Salvage circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for refractory dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Bechara R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7729848 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:With the ameliorated resectability prowess of endoscopic techniques, a myriad of diseases previously treated by major ablative surgeries are now endoscopically curable. Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) is a relatively new technique that has diversified endoscopic application. Although ESTD has frequently been used for the resection of esophageal neoplastic lesions, the clinical evidence pertaining to its efficacy in the treatment of circumferential Barrett's esophagus remains sparse. In this study, we evaluated ESTD as a potential therapeutic technique in patients with Barrett's esophagus-related high-grade dysplasia. The tunneling strategy helped achieve complete en bloc resection at an increased dissection speed, without any procedural complications. This article illustrates that ESTD can be a feasible, safe, and effective treatment for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Future research should aim to stratify the potential risks and complications associated with this optimization of endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with superficial esophageal lesions.
| S-EPMC7430079 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7732717 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5990489 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background & aimsRecommended surveillance intervals after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) after endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) are largely not evidence-based. Using recurrence rates in a multicenter international Barrett's esophagus (BE) CE-IM cohort, we aimed to generate optimal intervals for surveillance.MethodsPatients with dysplastic BE undergoing EET and achieving CE-IM from prospectively maintained databases at 5 tertiary-care centers in the United States and the United Kingdom were included. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was estimated, accounting for the unknown date of actual recurrence that lies between the dates of current and previous endoscopy. This cumulative incidence of recurrence subsequently was used to estimate the proportion of patients with undetected recurrence for various surveillance intervals over 5 years. Intervals were selected that minimized recurrences remaining undetected for more than 6 months. Actual patterns of post-CE-IM follow-up evaluation are described.ResultsA total of 498 patients (with baseline low-grade dysplasia, 115 patients; high-grade dysplasia [HGD], 288 patients; and intramucosal adenocarcinoma [IMCa], 95 patients) were included. Any recurrence occurred in 27.1% and dysplastic recurrence occurred in 8.4% over a median of 2.6 years of follow-up evaluation. For pre-ablation HGD/IMCa, intervals of 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and then annually, resulted in no patients with dysplastic recurrence undetected for more than 6 months, comparable with current guideline recommendations despite a 33% reduction in the number of surveillance endoscopies. For pre-ablation low-grade dysplasia, intervals of 1, 2, and 4 years balanced endoscopic burden and undetected recurrence risk.ConclusionsLengthening post-CE-IM surveillance intervals would reduce the endoscopic burden after CE-IM with comparable rates of recurrent HGD/IMCa. Future guidelines should consider reduced surveillance frequency.
| S-EPMC10203864 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7221320 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5990426 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background It remains controversial whether endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is still appropriate for circumferential superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms (SESCN), and few studies compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of ESD with radical surgery. Methods A total of 140 patients with SESCN who underwent ESD or surgery between February 2014 and October 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The characteristics of patients, operative time, postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and quality of life (QOL) were compared between the ESD and surgery groups. The effect of different methods to prevent esophageal stenosis after ESD were analysed. Results Drinking, family history of cancer, macroscopic type, and intrapapillary capillary loop (IPCL) type were independent risk factors for deep submucosal invasion (SM ≥ 200 μm). Smoking and IPCL type were independent predictive factors for angiolymphatic invasion. The average operative time of ESD was significantly shorter than that of surgery (174.5 ± 51.16 min vs. 255.9 ± 88.18 min, p < 0.001). The incidence of perioperative complications in ESD group was significantly lower than that in surgery group (5.5% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.015). The ESD group had significantly better functional scale scores for emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and global health status, and lower rates of pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, diarrhoea, reflux, and trouble with taste than the surgery group. No significant difference in OS and RFS between ESD and surgery group. Conclusions ESD can significantly shorten the operative time and reduce perioperative complications. Additionally, on the premise of using appropriate measures to prevent postoperative stenosis, ESD can be the first choice for the treatment of SESCN, which could provide better QOL, and the long-term prognosis of ESD is no less than that of surgery.
| S-EPMC9860878 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Liposarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas occurring in adults, but it rarely occurs in the gastrointestinal tract and more uncommonly in the esophagus. To the best of our knowledge, there are only 19 reported cases of esophageal liposarcoma in the literature published in English language up to the year 2008, and they were all treated by surgical methods. Here, we report a case of primary liposarcoma of the esophagus which was treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). ESD was well tolerated in this patient, suggesting that it may be a therapeutic option for primary esophageal sarcomas.
| S-EPMC3678071 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAfter endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE), endoscopic biopsy samples are obtained to assess response to therapy. Whether these biopsies are of adequate depth to assess efficacy is unknown.ObjectiveTo compare the depth of endoscopic biopsy samples after RFA with those of untreated controls and to determine the prevalence of subepithelial structures in endoscopic biopsy fragments.DesignSecondary analysis of the AIM Dysplasia Trial, a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled study.SettingNineteen treatment centers.PatientsSubjects with dysplastic BE, either status post RFA or ablation naïve (sham).Main outcome measurementsThe proportion of biopsy samples demonstrating subepithelial structures, stratified by tissue type (columnar vs squamous) in sham- and RFA-treated subjects.ResultsA total of 5648 biopsy fragments were analyzed from 113 subjects (78 RFA, 35 sham; mean 50.0 fragments per subject). Most fragments (4653, 82.4%) contained subepithelium. Squamous biopsy samples from RFA and sham subjects demonstrated subepithelium at similar rates (78.4% vs 79.1%, respectively, P = not significant [NS]). Columnar biopsy samples from RFA and sham subjects also included subepithelium at similar rates (99.0% vs 98.8%, respectively, P = NS). Regardless of treatment assignment, more columnar than squamous biopsy samples demonstrated subepithelium (98.8% vs 78.5%, P < .001).LimitationsBiopsy samples were not individually mounted.ConclusionsIn both squamous and columnar tissue, endoscopic biopsy samples after RFA were as likely to demonstrate subepithelium as untreated controls. Almost 80% of all biopsy samples were adequate to evaluate for subsquamous intestinal metaplasia. The primary determinant of biopsy depth is the type of epithelium that underwent biopsy, with squamous less likely to yield subepithelium than columnar. Biopsy samples after RFA appear to be of adequate depth to assess response to therapy. (Clinical trial registration number NCT00282672.).
| S-EPMC3093936 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Esophageal stricture is a common complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), especially in full circumferential ESD. This study investigated fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for preventing post-ESD esophageal stricture. Twelve Bama minipigs were randomly divided into two groups, which underwent full circumferential ESD in the distal esophagus. In group A, an FCSEMS with ADM was placed at the mucosal defect, whereas group B underwent standard FCSEMS placement. The stent was removed during gastroscopy 2 weeks after the ESD procedure. At the fourth week, gastroscopy was repeated to evaluate local healing and stenosis. The animals were sacrificed, esophageal specimens were obtained for macroscopic and histological evaluation, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were quantified. Four weeks post ESD, dysphagia occurrence was lesser in group A than in group B. Group A demonstrated lesser esophageal stricture on macroscopic evaluation (21.02 ± 16.65% vs. 57.41 ± 8.48%, p = 0.001) in the form of enhanced re-epithelization (99.13 ± 0.98% vs. 96.63 ± 1.64%, p = 0.009), diminished submucosal fibrosis (1117.53 ± 188.83 um vs. 1834.69 ± 421.99 um, p = 0.003), and attenuated inflammatory infiltration (121.00 ± 30.66 vs. 188.17 ± 64.92, p = 0.045). The increase in the serum CRP level was lower in group A than in group B at 4 weeks post-ESD. FCSEMS combined with ADM can enhance re-epithelization in the process of wound healing and significantly reduce the degree of esophageal stenosis after circumferential ESD. This study provided important preclinical findings for subsequent clinical trials.
| S-EPMC9108161 | biostudies-literature