Radiological screening of maternal periodontitis for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Heo JS
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7718227 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Radiological screening of maternal periodontitis for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
Heo Ju Sun JS Ahn Ki Hoon KH Park Jung Soo JS
Scientific reports 20201204 1
It is well known that periodontitis, diagnosed mainly by periodontal probing, is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, periodontal probing is time-consuming, highly discomforting, inaccurate, and invasive. We aimed to assess whether periodontitis severity based on radiological staging in accordance with the 2017 new consensus classification was related to adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. The medical records of 165 mothers who underwent panoramic radiography within 5 years ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Chlamydial trachomatis infection has been associated with adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes such as premature rupture of membranes, preterm birth, low birth weight, conjunctivitis, and pneumonia in infants. This review evaluates existing literature to determine potential benefits of antenatal screening and treatment of C. trachomatis in preventing adverse outcomes. A literature search revealed 1824 studies with 156 full-text articles reviewed. Fifteen studies were selected after fulfilling inclusion criteria. Eight studies focused on chlamydial screening and treatment to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes such as premature rupture of membranes, preterm birth, low birth weight, growth restriction leading to small for gestational age infants, and neonatal death. Seven studies focused on the effects of chlamydial screening and treatment on adverse infant outcomes such as chlamydial infection including positive mucosal cultures, pneumonia, and conjunctivitis. Given the heterogeneity of those studies, this focused review was exclusively qualitative in nature. When viewed collectively, 13 of 15 studies provided some degree of support that antenatal chlamydial screening and treatment interventions may lead to decreased adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes. However, notable limitations of these individual studies also highlight the need for further, updated research in this area, particularly from low and middle-income settings.
| S-EPMC8222807 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAdolescents have physical, social and psychological characteristics that are different from adults. Adolescent pregnancy results in pregnancy and childbirth complications- an area neglected in developing countries like Ethiopia. This study, therefore, was conducted to assess the adverse neonatal outcomes of adolescent pregnancy in Northwest Ethiopia.MethodsInstitutional-based study was conducted in East Gojjam zone, Northwest Ethiopia. A total of 374 adolescent (15-19 years) and 760 adult (20-34 years) women were included in this study. Data were collected among women who came to randomly selected health facilities in East Gojjam zone. Data were collected by trained research assistants using a structured data collection questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and Student's t-tests were utilized. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were employed to adjust for confounding factors of adverse neonatal outcomes. Statistical significance was declared when the p-value was less than 0.05.ResultsHigher proportion of adolescent than adult women were from rural area (57.2% vs 44.7%), were not married (5.1% vs 1.7%), were pregnant for the first time (91.7% vs 34.1%), didn't attend antenatal care (ANC) follow-up (12% vs 4.5%), and had late initiation of ANC follow-up. After adjusting for known confounding factors, the odds of low birth weight (LBW) was higher among adolescents than adult women (AOR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.36, 3.36, p-value = 0.001). Similarly, the odds of preterm birth was higher among adolescents than adult women (AOR 1.65; 95% CI, 1.09, 2.49, p-value = 0.017). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of low Apgar score at first and five minutes after birth and neonatal Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission between babies born from adolescent and adult women.ConclusionsAdolescent women were less likely to receive ANC service. Babies born from adolescent women are at higher odds of adverse neonatal outcomes like LBW and preterm birth than babies born from adult women. Use of community- and health facility-based intervention programs that can prevent adolescent pregnancy and reduce adverse neonatal outcomes among adolescent girls is recommended.
