Dataset Information

Gender disparities in lung cancer survival from an enriched Florida population-based cancer registry.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Previous studies have revealed gender disparities in lung cancer survivorship, but comprehensive inclusion of clinical/individual variables which affect outcomes is underreported. We utilized the Florida Data Cancer System (FCDS) to examine associations between gender and lung cancer survivorship while controlling for prognostic variables on a large population-based scale.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis utilizing the FCDS, linked to Florida Agency for Health Care Administration and US Census Bureau tracts for patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer (n = 165,465) from 1996 to 2007. Primary outcome measures included median survival time and mortality. Multivariable Cox regression models, independent sample T-tests, and descriptive statistics were utilized with significance defined as p < 0.05.

Results

165,465 cases were analyzed revealing 44.3% females and 55.7% males. The majority of patients were white/Caucasian, males, middle-high socioeconomic status, lived in urban areas, and geriatric age. Females had longer median survival compared to males (9.6 vs 7.1 months). Multivariable analyses showed that women had better survival after controlling for sociodemographic, clinical, and comorbidity covariates. Males had higher risk of mortality than females (aHR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.14-1.19, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Individuals of higher socioeconomic status experienced greater survivorship compared to those of lower socioeconomic status. Women experienced significantly better survival for lung cancer at multiple time frames after controlling for covariates compared to men. Interventions aimed at public education and access to high-quality healthcare are needed to ameliorate socioeconomic and gender-based disparities in lung cancer survivorship. Future studies should investigate gender differences in lung cancer while incorporating individual socioeconomic status and treatment received.

SUBMITTER: Elkbuli A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7723764 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Gender disparities in lung cancer survival from an enriched Florida population-based cancer registry.

Elkbuli Adel A Byrne Margaret M MM Zhao Wei W Sutherland Mason M McKenney Mark M Godinez Yeissen Y Dave Devina J DJ Bouzoubaa Layla L Koru-Sengul Tulay T

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) 20201201

<h4>Background</h4>Previous studies have revealed gender disparities in lung cancer survivorship, but comprehensive inclusion of clinical/individual variables which affect outcomes is underreported. We utilized the Florida Data Cancer System (FCDS) to examine associations between gender and lung cancer survivorship while controlling for prognostic variables on a large population-based scale.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective cohort analysis utilizing the FCDS, linked to Florida Agency for Health Ca ...[more]

PMID: 33318793

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveLow dose computed tomography (LDCT) became the standard method for lung cancer (LC) screening in 2013. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in survival rates based on sex and whether the differences depend on screening status. We aimed to evaluate the LC survival rates between females and males based on screening.Material and methodsThis retrospective cohort study examined data from the Boston LC Study (BLCS) between 2013 and 2021. LC screening depends on patients' demographics (age and smoking history) to determine whether a person is a high-risk individual and, therefore, undergo LDCT. Descriptive statistics were calculated for race, age, histology, smoking history, stage, and treatment. These variables' distributions were compared between sex and screening status using t-test and chi-square, respectively. Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare survival between sex and screening. Propensity score matching was applied to account for selection bias in screening when evaluating the association between screening and stage.ResultsA total of 1,216 LC patients were identified with a screening incidence of 9.4 %, among whom 56 % were female. Unscreened males had 1.59 times higher risk of mortality than unscreened females (P=.0002) and had a worse 5-year survival (male 50 %; 95 %CI, 0.38,0.6 vs female 70 %; 95 %CI,0.62,0.76). In contrast, there were no significant differences in survival between sexes among screened. In a balanced cohort of screened and unscreened, the odds of being diagnosed at late stages for females and smokers were 1.33 and 2.51 times that of males and nonsmokers; however, there were no statistical significance.ConclusionUnscreened females had a lower risk of mortality and better survival than unscreened males, while among the screened population, there was no difference in the overall survival. These observations demonstrate the influence of sex on survival prognosis in LC when screening is not performed.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough landmark studies in the 1990s demonstrated that adolescents and young adults (AYAs, ages 15-39 years) with cancer had lower survival improvement compared to other ages, therapeutic advances warrant reappraisal of those observations. We utilized more recent data to study site-specific AYA survival trends and disparities and gain a more contemporary understanding of this problem.MethodsUsing California Cancer Registry data from 1988 to 2014, we calculated 1) 5-year overall survival improvement for AYAs compared to other age groups; 2) hazard ratios (HRs) of death for AYAs comparing 2001-2014 with 1988-2000 stratified by site, stage, sex, age group, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES); and 3) site-specific adjusted HRs (aHRs) for AYA risk groups and interaction analyses by time period.ResultsFor all cancers combined, AYAs demonstrated survival improvement that exceeded all other age groups, largely due to reduced mortality in human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related cancers. The strongest predictor of death was cancer stage (aHR = 6.32 for distant vs localized, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.20 to 6.45). The aHR of death was statistically significantly higher for blacks (1.46, 95% CI = 1.42 to 1.50), Asian and Pacific Islanders (1.12, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.15), and Latino whites (1.06, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.08) compared to non-Latino whites, and was statistically significantly higher for low SES compared to high (1.31, 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.34). Survival disparities by stage, race and ethnicity, and SES worsened over time.ConclusionsFor AYAs in aggregate, the historical cancer survival improvement gap has been closed. However, the growing survival disparities in AYA subsets reported here, including advanced stage disease, racial and ethnic minorities, and low SES, highlight new priorities in need of increased attention, including inequities in cancer care and delivery within this vulnerable population.

Project description:BackgroundThe relation between breast cancer molecular subtype and survival has been studied in several jurisdictions, but limited information is available for Ontario. The aim of this study was to determine breast cancer survival by molecular subtype and to assess the effect on survival of selected demographic and tumour-based characteristics.MethodsWe extracted 29 833 breast cancer cases (in 26 538 girls and women aged ≥ 15 yr) diagnosed between 2010 and 2012 from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Cancers were categorized into 4 molecular subtypes: 1) luminal A (estrogen-receptor-positive and/or progesterone-receptor-positive [ER+ and/or PR+] and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2-]), 2) luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+/HER2+), 3) HER2-enriched (ER- and PR-/HER2+) and 4) triple-negative (ER- and PR-/HER2-). We estimated associations with predictor variables (age, stage at diagnosis, histologic type, comorbidity and place of residence [urban or rural]) using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Likelihood ratio testing was used to evaluate differences in risk of death.ResultsLuminal A was the most commonly diagnosed subtype (59.0%) and had the greatest survival, whereas triple-negative had the poorest survival. For all subtypes, a dose-response effect was observed between the hazard of death and age and stage at diagnosis, with the greatest effect found for the HER2-enriched subtype (age: hazard ratio [HR] 7.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.68-11.81]; stage at diagnosis: HR 37.71 [95% CI 34.64-41.27]). Moderate comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index score 1 or 2) was associated with increased risk of death for triple-negative cancers (HR 2.42 [95% CI 1.36-4.31]), and severe comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 3) increased the risk for all molecular subtypes.InterpretationThe results indicate the importance of including molecular subtype, along with age, stage at diagnosis and comorbidity, in assessing breast cancer survival. They highlight the need to address outcomes related to hormone-receptor-negative cancers, for which survival lags behind that for hormone-receptor-positive cancers.

Dataset Information

Gender disparities in lung cancer survival from an enriched Florida population-based cancer registry.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Gender disparities in lung cancer survival from an enriched Florida population-based cancer registry.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets