Dataset Information

Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide vs history of heart failure hospitalization in a large real-world population.

ABSTRACT: Background: In heart failure (HF) patients, both natriuretic peptides (NP) and previous HF hospitalization (pHFH) have been used to predict prognosis.

Hypothesis: In a large real-world population, both NP levels and pHFH have independent and interdependent predictive value for clinical outcomes of HFH and all-cause mortality.

Methods: Linked electronic health records and insurance claims data from Decision Resource Group were used to identify HF patients that had a BNP or NT-proBNP result between January 2012 and December 2016. NT-proBNP was converted into BNP equivalents by dividing by 4. Index event was defined as most recent NP on or after 1 January 2012. Patients with incomplete records or age
Results: Of 64?355 patients (74?±?12?years old, 49% female) with available values, median BNP was 259 [IQR 101-642] pg/ml. The risk of both HFH and mortality was higher with increasing BNP levels. At each level of BNP, mortality was only slightly higher in patients with pHFH vs those without pHFH (RR 1.2 [95%CI 1.2,1.3], P?
Conclusion: In this large real-world heart failure population, higher BNP levels were associated with increased risk for both HFH and mortality. At any given level of BNP, pHFH added greater prognostic value for prediction of future HFH than for mortality.

SUBMITTER: Zile MR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7724209 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide vs history of heart failure hospitalization in a large real-world population.

Zile Michael R MR Desai Akshay S AS Agarwal Rahul R Bharmi Rupinder R Dalal Nirav N Adamson Philip B PB Maisel Alan S AS

Clinical cardiology 20200919 12

<h4>Background</h4>In heart failure (HF) patients, both natriuretic peptides (NP) and previous HF hospitalization (pHFH) have been used to predict prognosis.<h4>Hypothesis</h4>In a large real-world population, both NP levels and pHFH have independent and interdependent predictive value for clinical outcomes of HFH and all-cause mortality.<h4>Methods</h4>Linked electronic health records and insurance claims data from Decision Resource Group were used to identify HF patients that had a BNP or NT-p ...[more]

PMID: 32949178

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesThis study sought to characterize urinary and plasma C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) to define their relationship with clinical variables and to determine whether urinary and plasma CNP together add prognostic value.BackgroundCNP is a protective hormone that is synthesized in the kidney and endothelium and possesses antiremodeling properties. Urinary and plasma CNP levels are elevated in pathophysiological conditions; however, their regulation and prognostic value in heart failure (HF) is unclear.MethodsUrinary and plasma CNP were measured in 109 healthy subjects and 208 patients with ADHF; the 95th percentile of CNP values from healthy subjects established the normal contemporary cutoffs. Patients with ADHF were stratified based on urinary and plasma CNP levels for clinical characterization and the assessment of risk for adverse outcomes.ResultsThere was no significant correlation between urinary and plasma CNP in both cohorts. Urinary and plasma CNP were significantly elevated in patients with ADHF, and both increased with disease severity and were positively correlated with plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Of the patients with ADHF, 23% had elevations in both urinary and plasma CNP, whereas 24% had normal CNP levels. During a median follow-up of 3 years, patients with elevated urinary and plasma CNP had a significantly higher risk of rehospitalization and/or death (HR: 1.79; P = 0.03) and rehospitalization (HR: 2.16; P = 0.01) after adjusting for age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, renal function, and plasma NT-proBNP. The C-statistic and integrated discrimination analyses further supported that the addition of urinary and plasma CNP to established risk models improved the prediction of adverse outcomes in patients with ADHF.ConclusionsUrinary and plasma CNP are differentially regulated in ADHF, and elevations in both provided independent prognostic value for predicting adverse outcomes.

Project description:To assess current management practice of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in multinational primary care (PC) and determine whether N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP)-guided referral of HFrEF patients from PC to a cardiologist could improve care, defined as adherence to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy. PRospective Evaluation of natriuretic peptide-based reFERral of patients with chronic HF in PC (PREFER) study enrolled HFrEF patients from PC considered clinically stable and those with NT-pro-BNP ≥600 pg/mL were referred to a cardiologist for optimisation of HF treatment. The primary outcome of adherence to ESC HF guidelines after referral to specialist was assessed at the second visit within 4 weeks of cardiologist's referral and no later than 6 months after the baseline visit. Based on futility interim analysis, the study was terminated early. In total, 1415 HFrEF patients from 223 PCs from 18 countries in Europe were enrolled. Of these, 1324 (96.9%) were considered clinically stable and 920 (65.0%) had NT-pro-BNP ≥600 pg/mL (mean: 2631 pg/mL). In total, 861 (60.8%) patients fulfilled both criteria and were referred to a cardiologist. Before cardiologist consultation, 10.1% of patients were on ESC guideline-recommended HFrEF medications and 2.7% were on recommended dosages of HFrEF medication (defined as ≥50% of ESC guideline-recommended dose). Postreferral, prescribed HFrEF drugs remained largely unchanged except for an increase in diuretics (+4.6%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (+7.9%). No significant increase in patients' adherence to guideline-defined drug combinations (11.2% post-referral vs 10.1% baseline) or drug combinations and dosages (3.3% postreferral vs 2.7% baseline) was observed after cardiologist consultation. PREFER demonstrates substantial suboptimal treatment of HFrEF patients in the real world. Referral of patients with elevated NT-pro-BNP levels from PC to cardiologist did not result in meaningful treatment optimisation for treatments with known mortality and morbidity benefit.

Project description:Background Patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction have high risk of rehospitalization or death. Despite guideline recommendations based on high-quality evidence, a substantial proportion of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction receive suboptimal care and/or do not comply with optimal care following hospitalization. Methods and Results This retrospective observational study identified 17 106 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction with an incident HF-related hospitalization using the Humana Medicare Advantage database (2008-2016). HF medication classes (beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) received in the year after hospitalization were recorded, and categorized by treatment intensity (ie, number of concomitant medication classes received: none [23% of patients; n=3987], monotherapy [22%; n=3777], dual therapy [41%; n=7056], or triple therapy [13%; n=2286]). Compared with no medication, risk of primary outcome (composite of death or rehospitalization) was significantly reduced (hazard ratio [95% CI]) with monotherapy (0.68 [0.64-0.71]), dual therapy (0.56 [0.53-0.59]), and triple therapy (0.45 [0.41-0.50]). Nearly half (46%) of patients who received post-discharge medication had no dose escalation. Overall, 59% of patients had follow-up with a primary care physician within 14 days of discharge, and 23% had follow-up with a cardiologist. Conclusions In real-world clinical practice, increasing treatment intensity reduced risk of death and rehospitalization among patients hospitalized for HF, though the use of guideline-recommended dual and triple HF therapy remained low. There are opportunities to improve post-discharge medical management for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction such as optimizing dose titration and improving post-discharge follow-up with providers.

Project description:AimsMildly dilated cardiomyopathy (MDCM) was characterized as a subset of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with systolic dysfunction and modest ventricular dilatation, of which the prognostic studies were limited. We aimed to compare the prognostic value of the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) between MDCM and DCM.Methods and resultsWe retrospectively included hospitalized patients diagnosed with DCM and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 50% at Fuwai Hospital from 2006 to 2017. MDCM was defined as left ventricular end-diastolic diameter index (LVEDDi) ≤ 33 mm/m2 in males and ≤34 mm/m2 in females. A total of 640 patients (median age 49 years, 24.8% female) were included in this study. At baseline, 110 cases (17%) were categorized as MDCM and 529 cases (83%) as DCM. Of 282 patients who had follow-up echocardiograms ≥ 6 months, 7 MDCM patients (11.1%) evolved to DCM and 70 DCM patients (32.0%) recovered to MDCM by the change of LVEDDi. Compared with DCM, patients with baseline MDCM had lower composite risks of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, and heart failure rehospitalization [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.93, P = 0.019]. Both hs-CRP and NT-proBNP were independently associated with the composite endpoint in the overall cohort (hs-CRP: adjusted HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.15, P = 0.036; NT-proBNP: adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.22, P = 0.019). After a propensity-score matching between MDCM and DCM, higher NT-proBNP (above the median) was significantly associated with the outcome in DCM patients (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.05-3.20, P = 0.034), but not in MDCM patients (HR 1.54, 95% CI 0.76-3.11, P = 0.227). On the contrary, higher hs-CRP (above the median) showed prognostic value for adverse events in MDCM patients (HR 3.19, 95% CI 1.52-6.66, P = 0.002), but not in DCM patients (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.61-1.79, P = 0.88).ConclusionsIn patients with MDCM, although no evidence suggested the prognostic role of NT-proBNP, higher level of hs-CRP was associated with outcome, supporting the use of hs-CRP in risk stratification for patients with MDCM.

Dataset Information

Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide vs history of heart failure hospitalization in a large real-world population.

Publications

Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide vs history of heart failure hospitalization in a large real-world population.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets