Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a network meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Aim

To compare the efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with positive EGFR mutation.

Materials & methods

Following a systematic literature review until December 2019, we conducted a random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses (NMA). We ranked treatments for efficacy and safety based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

Results

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) improved survival outcomes with fewer grade 3 or higher adverse events compared to chemotherapy. Overall survival results suggest that osimertinib has the highest probability of being the most efficacious (SUCRA, 79.9%), followed by dacomitinib (SUCRA, 75.8%). Adverse events results suggest that osimertinib (SUCRA, 84.3%) and gefitinib (SUCRA, 78.9%) has the highest probability of being the safest.

Conclusion

In this NMA, we found that osimertinib is the most efficacious and safest EGFR-TKI. These results may guide clinicians in choosing the most appropriate treatment option among EGFR-TKIs for their patient's individual clinical characteristics.

SUBMITTER: Alanazi A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7724735 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a network meta-analysis.

Alanazi Abdullah A   Yunusa Ismaeel I   Elenizi Khaled K   Alzarea Abdulaziz I AI  

Lung cancer management 20201123 1


<h4>Aim</h4>To compare the efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with positive <i>EGFR</i> mutation.<h4>Materials & methods</h4>Following a systematic literature review until December 2019, we conducted a random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses (NMA). We ranked treatments for efficacy and safety based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).<h4  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7802134 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8195272 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5564798 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6617580 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5488763 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8050333 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5132035 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7709813 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6456063 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4425557 | biostudies-literature