Dataset Information

Fully automated 3D aortic segmentation of 4D flow MRI for hemodynamic analysis using deep learning.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To generate fully automated and fast 4D-flow MRI-based 3D segmentations of the aorta using deep learning for reproducible quantification of aortic flow, peak velocity, and dimensions.

Methods

A total of 1018 subjects with aortic 4D-flow MRI (528 with bicuspid aortic valve, 376 with tricuspid aortic valve and aortic dilation, 114 healthy controls) comprised the data set. A convolutional neural network was trained to generate 3D aortic segmentations from 4D-flow data. Manual segmentations served as the ground truth (N = 499 training, N = 101 validation, N = 418 testing). Dice scores, Hausdorff distance, and average symmetrical surface distance were calculated to assess performance. Aortic flow, peak velocity, and lumen dimensions were quantified at the ascending, arch, and descending aorta and compared using Bland-Altman analysis. Interobserver variability of manual analysis was assessed on a subset of 40.

Results

Convolutional neural network segmentation required 0.438 ± 0.355 seconds versus 630 ± 254 seconds for manual analysis and demonstrated excellent performance with a median Dice score of 0.951 (0.930-0.966), Hausdorff distance of 2.80 (2.13-4.35), and average symmetrical surface distance of 0.176 (0.119-0.290). Excellent agreement was found for flow, peak velocity, and dimensions with low bias and limits of agreement less than 10% difference versus manual analysis. For aortic volume, limits of agreement were moderate within 16.3%. Interobserver variability (median Dice score: 0.950; Hausdorff distance: 2.45; and average symmetrical surface distance: 0.145) and convolutional neural network-based analysis (median Dice score: 0.953-0.959; Hausdorff distance: 2.24-2.91; and average symmetrical surface distance: 0.145-1.98 to observers) demonstrated similar reproducibility.

Conclusions

Deep learning enabled fast and automated 3D aortic segmentation from 4D-flow MRI, demonstrating its potential for efficient clinical workflows. Future studies should investigate its utility for other vasculature and multivendor applications.

SUBMITTER: Berhane H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7724647 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo enable fast and reliable assessment of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue compartments derived from whole-body MRI.Materials and methodsQuantification and localization of different adipose tissue compartments derived from whole-body MR images is of high interest in research concerning metabolic conditions. For correct identification and phenotyping of individuals at increased risk for metabolic diseases, a reliable automated segmentation of adipose tissue into subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue is required. In this work, a three-dimensional (3D) densely connected convolutional neural network (DCNet) is proposed to provide robust and objective segmentation. In this retrospective study, 1000 cases (average age, 66 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 523 women) from the Tuebingen Family Study database and the German Center for Diabetes research database and 300 cases (average age, 53 years ± 11; 152 women) from the German National Cohort (NAKO) database were collected for model training, validation, and testing, with transfer learning between the cohorts. These datasets included variable imaging sequences, imaging contrasts, receiver coil arrangements, scanners, and imaging field strengths. The proposed DCNet was compared to a similar 3D U-Net segmentation in terms of sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, and Dice overlap.ResultsFast (range, 5-7 seconds) and reliable adipose tissue segmentation can be performed with high Dice overlap (0.94), sensitivity (96.6%), specificity (95.1%), precision (92.1%), and accuracy (98.4%) from 3D whole-body MRI datasets (field of view coverage, 450 × 450 × 2000 mm). Segmentation masks and adipose tissue profiles are automatically reported back to the referring physician.ConclusionAutomated adipose tissue segmentation is feasible in 3D whole-body MRI datasets and is generalizable to different epidemiologic cohort studies with the proposed DCNet.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Phase contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is widely employed for flow quantification, but analysis typically requires time consuming manual segmentation which can require human correction. Advances in machine learning have markedly improved automated processing, but have yet to be applied to PC-CMR. This study tested a novel machine learning model for fully automated analysis of PC-CMR aortic flow. METHODS:A machine learning model was designed to track aortic valve borders based on neural network approaches. The model was trained in a derivation cohort encompassing 150 patients who underwent clinical PC-CMR then compared to manual and commercially-available automated segmentation in a prospective validation cohort. Further validation testing was performed in an external cohort acquired from a different site/CMR vendor. RESULTS:Among 190 coronary artery disease patients prospectively undergoing CMR on commercial scanners (84% 1.5T, 16% 3T), machine learning segmentation was uniformly successful, requiring no human intervention: Segmentation time was <?0.01?min/case (1.2?min for entire dataset); manual segmentation required 3.96?±?0.36?min/case (12.5?h for entire dataset). Correlations between machine learning and manual segmentation-derived flow approached unity (r?=?0.99, p?<?0.001). Machine learning yielded smaller absolute differences with manual segmentation than did commercial automation (1.85?±?1.80 vs. 3.33?±?3.18?mL, p?<?0.01): Nearly all (98%) of cases differed by ?5?mL between machine learning and manual methods. Among patients without advanced mitral regurgitation, machine learning correlated well (r?=?0.63, p?<?0.001) and yielded small differences with cine-CMR stroke volume (? 1.3?±?17.7?mL, p?=?0.36). Among advanced mitral regurgitation patients, machine learning yielded lower stroke volume than did volumetric cine-CMR (? 12.6?±?20.9?mL, p?=?0.005), further supporting validity of this method. Among the external validation cohort (n?=?80) acquired using a different CMR vendor, the algorithm yielded equivalently small differences (? 1.39?±?1.77?mL, p?=?0.4) and high correlations (r?=?0.99, p?<?0.001) with manual segmentation, including similar results in 20 patients with bicuspid or stenotic aortic valve pathology (? 1.71?±?2.25?mL, p?=?0.25). CONCLUSION:Fully automated machine learning PC-CMR segmentation performs robustly for aortic flow quantification - yielding rapid segmentation, small differences with manual segmentation, and identification of differential forward/left ventricular volumetric stroke volume in context of concomitant mitral regurgitation. Findings support use of machine learning for analysis of large scale CMR datasets.