Dataset Information

Canonical and DLPNO-Based Composite Wavefunction Methods Parametrized against Large and Chemically Diverse Training Sets. 2: Correlation-Consistent Basis Sets, Core-Valence Correlation, and F12 Alternatives.

ABSTRACT: A hierarchy of wavefunction composite methods (cWFT), based on G4-type cWFT methods available for elements H through Rn, was recently reported by the present authors [ J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 2020, 16, 4238]. We extend this hierarchy by considering the inner-shell correlation energy in the second-order Møller-Plesset correction and replacing the Weigend-Ahlrichs def2-mZVPP(D) basis sets used with complete basis set extrapolation from augmented correlation-consistent core-valence triple-?, aug-cc-pwCVTZ(-PP), and quadruple-?, aug-cc-pwCVQZ(-PP), basis sets, thus creating cc-G4-type methods. For the large and chemically diverse GMTKN55 benchmark suite, they represent a substantial further improvement and bring WTMAD2 (weighted mean absolute deviation) down below 1 kcal/mol. Intriguingly, the lion's share of the improvement comes from better capture of valence correlation; the inclusion of core-valence correlation is almost an order of magnitude less important. These robust correlation-consistent cWFT methods approach the CCSD(T) complete basis limit with just one or a few fitted parameters. Particularly, the DLPNO variants such as cc-G4-T-DLPNO are applicable to fairly large molecules at a modest computational cost, as is (for a reduced range of elements) a different variant using MP2-F12/cc-pVTZ-F12 for the MP2 component.

SUBMITTER: Semidalas E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7735707 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Canonical and DLPNO-Based Composite Wavefunction Methods Parametrized against Large and Chemically Diverse Training Sets. 2: Correlation-Consistent Basis Sets, Core-Valence Correlation, and F12 Alternatives.

Semidalas Emmanouil E Martin Jan M L JML

Journal of chemical theory and computation 20201117 12

A hierarchy of wavefunction composite methods (cWFT), based on G4-type cWFT methods available for elements H through Rn, was recently reported by the present authors [ <i>J. Chem. Theor. Comput.</i> 2020, 16, 4238]. We extend this hierarchy by considering the inner-shell correlation energy in the second-order Møller-Plesset correction and replacing the Weigend-Ahlrichs def2-<i>m</i>ZVPP(D) basis sets used with complete basis set extrapolation from augmented correlation-consistent core-valence tr ...[more]

PMID: 33200931

Similar Datasets

Project description:The large and chemically diverse GMTKN55 benchmark was used as a training set for parametrizing composite wave function thermochemistry protocols akin to G4(MP2)XK theory (Chan, B.; Karton, A.; Raghavachari, K. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 4478-4484). On account of their availability for elements H through Rn, Karlsruhe def2 basis sets were employed. Even after reparametrization, the GMTKN55 WTMAD2 (weighted mean absolute deviation, type 2) for G4(MP2)-XK is actually inferior to that of the best rung-4 DFT functional, ?B97M-V. By increasing the basis set for the MP2 part to def2-QZVPPD, we were able to substantially improve performance at modest cost (if an RI-MP2 approximation is made), with WTMAD2 for this G4(MP2)-XK-D method now comparable to the better rung-5 functionals (albeit at greater cost). A three-tier approach with a scaled MP3/def2-TZVPP intermediate step, however, leads to a G4(MP3)-D method that is markedly superior to even the best double hybrids ?B97M(2) and revDSD-PBEP86-D4. Evaluating the CCSD(T) component with a triple-?, rather than split-valence, basis set yields only a modest further improvement that is incommensurate with the drastic increase in computational cost. G4(MP3)-D and G4(MP2)-XK-D have about 40% better WTMAD2, at similar or lower computational cost, than their counterparts G4 and G4(MP2), respectively: detailed comparison reveals that the difference lies in larger molecules due to basis set incompleteness error. An E2/{T,Q} extrapolation and a CCSD(T)/def2-TZVP step provided the G4-T method of high accuracy and with just three fitted parameters. Using KS orbitals in MP2 leads to the G4(MP3|KS)-D method, which entirely eliminates the CCSD(T) step and has no steps costlier than scaled MP3; this shows a path forward to further improvements in double-hybrid density functional methods. None of our final selections require an empirical HLC correction; this cuts the number of empirical parameters in half and avoids discontinuities on potential energy surfaces. G4-T-DLPNO, a variant in which post-MP2 corrections are evaluated at the DLPNO-CCSD(T) level, achieves nearly the accuracy of G4-T but is applicable to much larger systems.

Project description:Second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) is the most expedient wave function-based method for considering electron correlation in quantum chemical calculations and, as such, provides a cost-effective framework to assess the effects of basis sets on correlation energies, for which the complete basis set (CBS) limit can commonly only be obtained via extrapolation techniques. Software packages providing MP2 energies are commonly based on atom-centered bases with innate issues related to possible basis set superposition errors (BSSE), especially in the case of weakly bonded systems. Here, we present noncovalent interaction energies in the CBS limit, free of BSSE, for 20 dimer systems of the S22 data set obtained via a highly parallelized MP2 implementation in the plane-wave pseudopotential molecular dynamics package CPMD. The specificities related to plane waves for accurate and efficient calculations of gas-phase energies are discussed, and results are compared to the localized (aug-)cc-pV[D,T,Q,5]Z correlation-consistent bases as well as their extrapolated CBS estimates. We find that the BSSE-corrected aug-cc-pV5Z basis can provide MP2 energies highly consistent with the CBS plane wave values with a minimum mean absolute deviation of ∼0.05 kcal/mol without the application of any extrapolation scheme. In addition, we tested the performance of 13 different extrapolation schemes and found that the X-3 expression applied to the (aug-)cc-pVXZ bases provides the smallest deviations against CBS plane wave values if the extrapolation sequence is composed of points D and T, while (X+12)-4 performs slightly better for TQ and Q5 extrapolations. Also, we propose A(X-12)-3+B(X+12)-4 as a reliable alternative to extrapolate total energies from the DTQ, TQ5, or DTQ5 data points. In spite of the general good agreement between the values obtained from the two types of basis sets, it is noticed that differences between plane waves and (aug-)cc-pVXZ basis sets, extrapolated or not, tend to increase with the number of electrons, thus raising the question of whether these discrepancies could indeed limit the attainable accuracy for localized bases in the limit of large systems.

Dataset Information

Canonical and DLPNO-Based Composite Wavefunction Methods Parametrized against Large and Chemically Diverse Training Sets. 2: Correlation-Consistent Basis Sets, Core-Valence Correlation, and F12 Alternatives.

Publications

Canonical and DLPNO-Based Composite Wavefunction Methods Parametrized against Large and Chemically Diverse Training Sets. 2: Correlation-Consistent Basis Sets, Core-Valence Correlation, and F12 Alternatives.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets