Dataset Information

Transformative Global Health Pedagogy: A Dinner Curriculum for Medical Students and Residents.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

The Hiatt Residency in Global Health Equity program at Brigham and Women's Hospital partnered with Loyola University Medical Center and the Stritch School of Medicine to build and share an innovative global health dinner curriculum (GHDC) based on the methodologies of transformative learning theory. This educational approach encourages trainees to critically analyze their frame of reference and has the potential to create practitioners equipped to advance health equity.

Methods

The GHDC explored broad global health (GH) topics through facilitated discussions with faculty and an experienced guest discussant over dinner. Medical students and internal medicine residents attended sessions based on their availability and interest. Participants completed surveys before and after every dinner. Comprehensive post-curriculum surveys were collected after participants had been involved for at least 1 year.

Results

In 2017-2018, 98% of the 37 participants preferred the dinner-style learning session to a didactic-style lecture (97% of the 37 participants in 2018-2019). Eighty-five percent (2017-2018) agreed or strongly agreed that dinners provided them with new knowledge on a GH topic (92% in 2018-2019). Seventy-two percent (2017-2018) agreed that the dinner introduced them to a new potential mentor in GH (66% in 2018-2019).

Discussion

The GHDC has been particularly successful in introducing participants to unfamiliar areas of medicine and new mentors. A second strength is its accessibility to medical students and residents. Its dependence on local resources allows versatility and customization; however, this trait also makes it difficult to prepackage the curriculum for interested institutions.

SUBMITTER: Frank PJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7727609 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Transformative Global Health Pedagogy: A Dinner Curriculum for Medical Students and Residents.

Frank Peter J PJ Schreck Katherine E KE Steinmetz Alexis A Carlson Erik S ES Stasieluk Conrad C Borah Brian B Reiser Hannah H Garcia Lucia L Kafensztok Ruth R Medernach Brian B Palazuelos Daniel D

MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources 20201203

<h4>Introduction</h4>The Hiatt Residency in Global Health Equity program at Brigham and Women's Hospital partnered with Loyola University Medical Center and the Stritch School of Medicine to build and share an innovative global health dinner curriculum (GHDC) based on the methodologies of transformative learning theory. This educational approach encourages trainees to critically analyze their frame of reference and has the potential to create practitioners equipped to advance health equity.<h4>M ...[more]

PMID: 33324750

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThere is increasing interest in global health teaching among medical schools and their students. Schools in the UK and internationally are considering the best structure, methods and content of global health courses. Academic work in this area, however, has tended to either be normative (specifying what global health teaching ought to look like) or descriptive (of a particular intervention, new module, elective, etc.).MethodsWhile a number of studies have explored student perspectives on global health teaching, these have often relied on tools such as questionnaires that generate little in-depth evidence. This study instead used qualitative methods to explore medical student perspectives on global health in the context of a new global health module established in the core medical curriculum at a UK medical school.ResultsFifth year medical students participated in a structured focus group session and semi-structured interviews designed to explore their knowledge and learning about global health issues, as well as their wider perspectives on these issues and their relevance to professional development. While perspectives on global health ranged from global health 'advocate' to 'sceptic', all of the students acknowledged the challenges of prioritising global health within a busy curriculum.ConclusionsStudents are highly alert to the diverse epistemological issues that underpin global health. For some students, such interdisciplinarity is fundamental to understanding contemporary health and healthcare. For others, global health is merely a topic of geographic relevance. Furthermore, some students appeared to accept global health as a specialist area only relevant to professionals working overseas, while others considered it to be an essential part of working in the globalised world and therefore relevant to all medical professionals. Students also clearly noted that including 'soft' subjects and more discursive approaches to teaching and learning often sits awkwardly in a programme where 'harder' forms of knowledge and didactic methods tend to dominate. This suggests that more work needs to be done to explain the relevance of global health to medical students at the very beginning of their studies.

Project description:BackgroundThe successful integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice is contingent upon physicians' comprehension of AI principles and its applications. Therefore, it is essential for medical education curricula to incorporate AI topics and concepts, providing future physicians with the foundational knowledge and skills needed. However, there is a knowledge gap in the current understanding and availability of structured AI curriculum frameworks tailored for medical education, which serve as vital guides for instructing and facilitating the learning process.ObjectiveThe overall aim of this study is to synthesize knowledge from the literature on curriculum frameworks and current educational programs that focus on the teaching and learning of AI for medical students, residents, and practicing physicians.MethodsWe followed a validated framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for scoping reviews. An information specialist performed a comprehensive search from 2000 to May 2023 in the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Scopus as well as the gray literature. Papers were limited to English and French languages. This review included papers that describe curriculum frameworks for teaching and learning AI in medicine, irrespective of country. All types of papers and study designs were included, except conference abstracts and protocols. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts, read the full texts, and extracted data using a validated data extraction form. Disagreements were resolved by consensus, and if this was not possible, the opinion of a third reviewer was sought. We adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist for reporting the results.ResultsOf the 5104 papers screened, 21 papers relevant to our eligibility criteria were identified. In total, 90% (19/21) of the papers altogether described 30 current or previously offered educational programs, and 10% (2/21) of the papers described elements of a curriculum framework. One framework describes a general approach to integrating AI curricula throughout the medical learning continuum and another describes a core curriculum for AI in ophthalmology. No papers described a theory, pedagogy, or framework that guided the educational programs.ConclusionsThis review synthesizes recent advancements in AI curriculum frameworks and educational programs within the domain of medical education. To build on this foundation, future researchers are encouraged to engage in a multidisciplinary approach to curriculum redesign. In addition, it is encouraged to initiate dialogues on the integration of AI into medical curriculum planning and to investigate the development, deployment, and appraisal of these innovative educational programs.International registered report identifier (irrid)RR2-10.11124/JBIES-22-00374.

Project description:BackgroundOngoing developments in medical education recognize the move to curricula that support self-regulated learning processes, skills of thinking, and the ability to adapt and navigate uncertain situations as much as the knowledge base of learners. Difficulties encountered in pursuing this reform, especially for pharmacology, include the tendency of beginner learners not to ask higher-order questions and the potential incongruency between creating authentic spaces for self-directed learning and providing external expert guidance. We tested the feasibility of developing, implementing, and sustaining an innovative model of social pedagogy as a strategy to address these challenges.MethodsConstructivism, communities of practice, and networked learning theory were selected as lenses for development of the model. Three hundred sixty-five first-year medical students participated between 2014 and 2018; they were introduced to pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics via 15 online modules that each included: learning objectives, a clinical vignette, teaching video, cumulative concept map, and small group wiki assignment. Five-person communities organized around the 15 wiki assignments were a key component where learners answered asynchronous, case-based questions that touched iteratively on Bloom's cognitive taxonomy levels. The social pedagogy model's wiki assignments were explored using abductive qualitative data analysis.ResultsQualitative analysis revealed that learners acquired and applied a conceptual framework for approaching pharmacology as a discipline, and demonstrated adaptive mastery by evaluating and interacting competently with unfamiliar drug information. Learners and faculty acquired habits of self-directed assessment seeking and learner-centered coaching, respectively; specifically, the model taught learners to look outward to peers, faculty, and external sources of information for credible and constructive feedback, and that this feedback could be trusted as a basis to direct performance improvement. 82-94% of learners rated the social pedagogy-based curriculum valuable.ConclusionsThis social pedagogy model is agnostic with regard to pharmacology and type of health professional learner; therefore, we anticipate its benefits to be transferable to other disciplines.

Project description:ObjectivesStudents and residents rotating through infectious diseases (ID) electives are instructed primarily by participation in rounds and clinics, with teaching focused on diseases encountered. This "you get what you get" approach allows learners to apply knowledge directly to patient care, however, may miss topics encountered in standardized testing. This multisite study investigates the use of asynchronous web-based learning modules and its impact on student and resident knowledge.MethodsStudents and residents rotating through an ID elective were assigned to their standard elective (old) or asked to complete asynchronous web-based learning modules in addition to the standard curriculum (new). Learners submitted pre- and post-tests and scores were tabulated. In the following academic year, learners at the host site were provided the learning modules and a post-elective survey.ResultsNine learners (100%) completed the pre-test and 5 (55.6%) completed the post-test in the standard (old) curriculum group, while 15 (100%) completed the pre-test and post-test in the new curriculum group. The mean percentage change in accuracy was 9% and 5.3% in the old and new curricula, respectively. Most (94%) survey respondents recommended continued use of the curriculum and expansion to other subspecialty electives.ConclusionsSubspecialty electives have multiple purposes including assisting learners in exploring careers, providing a well-rounded medical experience, or preparing learners for content in standardized tests. Consistent curricula are not always provided with electives to supplement the clinical experience. Our web curriculum was well-received with perceived knowledge gain, though with very small pre-post-test groups a score improvement could not be determined. An asynchronous online curriculum for learners in ID was feasible and well-received among faculty, and learners felt their knowledge was enhanced. Content areas supplemented those encountered during the ID elective. While an improvement in post-test scores was not demonstrated, learners and faculty felt modules were beneficial.

Dataset Information

Transformative Global Health Pedagogy: A Dinner Curriculum for Medical Students and Residents.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Publications

Transformative Global Health Pedagogy: A Dinner Curriculum for Medical Students and Residents.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets