Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
Methods: Experimental research was conducted via a controlled parallel group study. The total sample of 104 senior-year students (Chinese) majoring in clinical medicine was randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group was exposed to the MF?+?CBL model and the control group to the LBL model. Overall, the results were assessed after an 8-week course via a student self-assessment questionnaire, a satisfaction survey and the final examination.
Results: The experimental group generally performed better than the control group on the student self-assessment (P<0.05), satisfaction survey (P<0.05), and final examination (80.02?±?3.77 vs 73.65?±?3.69, P?=?0.000). The open question at the end of the questionnaire revealed that a small number of students did not favour the MF?+?CBL model due to its time- and energy-consuming features.
Conclusions: Compared with LBL, the MF?+?CBL model was an innovative teaching method that promoted more comprehensive quality development. It represents an alternative model for optimizing the capacity of future paediatric doctors.
SUBMITTER: Pan Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7727213 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Pan Yuan Y Chen Xiuqi X Wei Qiuwen Q Zhao Jinmin J Chen Xun X
BMC medical education 20201209 1
<h4>Background</h4>In view of the harsh reality Chinese paediatricians face, the challenge of paediatric education is about instilling not only knowledge and clinical skills but also resilience and beliefs. The aim of the study is to explore a more effective method than the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) model for optimizing educational outcomes by establishing an innovative, comprehensive, case-based learning (CBL) model combined with the micro-film technique (MF + CBL). This approach ...[more]