Dataset Information

Managing Malperfusion Syndrome in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection With Previous Cardiac Surgery.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Patients with acute type A aortic dissection with a previous cardiac surgery (PCS) and malperfusion syndrome (MPS) are extremely difficult to manage and have poor outcomes.

Methods

From 1996 to 2018, 668 patients underwent emergent open aortic repair or endovascular fenestration/stenting for MPS for an acute type A aortic dissection, including those with PCS (PCS, n = 64) and those without PCS (No-PCS, n = 604). The groups were further divided into PCS+MPS, PCS+No-MPS, No-PCS+MPS, and No-PCS+No-MPS.

Results

Compared with the No-PCS group, the PCS group had significantly more coronary artery disease, acute renal failure, and mesenteric and renal MPS. Forty-two percent of patients with PCS underwent upfront endovascular fenestration/stenting for endovascular-amendable MPS. The in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with PCS+MPS (40%) compared with PCS+No-MPS (5.9%), No-PCS+MPS (30%), and No-PCS+No-MPS (6.7%). Multivariable logistic regression showed cardiogenic shock (odds ratio, 7.3) and MPS (odds ratio, 6.6) were risk factors for in-hospital mortality (P < .001). After recovering from MPS the PCS group (n = 54) had similar rates of postoperative complications, including 30-day mortality (7.4% vs 6.3%, P = .77), compared with the No-PCS group (n = 557). The 5-year survival was significantly lower in the PCS group compared with the No-PCS group (60% vs 72%, P = .004) and was lowest in those with PCS+MPS (46%). PCS was not a significant risk factor for in-hospital (odds ratio, 1.2; P = .63) or late (hazard ratio, 1.3; P = .27) mortality.

Conclusions

Because of severe preoperative comorbidities and the complexity of open aortic repair, in acute type A aortic dissection patients with PCS and MPS, endovascular fenestration and stenting first with delayed redo sternotomy and central aortic repair was a valid approach.

SUBMITTER: Norton EL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7736272 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To assess outcomes of endovascular reperfusion followed by delayed open aortic repair for stable patients with acute type A aortic dissection and mesenteric malperfusion syndrome (mesMPS). METHODS:Among 602 patients with acute type A aortic dissection who presented to our center from 1996 to 2017, all 82 (14%) with mesMPS underwent upfront endovascular fenestration/stenting. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and long-term survival. Patients with acute type A aortic dissection with no malperfusion syndrome of any organ (n = 419) served as controls. RESULTS:In-hospital mortality of all comers with mesMPS was 39%. After endovascular fenestration/stenting, 20 mesMPS patients (24%) died from organ failure and 11 patients (13%) died from aortic rupture before open aortic repair, 47 patients (58%) underwent aortic repair, and 4 patients (5%) survived without open repair. No patients died from aortic rupture during the second decade (2008-2017). The significant risk factors for death from organ failure after endovascular reperfusion were acute stroke (odds ratio, 23; 95% confidence interval, 4-144; P = .0008), gross bowel necrosis at laparotomy (odds ratio, 7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-34; P = .016), and serum lactate ≥6 mmol/L (odds ratio, 13.5; 95% confidence interval, 2-97; P = .0097). There was no significant difference in operative mortality (2.1% vs 7.5%; P = .50) or long-term survival between patients with mesMPS who underwent open aortic repair after recovering from mesMPS and patients with no malperfusion syndrome. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with acute type A aortic dissection with mesMPS, endovascular fenestration/stenting, and delayed open aortic repair achieved favorable short- and long-term outcomes. Surgeons should consider correcting mesenteric malperfusion before undertaking open aortic repair in patients with mesMPS, especially those with acute stroke, gross bowel necrosis at laparotomy, or serum lactate ≥6 mmol/L.

