Dataset Information

Peripheral nerve blocks in the cervical region: from anatomy to ultrasound-guided techniques.

ABSTRACT: Cervical plexus nerve blocks have been employed in various head and neck operations. Both adequate anaesthesia and analgesia are attained in clinical practice. Nowadays, ultrasound imaging in regional anaesthesia is driven towards a certain objective that dictates high accuracy and safety during the implementation of peripheral nerve blocks. In the cervical region, ultrasound-guided nerve blocks have routinely been conducted only for the past few years and thus only a small number of publications pervade the current literature. Moreover, the sonoanatomy of the neck, the foundation stone of interventional techniques, is very challenging; multiple muscles and fascial layers compose a complex of compartments in a narrow anatomic region, in which local anaesthetics are injected. Therefore, this review intends to deliver new insights into ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block techniques in the neck. The sonoanatomy of the cervical region, in addition to the cervical plexus, cervical ganglia, superior and recurrent laryngeal nerve blocks are comprehensively discussed.

SUBMITTER: Saranteas T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7719858 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Peripheral nerve blocks in the cervical region: from anatomy to ultrasound-guided techniques.

Saranteas Theodosios T Kostroglou Andreas A Efstathiou Georgia G Giannoulis Dimitrios D Moschovaki Nefeli N Mavrogenis Andreas F AF Perisanidis Christos C

Dento maxillo facial radiology 20200316 8

Cervical plexus nerve blocks have been employed in various head and neck operations. Both adequate anaesthesia and analgesia are attained in clinical practice. Nowadays, ultrasound imaging in regional anaesthesia is driven towards a certain objective that dictates high accuracy and safety during the implementation of peripheral nerve blocks. In the cervical region, ultrasound-guided nerve blocks have routinely been conducted only for the past few years and thus only a small number of publication ...[more]

PMID: 32176537

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundVarious nerve blocks with local anaesthetic agents have been used to reduce pain after hip fracture and subsequent surgery. This review was published originally in 1999 and was updated in 2001, 2002, 2009 and 2017.ObjectivesThis review focuses on the use of peripheral nerves blocks as preoperative analgesia, as postoperative analgesia or as a supplement to general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery. We undertook the update to look for new studies and to update the methods to reflect Cochrane standards.Search methodsFor the updated review, we searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 8), MEDLINE (Ovid SP, 1966 to August week 1 2016), Embase (Ovid SP, 1988 to 2016 August week 1) and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (EBSCO, 1982 to August week 1 2016), as well as trial registers and reference lists of relevant articles.Selection criteriaWe included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving use of nerve blocks as part of the care provided for adults aged 16 years and older with hip fracture.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently assessed new trials for inclusion, determined trial quality using the Cochrane tool and extracted data. When appropriate, we pooled results of outcome measures. We rated the quality of evidence according to the GRADE Working Group approach.Main resultsWe included 31 trials (1760 participants; 897 randomized to peripheral nerve blocks and 863 to no regional blockade). Results of eight trials with 373 participants show that peripheral nerve blocks reduced pain on movement within 30 minutes of block placement (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.14 to -0.67; equivalent to -3.4 on a scale from 0 to 10; I2 = 90%; high quality of evidence). Effect size was proportionate to the concentration of local anaesthetic used (P < 0.00001). Based on seven trials with 676 participants, we did not find a difference in the risk of acute confusional state (risk ratio (RR) 0.69, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.27; I2 = 48%; very low quality of evidence). Three trials with 131 participants reported decreased risk for pneumonia (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.89; I2 = 3%; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 7, 95% CI 5 to 72; moderate quality of evidence). We did not find a difference in risk of myocardial ischaemia or death within six months, but the number of participants included was well below the optimal information size for these two outcomes. Two trials with 155 participants reported that peripheral nerve blocks also reduced time to first mobilization after surgery (mean difference -11.25 hours, 95% CI -14.34 to -8.15 hours; I2 = 52%; moderate quality of evidence). One trial with 75 participants indicated that the cost of analgesic drugs was lower when they were given as a single shot block (SMD -3.48, 95% CI -4.23 to -2.74; moderate quality of evidence).Authors' conclusionsHigh-quality evidence shows that regional blockade reduces pain on movement within 30 minutes after block placement. Moderate-quality evidence shows reduced risk for pneumonia, decreased time to first mobilization and cost reduction of the analgesic regimen (single shot blocks).

Project description:BackgroundDeveloping proficiency in ultrasound-guided nerve block (UGNB) demands an intricate understanding of cross-sectional anatomy as well as spatial reasoning, which is a big challenge for beginners. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of virtual reality (VR)-facilitated anatomy education in the first performance of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus blockade among novice anesthesiologists. We carried out pilot testing of this hypothesis using a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial.MethodsTwenty-one anesthesia trainees with no prior ultrasonography or nerve block training were included in this study. All participants underwent a training program encompassing theory and hands-on practice. Trainees were randomized into one of two groups: one received VR-assisted anatomy course while the other did not. Subsequently, both groups completed identical practical modules on ultrasound scanning and needle insertion. The primary end point was defined as the evaluation of trainees' performance during their initial ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block, assessed using both the Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a task-specific Checklist. The secondary end point included the improvement in scores for written multiple-choice questions (MCQs).ResultsIn evaluating practical ultrasound-guided nerve block skills, the VR group significantly outperformed the control group on the task-specific Checklist (29.23 ± 3.91 vs. 24.85 ± 5.13; P < 0.05), while both groups showed comparable performance on the GRS. Additionally, post-theoretical course MCQ scores increased substantially, with post-test results significantly surpassing pre-test scores in both groups (P < 0.001). However, intergroup analysis indicated no significant difference in score improvements between the VR and control groups (21.82 ± 12.30 vs. 18.33 ± 9.68, P > 0.05).ConclusionsOverall, the findings of this pilot study suggest that immersive virtual reality training in anatomy may contribute to improving the proficiency of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks among novice anesthesiologists. Incorporating VR into future anesthesia technique training programs should be considered.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2300067437. Date of Registration Jan 9, 2023.

Dataset Information

Peripheral nerve blocks in the cervical region: from anatomy to ultrasound-guided techniques.

Publications

Peripheral nerve blocks in the cervical region: from anatomy to ultrasound-guided techniques.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets