Dataset Information

Understanding the asthmatic response to an experimental rhinovirus infection: Exploring the effects of blocking IgE.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Rhinovirus frequently causes asthma exacerbations among children and young adults who are allergic. The interaction between allergen and rhinovirus-induced symptoms and inflammation over time is unclear.

Objective

Our aim was to compare the response to an experimental inoculation with rhinovirus-16 in allergic asthmatics with the response in healthy controls and to evaluate the effects of administrating omalizumab before and during the infection.

Methods

Two clinical trials were run in parallel. In one of these trials, the response to an experimental inoculation with rhinovirus-16 among asthmatics with high levels of total IgE was compared to the response in healthy controls. The other trial compared the effects of administering omalizumab versus placebo to asthmatics in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled investigation. The primary outcome for both trials compared lower respiratory tract symptoms (LRTSs) between study groups over the first 4 days of infection.

Results

Frequent comparisons of symptoms, lung function, and blood eosinophil counts revealed differences that were more pronounced among allergic asthmatics than among controls by days 2 and 3 after virus inoculation. Additionally, an augmentation of upper respiratory tract symptom scores and LRTS scores occurred among the atopic asthmatics versus the controls during the resolution of symptoms (P < .01 for upper respiratory symptom tract scores and P < .001 for LRTS scores). The beneficial effects of administering omalizumab on reducing LRTSs and improving lung function were strongest over the first 4 days.

Conclusions

LRTSs and blood eosinophil counts were augmented and lung function was reduced among allergic asthmatics early after rhinovirus inoculation but increased late in the infection during symptom resolution. The effect of administering omalizumab on the response to rhinovirus was most pronounced during the early/innate phase of the infection.

SUBMITTER: Heymann PW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7733370 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe nature of bronchial mucosal inflammation and its physiologic and clinical significance in rhinovirus-induced asthma exacerbations is unclear. We investigated bronchial mucosal inflammatory response and its association with physiologic and clinical outcomes in an experimental model of rhinovirus-induced asthma exacerbations.MethodsWe used immunohistochemistry methods to detect phenotypes of inflammatory cells infiltrating the bronchial mucosa before and after experimental rhinovirus infection in 10 subjects with asthma and 15 normal subjects.ResultsCompared with baseline, rhinovirus infection significantly increased the number of epithelial (P = .005) and subepithelial (P = .017) neutrophils in subjects with asthma only and subepithelial CD68+ macrophages in both subjects with asthma (P = .009) and normal subjects (P = .018) but more so in those with asthma (P = .021). Numbers of CD45+, CD68+, and CD20+ cells; neutrophils; and eosinophils at day 4 postinfection were positively associated with virus load (r = 0.50-0.72, P = .016-0.03). At acute infection in subjects with asthma, CD4+ cells correlated with chest symptom scores (r = 0.69, P = .029), the fall in the 10% fall in FEV1 (PC10) correlated with neutrophils (r = -0.89, P = .029), the PC10 correlated inversely with CD4+ (r = -0.67, P = .023) and CD8+ cells (r = -0.65, P = .03), the 20% fall in FEV1 was inversely associated with CD20+ cells (r = -0.65, P = .03), and higher epithelial CD8+ cell counts were significantly associated with a greater maximum fall in FEV1 (r = -0.72, P = .03), whereas higher subepithelial mast cell counts were significantly associated with a lower maximum percent fall in peak expiratory flow (r = 0.8, P = .024).ConclusionsIn subjects with asthma, rhinovirus infection induces bronchial mucosal neutrophilia and more severe monocyte/macrophage infiltration than in normal subjects. Airway neutrophils, eosinophils, and T and B lymphocytes during infection are related to virus load and physiologic and clinical severity, whereas mast cells are related to greater lung function.