Dataset Information

Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

In 2015, new FIGO guidelines for CTG interpretation were presented (FIGO-15). In 2017, the previous Swedish guidelines (SWE-09) were replaced with guidelines adapted to FIGOs (SWE-17). The performance of these three templates had not been scientifically evaluated before its clinical implementation. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity to detect fetal acidosis at birth using these three templates during the second stage of labor.

Study design

This case-control study included 295 neonates with cord blood pH?ResultsThe classification pathological using FIGO-15 had a sensitivity of 50 % and specificity of 88 % in detecting fetuses with acidosis. For SWE-17, the sensitivity was 62 % and the specificity 85 %. For SWE-09 the sensitivity was 87 % and the specificity 56 %.By combining suspicious and pathological patterns the sensitivity for FIGO-15 increased to 97 %, and for SWE-17 to 83 %, whereas the specificity decreased to 23 % and 68 % respectively.

Conclusions

The FIGO classification seemed to be insufficiently discriminative in the second stage of labor; most patterns in acidotic cases were classified as merely suspicious with this template, and the sensitivity of pathological patterns was low at 50 %. Combined pathological and suspicious patterns detected fetal acidosis at a specificity that was too low to be useful (23 %). SWE-09 showed the best ability to detect acidosis with pathological patterns (sensitivity 87 %). SWE-17 reached almost the same sensitivity (83 %) with the combination of suspicious and pathological patterns, and at a higher specificity (68 %).

SUBMITTER: Ekengard F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7724159 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor.

Ekengård Frida F Cardell Monika M Herbst Andreas A

European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X 20201125

<h4>Objective</h4>In 2015, new FIGO guidelines for CTG interpretation were presented (FIGO-15). In 2017, the previous Swedish guidelines (SWE-09) were replaced with guidelines adapted to FIGOs (SWE-17). The performance of these three templates had not been scientifically evaluated before its clinical implementation. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity to detect fetal acidosis at birth using these three templates during the second stage of labor.<h4>Study de ...[more]

PMID: 33319210

Similar Datasets

Project description:Prolonged second stage of labor is a common abnormality of labor progression. Very little research exists regarding the relationship between prolonged second stage of labor and antepartum sonographic fetal head biometry parameters, especially fetal biparietal diameter (BPD). Fetal BPD assessment is essential for estimating fetal weight, and these measurements are readily available to Japanese obstetricians. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study to evaluate the association between BPD fetal Z-score and prolonged second stage of labor in a Japanese cohort. Individual BPD data measured using a GE Voluson 730 expert ultrasound system (GE, Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) were converted to Z-scores for a particular gestational age. After excluding patients with multiple pregnancies and emergency or elective cesarean sections, a total of 2,711 (nulliparity, n = 1341) Japanese women who delivered at term were included. We analyzed the incidence of prolonged second stage of labor and the association between BPD Z-score measured <7 days before delivery and prolonged second stage of labor by parity. The overall incidence of prolonged second stage of labor was 18.3% (246/1,341) in nulliparous women and 4.6% (63/1,370) in multiparous women. In nulliparous women, multivariable analysis indicated that BPD Z-score was significantly associated with prolonged second stage of labor (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.37). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that at each time point during the second stage of labor, the percentage of women who had not yet delivered was higher among those who delivered neonates with large BPD Z-scores than among those who delivered neonates with smaller BPD Z-scores. On the contrary, in multiparous women, BPD Z-score was not statistically associated with prolonged second stage of labor. Our results suggest that considering BPD Z-score is helpful in the management of nulliparous women who are at risk of developing a prolonged second stage of labor.

Project description:Background Sub‐optimal classification, interpretation and response to intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring using cardiotocography are known problems. Training is often recommended as a solution, but there is lack of clarity about the effects of training and which type of training works best. Objectives Systematic review of the effects of training healthcare professionals in intrapartum cardiotocography (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42017064525). Search strategy CENTRAL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, British Nursing Database, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, grey literature and ongoing clinical trials were searched. Selection criteria Primary studies that reported impact of training healthcare professionals in intrapartum cardiotocography. Title/abstract, full‐text screening and quality assessment were conducted in duplicate. Data collection and analysis Data were synthesised both narratively and using meta‐analysis. Risk of bias and overall quality were assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and GRADE. Main results Sixty‐four studies were included. Overall, training and reporting were heterogeneous, the outcomes evaluated varied widely and study quality was low. Five randomised controlled trials reported that training improved knowledge of maternity professionals compared with no training, but evidence was of low quality. Evidence for the impact of cardiotocography training on neonatal and maternal outcomes was limited, showed inconsistent effects, and was of low overall quality. Evidence for the optimal content and method of delivery of training was very limited. Conclusions Given the scale of harm and litigation claims associated with electronic fetal monitoring, the evidence‐base for training requires improvement. It should address intervention design, evaluation of clinical outcomes and system‐wide contexts of sub‐optimal practice. Tweetable abstract Training in fetal monitoring: systematic review finds little evidence of impact on neonatal outcomes. Tweetable abstract Training in fetal monitoring: systematic review finds little evidence of impact on neonatal outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundIntermittent auscultation (IA) is the technique of listening to and counting the fetal heart rate (FHR) for short periods during active labour and continuous cardiotocography (CTC) implies FHR monitoring for longer periods. Although the evidence suggests that IA is the best way to monitor healthy women at low risk of complications, there is no scientific evidence for the ideal device, timing, frequency and duration for IA. We aimed to give an overview of the field, identify and describe methods and practices for performing IA, map the evidence and accuracy for different methods of IA, and identify research gaps.MethodsWe conducted a systematic scoping review following the Joanna Briggs methodology. Medline, EMBASE, Cinahl, Maternity & Infant Care, Cochrane Library, SveMed+, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs and African Journals Online were searched for publications up to January 2019. We did hand searches in relevant articles and databases. Studies from all countries, international guidelines and national guidelines from Denmark, United Kingdom, United States, New Zealand, Australia, The Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, and Norway were included. We did quality assessment of the guidelines according to the AGREEMENT tool. We performed a meta-analysis assessing the effects of IA with a Doppler device vs. Pinard device using methods described in The Cochrane Handbook, and we performed an overall assessment of the summary of evidence using the GRADE approach.ResultsThe searches generated 6408 hits of which 26 studies and 11 guidelines were included in the review. The studies described slightly different techniques for performing IA, and some did not provide detailed descriptions. Few of the studies provided details of normal and abnormal IA findings. All 11 guidelines recommended IA for low risk women, although they had slightly different recommendations on the frequency, timing, and duration for IA, and the FHR characteristics that should be observed. Four of the included studies, comprising 8436 women and their babies, were randomised controlled trials that evaluated the effect of IA with a Doppler device vs. a Pinard device. Abnormal FHRs were detected more often using the Doppler device than in those using the Pinard device (risk ratio 1.77; 95% confidence interval 1.29-2.43). There were no significant differences in any of the other maternal or neonatal outcomes. Four studies assessed the accuracy of IA findings. Normal FHR was easiest to identify correctly, whereas identifying periodic FHR patterns such as decelerations and saltatory patterns were more difficult.ConclusionAlthough IA is the recommended method, no trials have been published that evaluate protocols on how to perform it. Nor has any study assessed interrater agreements regarding interpretations of IA findings, and few have assessed to what degree clinicians can describe FHR patterns detected by IA. We found no evidence to recommend Doppler device instead of the Pinard for IA, or vice versa.

Dataset Information

Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor.

Objective

Study design

Conclusions

Publications

Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets