Dataset Information

Impacts of dialysis adequacy and intradialytic hypotension on changes in dialysis recovery time.

ABSTRACT: Background: Dialysis recovery time (DRT) surveys capture the perceived time after HD to return to performing regular activities. Prior studies suggest the majority of HD patients report a DRT >?2?h. However, the profiles of and modifiable dialysis practices associated with changes in DRT relative to the start of dialysis are unknown. We hypothesized hemodialysis (HD) dose and rates of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) would associate with changes in DRT in the first years after initiating dialysis.

Methods: We analyzed data from adult HD patients who responded to a DRT survey ?180?days from first date of dialysis (FDD) during 2014 to 2017. DRT survey was administered with annual KDQOL survey. DRT survey asks: "How long does it take you to be able to return to your normal activities after your dialysis treatment?" Answers are: ?4?h. An adjusted logistic regression model computed odds ratio for a change to a longer DRT (increase above DRT >?2?h) in reference to a change to a shorter DRT (decrease below DRT ?4?h). Changes in DRT were calculated from incident (?180?days FDD) to first prevalent (>?365-to-???545?days FDD) and second prevalent (>?730-to-???910?days FDD) years.

Results: Among 98,616 incident HD patients (age 62.6?±?14.4?years, 57.8% male) who responded to DRT survey, a higher spKt/V in the incident period was associated with 13.5% (OR?=?0.865; 95%CI 0.801-to-0.935) lower risk of a change to a longer DRT in the first-prevalent year. A higher number of HD treatments with IDH episodes per month in the incident period was associated with a 0.8% (OR?=?1.008; 95%CI 1.001-to-1.015) and 1.6% (OR?=?1.016; 95%CI 1.006-to-1.027) higher probability of a change to a longer DRT in the first- and second-prevalent years, respectively. Consistently, an increased in incidence of IDH episodes/months was associated to a change to a longer DRT over time.

Conclusions: Incident patients who had higher spKt/V and less sessions with IDH episodes had a lower likelihood of changing to a longer DRT in first year of HD. Dose optimization strategies with cardiac stability in fluid removal should be tested.

SUBMITTER: Guedes M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7720452 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impacts of dialysis adequacy and intradialytic hypotension on changes in dialysis recovery time.

Guedes Murilo M Pecoits-Filho Roberto R Leme Juliana El Ghoz JEG Jiao Yue Y Raimann Jochen G JG Wang Yuedong Y Kotanko Peter P de Moraes Thyago Proença TP Thadhani Ravi R Maddux Franklin W FW Usvyat Len A LA Larkin John W JW

BMC nephrology 20201207 1

<h4>Background</h4>Dialysis recovery time (DRT) surveys capture the perceived time after HD to return to performing regular activities. Prior studies suggest the majority of HD patients report a DRT > 2 h. However, the profiles of and modifiable dialysis practices associated with changes in DRT relative to the start of dialysis are unknown. We hypothesized hemodialysis (HD) dose and rates of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) would associate with changes in DRT in the first years after initiating d ...[more]

PMID: 33287719

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundExercise has various positive effects on hemodialysis patients. However, there is no clear evidence which type of exercise yields better results. This study aimed to determine the effects of guided functional training added to the intradialytic cycling on dialysis adequacy and biochemical parameters in hemodialysis patients. Additionally, we aimed to investigate if patients could transfer functional exercise to an unsupervised home environment and retain gained improvements.MethodsRandomization was done to a functional training intervention group (INT) (n = 20) or intradialytic cycling control group (CON) (n = 20). The INT attended a pre-dialysis functional training in the first 8 weeks. In the second 8 weeks, they performed functional exercises at unsupervised home environment on non-dialysis days. During the whole study, both groups participated in the intradialytic cycling program.ResultsBoth groups demonstrated a significant increase in dialysis adequacy (Kt/V) in the eight (0.15, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.24; p = 0.003 for INT and 0.21, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.3; p < 0.001 for CON) and the 16th study week (0.13, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.24; p = 0.017 for INT and 0.13, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.22; p = 0.013 for CON) compared to their baseline values with no significant between-group differences. At week eight, the total cholesterol was significantly lowered in the INT (- 0.34 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.6 to - 0.07; p = 0.016) and remained lower at week 16 (- 0.32 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.01; p = 0.049) with no significant changes in the CON. Low-density lipoprotein levels in the INT were significantly reduced after 8 weeks (- 0.35 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.06; p = 0.022) and remained reduced after 16 weeks (- 0.28 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.52 to - 0.03; p = 0.030). There were no significant differences found for albumin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, and hemoglobin in both groups.ConclusionsWe demonstrated that functional training added to intradialytic cycling improved lipid profile and dialysis adequacy. Additionally, the effects of the unsupervised, home-based program were preserved during the second study phase. This study supports the assumption that combined training is more effective compared to solely intradialytic exercise.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03334123 . Registered 07 November 2017.

Project description:IntroductionIntradialytic cycling is often performed during the first half of hemodialysis because of concerns regarding increased frequency of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) late in hemodialysis. This increases exercise program resource needs and limits utility of intradialytic cycling to treat dialysis-related symptoms.MethodsThis multicenter, randomized, crossover trial compared IDH rate when cycling during the first half versus the second half of hemodialysis in 98 adults on maintenance hemodialysis. Group A cycled during the first half of hemodialysis for 2 weeks and subsequently during the second half for 2 weeks. In group B, the cycling schedule was reversed. Blood pressure (BP) was measured every 15 minutes throughout hemodialysis. Primary outcome was IDH rate (systolic BP [SBP] decrease of >20 mm Hg or SBP <90 mm Hg). Secondary outcomes included symptomatic IDH rate and time to recover post hemodialysis. Data were analyzed using negative binomial and gamma distribution mixed regression.ResultsMean age 64.7 (SD 12.0) and 64.7 (SD 14.2) years in group A (n = 52) and group B (n = 46), respectively. Proportions of females were 33% in group A and 43% in group B. Median time on hemodialysis was 4.1 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.5, 6.1]) years in group A and 3.9 years (IQR 2.5, 6.7) in group B. IDH rate per 100 hemodialysis hours (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 34.2 (26.4, 42.0) and 36.0 (28.9, 43.1) during early and late intradialytic cycling, respectively (P = 0.53). Timing of intradialytic cycling was not associated with symptomatic IDH (relative risk [RR]: 1.07 [0.75-1.53]) or time to recover post hemodialysis (odds ratio: 0.99 [0.79-1.23]).ConclusionWe found no association between the rate of overall or symptomatic IDH and the timing of intradialytic cycling in patients enrolled in an intradialytic cycling program. Increased use of cycling late in hemodialysis may optimize intradialytic cycling program resource use and should be studied as a possible treatment for symptoms common in late hemodialysis.

Dataset Information

Impacts of dialysis adequacy and intradialytic hypotension on changes in dialysis recovery time.

Publications

Impacts of dialysis adequacy and intradialytic hypotension on changes in dialysis recovery time.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets