patients achieving the endpoint (odds ratio, 13.4; 95% CI, 5.10-35.3) on logistic regression analysis, with iPTH, corrected serum calcium, and phosphate at baseline as covariates. Significantly more patients achieved the endpoint in group E+D compared with group E+Ca (odds ratio, 6.35; 95% CI, 1.79-22.48). There were fewer hypocalcemic visits in group E+D compared with group E+Ca (P = 0.018), yet the former group was prone to hyperphosphatemia.

Conclusion: Etelcalcetide showed good control of iPTH for maintenance hemodialysis patients with SHPT. Active vitamin D was useful in correcting hypocalcemia, but the oral calcium preparation was superior for suppression of hyperphosphatemia.

SUBMITTER: Itano Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7710846 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Etelcalcetide in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (the DUET Trial).

Itano Yuya Y Kato Sawako S Tsuboi Masato M Kasuga Hirotake H Tsuruta Yoshinari Y Sato Fumihiko F Hishida Manabu M Ishimoto Takuji T Kosugi Tomoki T Ando Masahiko M Kuwatsuka Yachiyo Y Maruyama Shoichi S

Kidney international reports 20200918 12

<h4>Introduction</h4>The clinical trial on the Development of a treatment strategy for chronic kidney disease‒mineral and bone disorder by a mUltilateral mechanism of ETelcalcetide hydrochloride, or the DUET trial, was designed to determine the efficacy of etelcalcetide, an intravenous calcimimetic, for control of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT).<h4>Methods</h4>Eligible SHPT maintenance hemodialysis patients (n = 124) were randomized (1:1:1) for inclusion in the DUET trial, a 12-week, multi ...[more]

PMID: 33305109

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCalcimimetics have been shown to be effective and safe therapies for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT), a serious complication of disordered mineral metabolism associated with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. Etelcalcetide, a recently approved intravenous calcimimetic, reduces serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, phosphorus, and fibroblast growth factor-23 concentrations. Here we report the first integrated safety profile of etelcalcetide using pooled data from five pivotal clinical trials.MethodsThis analysis included data from patients receiving hemodialysis with moderate to severe sHPT enrolled in two randomized, placebo-controlled trials; a randomized active-controlled (with cinacalcet) trial; and two single-arm, open-label extension trials. Patients initially received etelcalcetide intravenously 5 mg three times weekly (TIW) after hemodialysis; with potential dose increases of 2.5 or 5 mg at 4-week intervals to a maximum dose of 15 mg TIW, depending on serum PTH and calcium levels. The nature, frequency, and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and changes in laboratory parameters were assessed.ResultsOverall, we evaluated 1023 patients from the placebo-controlled trials, 683 from the active-controlled trial, and 1299 from open-label extensions. The frequency and nature of common treatment-emergent AEs reported for the etelcalcetide arm were consistent among the placebo-controlled and active-controlled trials. The most common AEs were those related to mineral metabolism (decreased blood calcium, hypophosphatemia, muscle spasms) or gastrointestinal abnormalities (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting). Hypocalcemia leading to discontinuation of either calcimimetic was experienced in ≤ 1% of patients.ConclusionsThis integrated safety assessment of etelcalcetide across placebo- and active-controlled trials showed an overall favorable risk/benefit profile, with safety similar to that of cinacalcet. Consistent with its mechanism of action, the most important risks associated with etelcalcetide were serum calcium reductions and hypocalcemia-related AEs; no new safety findings were identified in the pooled long-term extension trials.

Project description:Background and objectivesVitamin D receptor activators and calcimimetics (calcium-sensing receptor agonists) are two major options for medical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. A higher serum calcification propensity (a shorter T50 value) is a novel surrogate marker of calcification stress and mortality in patients with CKD. We tested a hypothesis that a calcimimetic agent etelcalcetide is more effective in increasing T50 value than a vitamin D receptor activator maxacalcitol.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsA randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded end point trial with active control was conducted in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing hemodialysis in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous etelcalcetide 5 mg thrice weekly (etelcalcetide group) or intravenous maxacalcitol 5 or 10 µg thrice weekly (maxacalcitol group). The primary, secondary, and tertiary outcomes were changes in T50 value, handgrip strength, and score of the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System from baseline to 12 months, respectively.ResultsIn total, 425 patients from 23 dialysis centers were screened for eligibility, 326 patients were randomized (etelcalcetide, n=167; control, n=159), and 321 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (median age, 66 years; 113 women [35%]). The median (interquartile range) of T50 value was changed from 116 minutes (interquartile range, 90-151) to 131 minutes (interquartile range, 102-176) in the maxacalcitol group, whereas it was changed from 123 minutes (interquartile range, 98-174) to 166 minutes (interquartile range, 127-218) in the etelcalcetide group. The increase in T50 value was significantly greater in the etelcalcetide group (difference in change, 20 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 7 to 34 minutes; P=0.004). No significant between-group difference was found in the change in handgrip strength or in the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System score.ConclusionsEtelcalcetide was more effective in increasing T50 value than maxacalcitol among patients on hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism. There was no difference in handgrip strength or cognition between the two drugs.Clinical trial registry name and registration numberVICTORY; UMIN000030636 and jRCTs051180156.

Project description:ImportancePatients with chronic kidney disease have impaired vitamin D activation and elevated cardiovascular risk. Observational studies in patients treated with hemodialysis showed that the use of active vitamin D sterols was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality, regardless of parathyroid hormone levels.ObjectiveTo determine whether vitamin D receptor activators reduce cardiovascular events and mortality in patients without secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing hemodialysis.Design, setting, and participantsRandomized, open-label, blinded end point multicenter study of 1289 patients in 207 dialysis centers in Japan. The study included 976 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis with serum intact parathyroid hormone levels less than or equal to 180 pg/mL. The first and last participants were enrolled on August 18, 2008, and January 26, 2011, respectively. The final date of follow-up was April 4, 2015.InterventionsTreatment with 0.5 μg of oral alfacalcidol per day (intervention group; n = 495) vs treatment without vitamin D receptor activators (control group; n = 481).Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was a composite measure of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarctions, hospitalizations for congestive heart failure, stroke, aortic dissection/rupture, amputation of lower limb due to ischemia, and cardiac sudden death; coronary revascularization; and leg artery revascularization during 48 months of follow-up. The secondary outcome was all-cause death.ResultsAmong 976 patients who were randomized from 108 dialysis centers, 964 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (median age, 65 years; 386 women [40.0%]), and 944 (97.9%) completed the trial. During follow-up (median, 4.0 years), the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular events occurred in 103 of 488 patients (21.1%) in the intervention group and 85 of 476 patients (17.9%) in the control group (absolute difference, 3.25% [95% CI, -1.75% to 8.24%]; hazard ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.94-1.67]; P = .13). There was no significant difference in the secondary outcome of all-cause mortality between the groups (18.2% vs 16.8%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.83-1.52]; P = .46). Of the 488 participants in the intervention group, 199 (40.8%) experienced serious adverse events that were classified as cardiovascular, 64 (13.1%) experienced adverse events classified as infection, and 22 (4.5%) experienced malignancy-related serious adverse events. Of 476 participants in the control group, 191 (40.1%) experienced cardiovascular-related serious adverse events, 63 (13.2%) experienced infection-related serious adverse events, and 21 (4.4%) experienced malignancy-related adverse events.Conclusions and relevanceAmong patients without secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, oral alfacalcidol compared with usual care did not reduce the risk of a composite measure of select cardiovascular events. These findings do not support the use of vitamin D receptor activators for patients such as these.Trial registrationUMIN-CTR Identifier: UMIN000001194.

Project description:IntroductionCalcimimetics improve parameters of secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) but are mostly initiated when patients have severe disease, potentially limiting effectiveness. We evaluated the effects of etelcalcetide on lowering intact parathyroid hormone, calcium, and phosphate at different disease severity levels.MethodsThis analysis examined data from 2 parallel, phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, 26-week trials conducted in 1023 adult (≥18 years old) patients with sHPT on maintenance hemodialysis. Etelcalcetide effects by baseline intact parathyroid hormone stratum (<600, 600-1000, and >1000 ng/l) on mean percentage change in intact parathyroid hormone; changes in calcium and phosphate; and achieving serum intact parathyroid hormone ≤300 ng/l, phosphate <1.78 mmol/l, and both combined, were assessed.ResultsEtelcalcetide reduced serum intact parathyroid hormone by a similar percentage across baseline strata. A similar proportion achieved >30% intact parathyroid hormone reduction across strata for the etelcalcetide arms. Parathyroid hormone increased modestly in each placebo-group stratum, most prominently in the lowest stratum. Serum calcium and phosphate concentrations decreased across strata in etelcalcetide-treated patients, with the most pronounced reductions in patients with highest baseline parathyroid hormone. However, the proportion of patients achieving parathyroid hormone, phosphate, and both targets was highest in the lowest baseline parathyroid hormone stratum, where etelcalcetide dose requirements were lowest. Etelcalcetide dose requirement was lowest among patients in the lowest intact parathyroid hormone stratum.ConclusionEtelcalcetide effectively lowered serum intact parathyroid hormone, calcium, and phosphate, irrespective of the severity of secondary hyperparathyroidism. The ability to achieve target goals was greatest, and dose requirement smallest, when etelcalcetide was initiated among patients with the lowest level of disease severity.

Dataset Information

A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Etelcalcetide in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (the DUET Trial).

Publications

A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Etelcalcetide in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (the DUET Trial).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets