Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The Influence of Predictability and Controllability on Stress Responses to the Aversive Component of a Virtual Fence.


ABSTRACT: To ensure animal welfare is not compromised, virtual fencing must be predictable and controllable, and this is achieved through associative learning. To assess the influence of predictability and controllability on physiological and behavioral responses to the aversive component of a virtual fence, two methods of training animals were compared. In the first method, positive punishment training involved sheep learning that after an audio stimulus, an electrical stimulus would follow only when they did not respond by stopping or turning at the virtual fence (predictable controllability). In the second method, classical conditioning was used to associate an audio stimulus with an electrical stimulus on all occasions (predictable uncontrollability). Eighty Merino ewes received one of the following treatments: control (no training and no stimuli in testing); positive punishment training with an audio stimulus in testing (PP); classical conditioning training with only an audio stimulus in testing (CC1); and classical conditioning training with an audio stimulus followed by electrical stimulus in testing (CC2). The stimuli were applied manually with an electronic collar. Training occurred on 4 consecutive days with one session per sheep per day. Sheep were then assessed for stress responses to the cues by measuring plasma cortisol, body temperature and behaviors. Predictable controllability (PP) sheep showed no differences in behavioral and physiological responses compared with the control treatment (P < 0.05). Predictable uncontrollability of receiving the aversive stimulus (CC2) induced a higher cortisol and body temperature response compared to the control but was not different to CC1 and PP treatments. CC2 treatment sheep showed a higher number of turning behaviors (P < 0.001), and more time spent running (P < 0.001) than the control and PP treatment groups, indicating that predictability without controllability was stressful. The behavior results also indicate that predicting the event without receiving it (CC1) was less stressful than predicting the event then receiving it (CC2), suggesting that there is a cost to confirmation of uncontrollability. These results demonstrate that a situation of predictability and controllability such as experienced when an animal successfully learns to avoid the aversive component of a virtual fence, induces a comparatively minimal stress response and does not compromise animal welfare.

SUBMITTER: Kearton T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7733987 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

The Influence of Predictability and Controllability on Stress Responses to the Aversive Component of a Virtual Fence.

Kearton Tellisa T   Marini Danila D   Cowley Frances F   Belson Sue S   Keshavarzi Hamideh H   Mayes Bonnie B   Lee Caroline C  

Frontiers in veterinary science 20201130


To ensure animal welfare is not compromised, virtual fencing must be predictable and controllable, and this is achieved through associative learning. To assess the influence of predictability and controllability on physiological and behavioral responses to the aversive component of a virtual fence, two methods of training animals were compared. In the first method, positive punishment training involved sheep learning that after an audio stimulus, an electrical stimulus would follow only when the  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4746312 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8336412 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4896936 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7804016 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4992784 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7091527 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10090419 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7943366 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7785729 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6266906 | biostudies-literature