Dataset Information

Detection of additional abnormalities or co-morbidities in women with suspected intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Current guidelines recommend viral, autoimmune, coagulation and liver ultrasound testing in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy to exclude alternative diagnoses.

Methods

Electronic health records were searched for investigations and diagnoses in women with raised bile acid concentrations (>10 µmol/L) between January 2016 and December 2017 at two UK maternity units.

Results

Five hundred and thirty-one women had a raised bile acid concentration (median (IQR): 18 (13-32 µmol/L)) at a median gestation of 35.1 (IQR 31.8-37.0) weeks. Out of 531 women, 250 (47.1%) had full virology, autoimmune and ultrasound tests, and 348 (65.5%) had coagulation performed. Positive hepatitis B and C results were previously known. No new Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus or hepatitis A diagnoses were made. There were 11 positive autoimmune results, but no new diagnoses. No woman had an unexplained prolonged prothrombin time. No ultrasound liver (n = 38) or gallbladder (n = 85) abnormalities were of acute clinical significance.

Conclusion

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy investigations provided no new diagnoses that influenced clinical management during pregnancy.

SUBMITTER: Conti-Ramsden F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7726172 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIntrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, characterised by maternal pruritus and increased serum bile acid concentrations, is associated with increased rates of stillbirth, preterm birth, and neonatal unit admission. Ursodeoxycholic acid is widely used as a treatment without an adequate evidence base. We aimed to evaluate whether ursodeoxycholic acid reduces adverse perinatal outcomes in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.MethodsWe did a double-blind, multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled trial at 33 hospital maternity units in England and Wales. We recruited women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, who were aged 18 years or older and with a gestational age between 20 weeks and 40 weeks and 6 days, with a singleton or twin pregnancy and no known lethal fetal anomaly. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to ursodeoxycholic acid or placebo, given as two oral tablets a day at an equivalent dose of 500 mg twice a day. The dose could be increased or decreased at the clinician's discretion, to a maximum of four tablets and a minimum of one tablet a day. We recommended that treatment should be continued from enrolment until the infant's birth. The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal death (in-utero fetal death after randomisation or known neonatal death up to 7 days after birth), preterm delivery (<37 weeks' gestation), or neonatal unit admission for at least 4 h (from birth until hospital discharge). Each infant was counted once within this composite. All analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry, number 91918806.FindingsBetween Dec 23, 2015, and Aug 7, 2018, 605 women were enrolled and randomly allocated to receive ursodeoxycholic acid (n=305) or placebo (n=300). The primary outcome analysis included 304 women and 322 infants in the ursodeoxycholic acid group, and 300 women and 318 infants in the placebo group (consent to use data was withdrawn for 1 woman and 2 infants). The primary composite outcome occurred in 74 (23%) of 322 infants in the ursodeoxycholic acid group and 85 (27%) of 318 infants in the placebo group (adjusted risk ratio 0·85 [95% CI 0·62-1·15]). Two serious adverse events were reported in the ursodeoxycholic acid group and six serious adverse events were reported in the placebo group; no serious adverse events were regarded as being related to treatment.InterpretationTreatment with ursodeoxycholic acid does not reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Therefore, its routine use for this condition should be reconsidered.FundingNational Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme.