Dataset Information

Generalized, focal, and combined epilepsies in families: New evidence for distinct genetic factors.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To determine the roles of shared and distinct genetic influences on generalized and focal epilepsy operating in individuals who manifest features of both types (combined epilepsies), and in families manifesting both generalized and focal epilepsies in separate individuals (mixed families).

Methods

We analyzed the deeply phenotyped Epi4K cohort of multiplex families (≥3 affected individuals per family) using methods that quantify the aggregation of phenotypes within families and the relatedness of individuals with different phenotypes within family pedigrees.

Results

The cohort included 281 families containing 1021 individuals with generalized (n = 484), focal (304), combined (51), or unclassified (182) epilepsies. The odds of combined epilepsy was higher in relatives of participants with combined epilepsy than in relatives of those with other epilepsy types (odds ratio [OR] 5.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-16.1, P = .004). Individuals with combined epilepsy co-occurred in families more often than expected by chance (P = .03). Within mixed families, individuals with each type of epilepsy were more closely related to relatives with the same type than to relatives with other types (P < .001).

Significance

These findings suggest that distinct genetic influences underlie the recently recognized entity of combined epilepsies, just as generalized epilepsies and focal epilepsies each have distinct genetic influences. Mixed families may in part reflect chance co-occurrence of these distinct genetic influences. These conclusions have important implications for molecular genetic studies aimed at identifying genetic determinants of the epilepsies.

SUBMITTER: Ellis CA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7725856 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rare genetic variants can cause epilepsy, and genetic testing has been widely adopted for severe, paediatric-onset epilepsies. The phenotypic consequences of common genetic risk burden for epilepsies and their potential future clinical applications have not yet been determined. Using polygenic risk scores (PRS) from a European-ancestry genome-wide association study in generalized and focal epilepsy, we quantified common genetic burden in patients with generalized epilepsy (GE-PRS) or focal epilepsy (FE-PRS) from two independent non-Finnish European cohorts (Epi25 Consortium, n = 5705; Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, n = 620; both compared to 20 435 controls). One Finnish-ancestry population isolate (Finnish-ancestry Epi25, n = 449; compared to 1559 controls), two European-ancestry biobanks (UK Biobank, n = 383 656; Vanderbilt biorepository, n = 49 494), and one Japanese-ancestry biobank (BioBank Japan, n = 168 680) were used for additional replications. Across 8386 patients with epilepsy and 622 212 population controls, we found and replicated significantly higher GE-PRS in patients with generalized epilepsy of European-ancestry compared to patients with focal epilepsy (Epi25: P = 1.64×10-15; Cleveland: P = 2.85×10-4; Finnish-ancestry Epi25: P = 1.80×10-4) or population controls (Epi25: P = 2.35×10-70; Cleveland: P = 1.43×10-7; Finnish-ancestry Epi25: P = 3.11×10-4; UK Biobank and Vanderbilt biorepository meta-analysis: P = 7.99×10-4). FE-PRS were significantly higher in patients with focal epilepsy compared to controls in the non-Finnish, non-biobank cohorts (Epi25: P = 5.74×10-19; Cleveland: P = 1.69×10-6). European ancestry-derived PRS did not predict generalized epilepsy or focal epilepsy in Japanese-ancestry individuals. Finally, we observed a significant 4.6-fold and a 4.5-fold enrichment of patients with generalized epilepsy compared to controls in the top 0.5% highest GE-PRS of the two non-Finnish European cohorts (Epi25: P = 2.60×10-15; Cleveland: P = 1.39×10-2). We conclude that common variant risk associated with epilepsy is significantly enriched in multiple cohorts of patients with epilepsy compared to controls-in particular for generalized epilepsy. As sample sizes and PRS accuracy continue to increase with further common variant discovery, PRS could complement established clinical biomarkers and augment genetic testing for patient classification, comorbidity research, and potentially targeted treatment.

Project description:ObjectiveAmong standard treatments for infantile spasms, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is reported as the best treatment, but ACTH is ineffective in one-half of the patients. To establish precision medicine, we examined pharmacoresistance of focal epileptic spasms (ES), generalized ES, and generalized ES combined with focal seizures, diagnosed based on the revised seizure classification of ILAE in 2017.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective nationwide study in Japan on the long-term seizure outcome of ES. Long-term seizure outcome was evaluated by seizure-free rate, seizure-free period, and Kaplan-Meier curve. Seizure-free was defined as seizure control for longer than 2 months.ResultsFrom the medical history of 501 patients, 325 patients had generalized ES only (GES group) at the start of the first treatment, 125 patients had generalized ES after focal seizure onset (FS-GES group), seven patients had focal ES after focal seizure onset (FS-FES group), and 24 patients had generalized ES combined with focal seizures after focal seizure onset (FS-GES + FS group). Seizure-free period of ES (generalized ES and focal ES) [mean (95% confidence interval)] was 2.7 (0.0-5.4) months in GES group, 1.1 (0.1-2.2) months in FS-GES group, 1.0 (0.2-1.9) months in FS-GES + FS group, and 0.1 (-0.2-0.5) months in FS-FES group. Seizure-free rate, seizure-free period, and Kaplan-Meier curve of generalized ES were almost the same in GES group and FS-GES group, with characteristics of superior response to ACTH. Mean seizure-free period of generalized ES combined with focal seizures was significantly shorter in FS-GES + FS group than in GES group. Mean seizure-free period of focal ES in FS-FES group was extremely short with exceedingly early relapse.SignificancePharmacoresistance was different in generalized ES, focal ES, and generalized ES combined with focal seizures. ES with focal features or with focal seizures may have focal lesions, thus consider surgical options earlier in the course.

Project description:Genetic generalized epilepsies (GGEs) include well-established epilepsy syndromes with generalized onset seizures: childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE), myoclonic absence epilepsy, epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (Jeavons syndrome), generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and exome sequencing have identified 48 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with GGE. However, these studies were mainly based on non-admixed, European, and Asian populations. Thus, it remains unclear whether these results apply to patients of other origins. This study aims to evaluate whether these previous results could be replicated in a cohort of admixed Brazilian patients with GGE. We obtained SNP-array data from 87 patients with GGE, compared with 340 controls from the BIPMed public dataset. We could directly access genotypes of 17 candidate SNPs, available in the SNP array, and the remaining 31 SNPs were imputed using the BEAGLE v5.1 software. We performed an association test by logistic regression analysis, including the first five principal components as covariates. Furthermore, to expand the analysis of the candidate regions, we also interrogated 14,047 SNPs that flank the candidate SNPs (1 Mb). The statistical power was evaluated in terms of odds ratio and minor allele frequency (MAF) by the genpwr package. Differences in SNP frequencies between Brazilian and Europeans, sub-Saharan African, and Native Americans were evaluated by a two-proportion Z-test. We identified nine flanking SNPs, located on eight candidate regions, which presented association signals that passed the Bonferroni correction (rs12726617; rs9428842; rs1915992; rs1464634; rs6459526; rs2510087; rs9551042; rs9888879; and rs8133217; p-values <3.55e-06). In addition, the two-proportion Z-test indicates that the lack of association of the remaining candidate SNPs could be due to different genomic backgrounds observed in admixed Brazilians. This is the first time that candidate SNPs for GGE are analyzed in an admixed Brazilian population, and we could successfully replicate the association signals in eight candidate regions. In addition, our results provide new insights on how we can account for population structure to improve risk stratification estimation in admixed individuals.