| S-EPMC6564016 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe current study aimed to estimate the prevalence of alcohol use identified as a risk factor during pregnancies by the antenatal care providers, resulting in live births in British Columbia (BC) and to examine associations between alcohol use, adverse neonatal outcomes, and pregnancy complications.MethodsThis population-based cross-sectional study utilized linked obstetrical and neonatal records within the BC Perinatal Data Registry (BCPDR), for deliveries that were discharged between January 1, 2015 and March 31, 2018. The main outcome measures were alcohol use identified as a risk factor during pregnancy, associated maternal characteristics, pregnancy complications, and adverse neonatal outcomes. Estimates for the period and fiscal year prevalence were calculated. Chi-square tests were used to compare adverse neonatal outcomes and pregnancy complications by alcohol use during pregnancy identified as a risk factor. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between alcohol use identified as a risk factor during pregnancy and adverse neonatal outcomes and pregnancy complications, after adjusting for identified risk factors.ResultsA total of 144,779 linked records within the BCPDR were examined. The period prevalence of alcohol use during pregnancy identified as a risk factor was estimated to be 1.1% and yearly prevalence was 1.1, 1.1, 1.3 and 0.9% from the 2014/2015 to 2017/2018 fiscal years, respectively. Alcohol use identified as a risk factor was associated with younger maternal age, fewer antenatal visits, being primiparous, a history of mental illness, substance use and smoking. Neonates with alcohol use during pregnancy identified as a risk factor had greater odds of being diagnosed with: "low birth weight (1000-2499g)" (ICD-10: P07.1; aOR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.53), "other respiration distress of newborn" (ICD-10: P22.8; aOR = 2.57; 95% CI: 1.52, 4.07), "neonatal difficulty in breastfeeding" (ICD-10: P92.5; aOR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.92) and "feeding problems, unspecified" (ICD-10: P92.9; aOR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.31, 3.09).ConclusionsThe prevalence of alcohol use during pregnancy identified as a risk factor was comparable to previous estimates within the BCPDR. Identified prenatal alcohol exposure was associated with notable differences in maternal and neonatal characteristics and adverse neonatal outcomes. More consistent, thorough screening and prevention efforts targeting alcohol use in pregnancy are urgently needed in Canada.
| S-EPMC7821646 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 may be associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancy, but there are few controlled data to quantify the magnitude of these risks or to characterize the epidemiology and risk factors.ObjectiveThis study aimed to quantify the associations of coronavirus disease 2019 with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancy and to characterize the epidemiology and risk factors.Study designWe performed a matched case-control study of pregnant patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 cases who delivered between 16 and 41 weeks' gestation from March 11 to June 11, 2020. Uninfected pregnant women (controls) were matched to coronavirus disease 2019 cases on a 2:1 ratio based on delivery date. Maternal demographic characteristics, coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms, laboratory evaluations, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes, and clinical management were chart abstracted. The primary outcomes included (1) a composite of adverse maternal outcome, defined as preeclampsia, venous thromboembolism, antepartum admission, maternal intensive care unit admission, need for mechanical ventilation, supplemental oxygen, or maternal death, and (2) a composite of adverse neonatal outcome, defined as respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, 5-minute Apgar score of <5, persistent category 2 fetal heart rate tracing despite intrauterine resuscitation, or neonatal death. To quantify the associations between exposure to mild and severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed using conditional logistic regression (to account for matching), with matched-pair odds ratio and 95% confidence interval based on 1000 bias-corrected bootstrap resampling as the effect measure. Associations were adjusted for potential confounders.ResultsA total of 61 confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 cases were enrolled during the study period (mild disease, n=54 [88.5%]; severe disease, n=6 [9.8%]; critical disease, n=1 [1.6%]). The odds of adverse composite maternal outcome were 3.4 times higher among cases than controls (18.0% vs 8.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-13.4). The odds of adverse composite neonatal outcome were 1.7 times higher in the case group than to the control group (18.0% vs 13.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-4.8). Stratified analyses by disease severity indicated that the morbidity associated with coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy was largely driven by the severe or critical disease phenotype. Major risk factors for associated morbidity were black and Hispanic race, advanced maternal age, medical comorbidities, and antepartum admissions related to coronavirus disease 2019.ConclusionCoronavirus disease 2019 during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, an association that is primarily driven by morbidity associated with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019. Black and Hispanic race, obesity, advanced maternal age, medical comorbidities, and antepartum admissions related to coronavirus disease 2019 are risk factors for associated morbidity.
| S-EPMC7518835 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:Pregnancy outcomes might be affected by unintended pregnancy such as preeclampsia, preterm birth, cesarean section and low birth weight. The aim of the present study is to assess the association between unintended pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. Methods:This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 103 hospitals in Tehran, Iran, in July 2015. The data were collected by trained midwives. The interested independent variable was unintended pregnancy and also preeclampsia, weight gain during pregnancy, preterm birth, cesarean section and low birth weight were considered as interested outcomes, and the association of unintended pregnancy and interested outcomes were assessed. Results:Out of 5152 cases, 1021 (19.82%) cases were unintended pregnancy. There was no significant relationship between unintended pregnancy and low birth weight (adjusted OR?0.67, 95% CI 0.403-1.13, P?=?0.138), the risk of preterm birth (adjusted OR?1.15, 95% CI 0.850-1.57, P?=?0.351) and preeclampsia (adjusted OR?1.21, 95% CI 0.846-1.75, P?=?0.289). The results of multiple linear regression model showed that the mean difference between two groups was 0.70 kg, and weight gain mean in unintended pregnant women significantly was lower than unintended pregnant women (mean difference?=?0.70, 95% CI 0.14-1.26 kg, P?=?0.014). Multiple logistic regression showed that after adjusting confounders, there was a significant relationship between unintended pregnancy and cesarean section, and the adjusted odds of cesarean section in unintended pregnant women was 1.32 times of intended pregnant women (95% CI 1.07-1.63, P?=?0.009). Conclusion:We found higher risk of cesarean section and inappropriate weight gain during pregnancy as adverse outcomes of unintended pregnancy in adjusted model.
| S-EPMC6430264 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundVegetarian diets are becoming increasingly popular in the USA. Limited research has examined the health consequences of vegetarian diets during pregnancy. We comprehensively examined associations of vegetarianism during pregnancy with maternal and neonatal outcomes.MethodsWe used data from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons, a prospective multi-site cohort of 1948 low-risk pregnant women of four races/ethnicities (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander) in the USA (2009-2013). Vegetarianism was self-reported and also defined based on dietary patterns measured using a self-administered first-trimester food-frequency questionnaire (full [lacto-ovo and vegan], pesco-, semi- and non-vegetarians). Neonatal outcomes included birthweight and neonatal anthropometric measures, small for gestational age, small for gestational age with neonatal morbidity and preterm delivery. Maternal outcomes included gestational weight gain, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational anaemia.ResultsNinety-nine (6.2%) women self-reported being vegetarian. The diet-based definition identified 32 (2.0%) full vegetarians, 7 (0.6%) pesco-vegetarians and 301 (17.6%) semi-vegetarians. Neonates of diet-based full vegetarians had higher odds of being small for gestational age [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) = 2.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 6.21], but not of being small for gestational age with a postnatal morbidity. Full vegetarians had marginally increased the odds of inadequate second-trimester gestational weight gain (ORadj = 2.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.95, 5.27).ConclusionVegetarian diets during pregnancy were associated with constitutionally smaller neonatal size, potentially via the mothers' reduced gestational weight gain. Notably, vegetarianism was not associated with small-for-gestational-age-related morbidities or other adverse maternal outcomes.
| S-EPMC7938506 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLithium is prescribed during pregnancy, but there is limited information about pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following in utero exposure. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the associations between lithium use and adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.MethodsThis population-based cohort study examined associations between maternal lithium use and major adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes via inverse probability weighted propensity score regression models.ResultsOf 854,017 women included in this study, 434 (0.05%) used lithium during pregnancy. Among pre-specified primary outcomes, lithium use during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth (8.7% vs 3.0%; adjusted relative risk [aRR] 2.64 95% CI 1.82, 3.82) and birth of a large for gestational age infant (9.0% vs 3.5%; aRR 2.64 95% CI 1.91, 3.66), but not preeclampsia nor birth of a small for gestational age infant. Among secondary outcomes, lithium use was associated with an increased risk of cardiac malformations (2.1% vs 0.8%; aRR 3.17 95% CI 1.64, 6.13). In an analysis restricted to pregnant women with a diagnosed psychiatric illness (n=9552), associations remained between lithium and spontaneous preterm birth, birth of a large for gestational age infant, and cardiovascular malformations; and a positive association with neonatal hypoglycaemia was also found. These associations were also apparent in a further analysis comparing women who continued lithium treatment during pregnancy to those who discontinued prior to pregnancy.ConclusionsLithium use during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth and other adverse neonatal outcomes. These potential risks must be balanced against the important benefit of treatment and should be used to guide shared decision-making.
| S-EPMC8641220 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWomen with rare diseases, such as osteogenesis imperfecta, may consider pregnancy, although data regarding outcomes, specific risks, and management strategies are lacking.ObjectiveThe Brittle Bone Disorders Consortium of the National Institute of Health Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network established an Osteogenesis Imperfecta Pregnancy Registry to collect and evaluate pregnancy, maternal, and neonatal outcomes in women with osteogenesis imperfecta.Study designThis was a cross-sectional, survey-based study. Appropriate participants of the Brittle Bone Disorders Consortium Contact Registry were invited to participate in the study. Self-reported information regarding pregnancy characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with osteogenesis imperfecta was compared with that of the general population, referenced by literature-based standards. Furthermore, compared with the general population, cohorts of women and fetuses with osteogenesis imperfecta were evaluated to determine whether the presence of osteogenesis imperfecta conveyed an increase in antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum complications and an increase in adverse neonatal outcomes.ResultsHere, a total 132 participants completed the survey. Compared with the general population, women with osteogenesis imperfecta had higher rates of diabetes in pregnancy (13.3% vs 7%; 95% confidence interval, 7.0-19.6; P=.049), cesarean delivery (68.5% vs 32.7%; 95% confidence interval, 59.9-77.1; P<.001), need for blood transfusion (8.3% vs 1.5%; 95% confidence interval, 3.9-12.8; P=.019), and antepartum and postpartum fractures (relative risk, 221; 95% confidence interval, 59.3-823; P<.001). Maternal hospitalization and cesarean delivery rates were higher in individuals with moderate or severe osteogenesis imperfecta than women who reported mild osteogenesis imperfecta. Neonates born to women with osteogenesis imperfecta had higher risk of being low (26.2% vs 6.8%; P<.001) or very low birthweight (13.8% vs 1.4%; P<.001) infants than the general population. Neonates born to women with osteogenesis imperfecta had a higher rate of neonatal intensive care unit admissions (19% vs 5.68%; P<.001) and higher neonatal mortality at 28 days of life (4.8% vs 0.4%; P=.026), regardless of neonatal osteogenesis imperfecta status.ConclusionPregnancies for women with osteogenesis imperfecta are at an increased risk of complications, including hemorrhage, fractures, diabetes mellitus, and increased neonatal morbidity.
| S-EPMC9448563 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeMaternal anemia is a significant risk factor for maternal morbidity and mortality, increasing risk of preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, stillbirth, and death. Moderate and severe anemia in pregnancy is defined as hemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dl and Hb < 7 g/dl, respectively. We aimed to characterize the association of maternal anemia with maternal, neonatal, and placental outcomes in a resource-limited setting.MethodsData were collected from a prospective cohort of 352 pregnant women at a tertiary academic Ugandan hospital. One hundred and seventy-six (50%) of women were living with HIV. Hemoglobin was measured in labor, and placentas were collected postpartum. Maternal outcomes included mode of delivery, hemorrhage, blood transfusion, intensive care unit admission, and maternal mortality. Neonatal outcomes included gestational age at delivery, birthweight, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality. Placental descriptors included weight and thickness. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests.ResultsHemoglobin < 10 g/dl, was present in 17/352 (5%) of women. Significantly more women with moderate or severe anemia were HIV-infected: 14/17 (82%) versus 162/335 (48%) (p = .006). Blood transfusions (2/17, 12% versus 5/335, 2%, p = .04) and neonatal deaths (2/17, 12% versus 9/335, 3%, p = .01) were more common in the anemia group. Placental thickness was lower in the anemia group (1.4 cm versus 1.7 cm, p = .04).ConclusionsModerate and severe anemia was associated with maternal HIV infection, maternal blood transfusion, neonatal death, and decreased placental thickness. The overall rate of moderate and severe anemia among this cohort was lower than previously reported.
| S-EPMC10419325 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThe low COVID-19 vaccine uptake rate among pregnant women is mainly due to safety concerns about COVID-19 vaccines due to limited safety evidence. Our goal was to evaluate the safety of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy with up-to-date evidence.MethodsA comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov was performed on April 5th, 2022, and updated on May 25th, 2022. Studies evaluating the association of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were included. Two reviewers independently performed the risk of bias assessment and data extraction. Inverse variance random effect meta-analyses were performed to pool outcome data.ResultsForty-three observational studies were included. COVID-19 vaccination [96,384 (73.9%) BNT162b2, 30,889 (23.7%) mRNA-1273, and 3,172 (2.4%) other types] during pregnancy [23,721 (18.3%) in the first trimester, 52,778 (40.5%) in the second trimester, and 53,886 (41.2%) in the third trimester].was associated with reduced risks of stillbirth or neonatal death (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.92). Sensitivity analysis restricted to studies in participants without COVID-19 showed that the pooled effect was not robust. COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with congenital anomalies (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.63-1.08), preterm birth (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.06), NICU admission or hospitalization (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84-1.04), an Apgar score at 5 min <7 (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-1.01), low birth weight (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.88-1.14), miscarriage (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.88-1.11), cesarean delivery (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.96-1.19), or postpartum hemorrhage (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.81-1.01).ConclusionsCOVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with any of the adverse neonatal or maternal outcomes studied. Interpretation of study findings is limited by the types and timing of vaccination. The vaccinations in our study received during pregnancy were primarily mRNA vaccines administered in the second and third trimester. Future RCTs and meta-analysis are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and long-term effects of the COVID-19 vaccines.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022322525, identifier: PROSPERO, CRD42022322525.
| S-EPMC9922836 | biostudies-literature