Project description:ObjectiveThe study objective was to determine the optimal treatment for patients with acute type A aortic dissection and previous cardiac surgery.MethodsA total of 545 patients underwent open repair of an acute type A aortic dissection (July 1996 to January 2017), including patients with (n = 50) and without previous cardiac surgery (n = 495). Data were collected through the University of Michigan Cardiac Surgery Data Warehouse, medical record review, and the National Death Index database.ResultsCompared with patients without previous cardiac surgery, patients with previous cardiac surgery were older (62 vs 59 years, P = .24) and had significantly more coronary artery disease (48% vs 14%, P < .001), peripheral arterial disease (24% vs 11%, P = .01), connective tissue disorders (15% vs 4.5%, P = .004), and acute renal failure on presentation (28% vs 15%, P = .02); and significantly more concomitant mitral or tricuspid procedures, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and more intraoperative blood transfusions. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative major complications between previous cardiac surgery and no previous cardiac surgery groups, including stroke, myocardial infarction, new-onset dialysis, and 30-day mortality (8.9% vs 6.3%, P = .55). Multivariable logistic model showed the significant risk factors for operative mortality were cardiogenic shock (odds ratio, 9.6; P < .0001) and male gender (odds ratio, 3.7; P = .006). The 5- and 10-year unadjusted survivals were significantly lower in the previous cardiac surgery group compared with the no previous cardiac surgery group (66% vs 80% and 42% vs 66%, respectively, P = .02). However, previous cardiac surgery itself was not a significant risk factor for operative mortality (odds ratio, 1.6; P = .36) or all-time mortality (hazard ratio, 1.3; P = .33).ConclusionsAcute type A aortic dissection in patients with previous cardiac surgery can be repaired with favorable operative mortality and long-term survival, and should be treated surgically.

Project description:ObjectiveThe study objective was to evaluate the management of malperfusion in acute type B aortic dissection with endovascular fenestration/stenting.MethodsFrom 1996 to 2018, 182 patients with an acute type B aortic dissection underwent fenestration/stenting for suspected malperfusion based on imaging, clinical manifestations, and laboratory findings. Data were obtained from medical record review and the National Death Index database.ResultsThe median age of patients was 55 years. Signs of malperfusion included abdominal pain (61%), lower-extremity weakness (27%), nonpalpable lower-extremity pulses (24%), and abnormal lactate, creatinine, liver enzymes, and creatine kinase levels. Confirmed hemodynamically significant malperfusion affected the spinal cord (2.7%), celiac (24%), superior mesenteric (40%), renal (51%), and iliofemoral (43%) arterial distributions. Of the 182 patients, 99 (54%) underwent aortic fenestration/stenting, 108 (59%) had 1 or multi-branch vessel fenestration/stenting, 5 (2.7%) had concomitant thoracic endovascular aortic repair, 17 (9.3%) had additional thrombolysis or thromboembolectomy, and 48 (26%) received no intervention. After fenestration/stenting, 24 patients (13%) required additional procedures for necrotic bowel or limb and 9 patients (4.9%) had subsequent aortic repair (thoracic endovascular aortic repair, open repair) before discharge. The new-onset paraplegia was 0%. The in-hospital mortality was 7.7% over 20+ years and 0% in the last 8 years. The 5- and 10-year survivals were 72% and 49%, respectively. The significant risk factors for late mortality were age and acute paralysis (hazard ratio, 3.5; both P < .0001). Given death as a competing factor, the 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence of reintervention was 21% and 31% for distal aortic pathology, respectively.ConclusionsPatients with acute type B aortic dissection with malperfusion can be managed with endovascular fenestration/stenting with excellent short- and long-term outcomes. This approach is particularly helpful to patients with static malperfusion of aortic branch vessels.

Project description:AimsOperability of type A acute aortic dissections (TAAAD) is currently based on non-standardized decision-making process, and it lacks a disease-specific risk evaluation model that can predict mortality. We investigated patient, intraoperative data, surgeon, and centre-related variables for patients who underwent TAAAD in the UK.Methods and resultsWe identified 4203 patients undergoing TAAAD surgery in the UK (2009-18), who were enrolled into the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgical Audit dataset. The primary outcome was operative mortality. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed with fast backward elimination of variables and the bootstrap-based optimism-correction was adopted to assess model performance. Variation related to hospital or surgeon effects were quantified by a generalized mixed linear model and risk-adjusted funnel plots by displaying the individual standardized mortality ratio against expected deaths. Final variables retained in the model were: age [odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.03; P < 0.001]; malperfusion (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.51-2.12; P < 0.001); left ventricular ejection fraction (moderate: OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.14-1.71; P = 0.001; poor: OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.90-4.21; P < 0.001); previous cardiac surgery (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.71-3.07; P < 0.001); preoperative mechanical ventilation (OR 2.76, 95% CI 2.00-3.80; P < 0.001); preoperative resuscitation (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.14-9.87; P = 0.028); and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.86-2.83; P < 0.001). We found a significant inverse relationship between surgeons but not centre annual volume with outcomes.ConclusionsPatient characteristics, intraoperative factors, cardiac centre, and high-volume surgeons are strong determinants of outcomes following TAAAD surgery. These findings may help refining clinical decision-making, supporting patient counselling and be used by policy makers for quality assurance and service provision improvement.