Dataset Information

Efficacy of alemtuzumab in relapsing-remitting MS patients who received additional courses after the initial two courses: Pooled analysis of the CARE-MS, extension, and TOPAZ studies.

ABSTRACT: Background: Alemtuzumab is given as two annual courses. Patients with continued disease activity may receive as-needed additional courses.

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of additional alemtuzumab courses in the CARE-MS (Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif^® Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis) studies and their extensions.

Methods: Subgroups were based on the number of additional alemtuzumab courses received. Exclusion criteria: other disease-modifying therapy (DMT); <12-month follow-up after last alemtuzumab course.

Results: In the additional-courses groups, Courses 3 and 4 reduced annualized relapse rate (12?months before: 0.73 and 0.74, respectively; 12?months after: 0.07 and 0.08). For 36?months after Courses 3 and 4, 89% and 92% of patients were free of 6-month confirmed disability worsening, respectively, with 20% and 26% achieving 6-month confirmed disability improvement. Freedom from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disease activity increased after Courses 3 and 4 (12?months before: 43% and 53%, respectively; 12?months after: 73% and 74%). Safety was similar across groups; serious events occurred irrespective of the number of courses.

Conclusion: Additional alemtuzumab courses significantly improved outcomes, without increased safety risks, in CARE-MS patients with continued disease activity after Course 2. How this compares to outcomes if treatment is switched to another DMT instead remains unknown.

SUBMITTER: Comi G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7720359 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy of alemtuzumab in relapsing-remitting MS patients who received additional courses after the initial two courses: Pooled analysis of the CARE-MS, extension, and TOPAZ studies.

Comi Giancarlo G Alroughani Raed R Boster Aaron L AL Bass Ann D AD Berkovich Regina R Fernández Óscar Ó Kim Ho Jin HJ Limmroth Volker V Lycke Jan J Macdonell Richard Al RA Sharrack Basil B Singer Barry A BA Vermersch Patrick P Wiendl Heinz H Ziemssen Tjalf T Jacobs Alan A Daizadeh Nadia N Rodriguez Claudio E CE Traboulsee Anthony A

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 20191125 14

<h4>Background</h4>Alemtuzumab is given as two annual courses. Patients with continued disease activity may receive as-needed additional courses.<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate efficacy and safety of additional alemtuzumab courses in the CARE-MS (Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif<sup>®</sup> Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis) studies and their extensions.<h4>Methods</h4>Subgroups were based on the number of additional alemtuzumab courses received. Exclusion criteria: other disease-modifying therapy ...[more]

PMID: 31762387

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo characterize effects of alemtuzumab treatment on measures of disability improvement in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) with inadequate response (≥1 relapse) to prior therapy.MethodsComparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (CARE-MS) II, a 2-year randomized, rater-blinded, active-controlled, head-to-head, phase 3 trial, compared efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab 12 mg with subcutaneous interferon-β-1a (SC IFN-β-1a) 44 μg in patients with RRMS. Prespecified and post hoc disability outcomes based on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), and Sloan low-contrast letter acuity (SLCLA) are reported, focusing on improvement of preexisting disability in addition to slowing of disability accumulation.ResultsAlemtuzumab-treated patients were more likely than SC IFN-β-1a-treated patients to show improvement in EDSS scores (p < 0.0001) on all 7 functional systems. Significantly more alemtuzumab patients demonstrated 6-month confirmed disability improvement. The likelihood of improved vs stable/worsening MSFC scores was greater with alemtuzumab than SC IFN-β-1a (p = 0.0300); improvement in MSFC scores with alemtuzumab was primarily driven by the upper limb coordination and dexterity domain. Alemtuzumab-treated patients had more favorable changes from baseline in SLCLA (2.5% contrast) scores (p = 0.0014) and MSFC + SLCLA composite scores (p = 0.0097) than SC IFN-β-1a-treated patients.ConclusionsIn patients with RRMS and inadequate response to prior disease-modifying therapies, alemtuzumab provides greater benefits than SC IFN-β-1a across several disability outcomes, reflecting improvement of preexisting disabilities.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class I evidence (based on rater blinding and a balance in baseline characteristics between arms) that alemtuzumab modifies disability measures favorably compared with SC IFN-β-1a.

Project description:IntroductionMultiple sclerosis (MS) patients of African descent have increased risk for disease progression and may be less responsive to disease-modifying therapy.MethodsPatients in the CARE-MS studies received alemtuzumab 12 mg/day [initial alemtuzumab treatment (IAT); baseline: 5 days; 12 months later: 3 days] or subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) 3 ×/week. Core study outcomes were compared between treatment groups. In the extension study CAMMS03409, SC IFNB-1a-treated patients switched to alemtuzumab [delayed alemtuzumab treatment (DAT)]. Data from IAT and DAT arms were pooled to assess outcomes through 6 years post alemtuzumab initiation; IAT patients had an additional 2 years of follow-up in TOPAZ.ResultsOf 1200 CARE-MS patients, 43 (4%) were of African descent (35 IAT; 8 DAT) and received alemtuzumab in the 2-year core and/or 6-year extension; 29 (67%) remained on study at the time of analysis (24 IAT patients completed year 8 post alemtuzumab; 5 DAT patients completed year 6 post alemtuzumab). In year 2, annualized relapse rate (ARR; 0.09 versus 0.42), percentage of patients with improved Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; 18% versus 11%), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI; 28% versus 13%), no evidence of disease activity (55% versus 13%), and cumulative brain volume loss (BVL; - 0.55% versus - 1.32%) favored alemtuzumab versus SC IFNB-1a. Alemtuzumab remained efficacious at year 6 (pooled IAT/DAT) and at year 8 (IAT only) post alemtuzumab (ARR: 0.15 and 0.30; improved EDSS: 17% and 25%; CDI: 47% and 55%; BVL: - 1.14% and - 0.70%, respectively). No safety signals were unique to this population.ConclusionsAlemtuzumab was efficacious in a small cohort of relapsing-remitting MS patients of African descent over 8 years. Safety was consistent with the overall CARE-MS population, although the small sample size may have prevented the detection of known low-frequency adverse events. CLINICALTRIALS.Gov registration numbersCARE-MS I, II, extension, TOPAZ: NCT00530348, NCT00548405, NCT00930553, NCT02255656.FundingSanofi (Cambridge, MA, USA) and Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals (Leverkusen, Germany).

Project description:Background and objectivesAlemtuzumab demonstrated superior efficacy versus subcutaneous interferon (IFN) beta-1a in participants with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the 2-year CARE-MS I and II trials. Efficacy was maintained in the 4-year CARE-MS extension, during which alemtuzumab-treated participants ('alemtuzumab-only') could receive additional courses upon disease activity, and IFN-treated participants switched to alemtuzumab ('IFN-alemtuzumab'). Participants who completed the CARE-MS extension could enroll in the open-label TOPAZ study which assessed safety and efficacy for 5-7 years (11-13 years after alemtuzumab/IFN initiation).MethodsParticipants received additional alemtuzumab courses as needed. Assessments included adverse events (AEs; primary outcome), annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed disability worsening [CDW; ⩾1.0-point Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score increase or ⩾1.5 if baseline EDSS = 0], and 6-month confirmed disease improvement [CDI; >1.0-point EDSS decrease (baseline score ⩾2.0)].Results43.5% of alemtuzumab-only participants from CARE-MS II and 54.2% from CARE-MS I received no additional alemtuzumab courses; 30.0% and 20.9%, respectively, received one additional course (the median). Incidences of AEs, including thyroid AEs and infections, declined over time. The safety profile of alemtuzumab was similar for participants who received zero, one, or two additional courses. For CARE-MS II participants, who had inadequate response to previous treatment, ARR remained low during Years 3-13 for the alemtuzumab-only [0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.20] and IFN-alemtuzumab (0.14; 0.11-0.17) groups. At Year 11, the proportions of participants who were either free from CDW or who had CDI were higher in the alemtuzumab-only group (58% and 49%, respectively) than in the IFN-alemtuzumab group (51% and 37%). For CARE-MS I participants, who were previously treatment-naïve, clinical outcomes remained improved, and no between-group differences were apparent.ConclusionSafety risks associated with alemtuzumab treatment declined over time. Clinical benefits were maintained up to 11-13 years, and most participants did not require more than one additional course.Clinicaltrialsgov identifiersNCT00530348; NCT00548405; NCT00930553; NCT02255656.

Project description:One of our new major finding among the genes that contributes to MS susceptibility is ICSBP1. The so called disease modifying therapies like interferon-beta (IFN-β), possibly acting on the peripheral T-cells, reduce the disease activity and the clinical progression, with a MRI-detectable effect in preventing lesion burden and cerebral atrophy development in RR-MS. It suggests a critical role of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) immune response and modulation in developing inflammation in the brain. We tested the hypothesis that the genetic effect of the susceptible allele ICSBP1 can impact the gene expression profile of molecules belonging to the interferon pathway. We therefore interrogated the PBMC for changes in gene expression profile. We correlate those changes with the minor allele frequency for ICSBP1, performing independent quantitative trait analysis for each treatment category. Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Association with a p value < 0.05 have been used in follow up analysis. The regression coefficient of the Quantitative trait association represents the degree of correlation between the gene expression for each interrogated target gene and the minor allele frequency of the SNP for our gene of interest. This coefficient has been used as input in the subsequent Gene Set Enrichment Analysis performed in a pre-ranked approach. The resulting GSEA-SNP method rests on the assumption that SNPs underlying a disease phenotype might affect genes constituting a signaling pathway or genes with a common regulation. Therefore, GSEA-SNP can facilitate the identification of pathways or of underlying biological mechanisms. We used microarrays to capture gene expression profile of untreated subjects and of subjects under disease modyfing treatment (Interferon Beta and Glatiramer Acetate), in order to correlate gene expression and genotype data and in order to identify sets of genes specifically regulated in the different treatment categories.

Project description:Alemtuzumab (previously known as Campath(®)) is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the CD52 antigen on mature lymphocytes that results in lymphopenia and subsequent modification of the immune repertoire. Here we explore evidence for its efficacy and safety in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. One Phase II and two Phase III trials of alemtuzumab versus active comparator (interferon beta-1a) have been reported. Two of these rater-blinded randomized studies assessed clinical and radiological outcomes in treatment-naïve patients; one explored patients who had relapsed despite first-line therapy. Compared to interferon beta-1a, alemtuzumab reduced the relapse rate by 49%-74% (P < 0.0001), and in two studies it reduced the risk of sustained disability accumulation by 42%-71% (P < 0.01). In one study (Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis; CARE-MS1), there was no significant difference compared to interferon, perhaps reflecting the surprisingly low frequency of disability events in the comparator group. After alemtuzumab, the Expanded Disability Status Scale score improved by 0.14-1.2 points, culminating in a net advantage with alemtuzumab of 0.41-0.77 points over interferon in the CAMMS223 and CARE-MS2 trials (both P < 0.001). Radiological markers of new lesion formation and brain atrophy following alemtuzumab were significantly improved when compared to interferon in all studies. Adverse events were more common following alemtuzumab than interferon beta-1a (7.2-8.66 versus 4.9-5.7 events per person-year). While infusion reactions are the most common, autoimmunity is the most concerning; within Phase III studies, thyroid disorders (17%-18% versus 5%-6%) and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (1% versus 0%) were reported in patients taking alemtuzumab and interferon beta-1a, respectively. All patients responded to conventional therapy. One patient taking alemtuzumab in the Phase II study suffered a fatal intracranial hemorrhage following immune thrombocytopenic purpura, heralding assiduous monitoring of all patients thereafter. Alemtuzumab has been submitted for licensing in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States and Europe.

Dataset Information

Efficacy of alemtuzumab in relapsing-remitting MS patients who received additional courses after the initial two courses: Pooled analysis of the CARE-MS, extension, and TOPAZ studies.

Publications

Efficacy of alemtuzumab in relapsing-remitting MS patients who received additional courses after the initial two courses: Pooled analysis of the CARE-MS, extension, and TOPAZ studies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets