Dataset Information

Atlas-independent, N-of-1 tissue activation modeling to map optimal regions of subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease

ABSTRACT: Highlights • Neuroanatomical variations among patients are obscured in atlas-based VTA modeling.• N-of-1 neuroanatomical and VTA modeling enables patient-level precision.• Mean optimal stimulation is dorsomedial to the STN, near its posterior half.• Individual VTAs deviate from optimal stimulation sites to varying degrees.• Optimal stimulation sites for rigidity, bradykinesia, and tremor partially overlap.

Background

Motor outcomes after subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) for Parkinson disease (PD) vary considerably among patients and strongly depend on stimulation location. The objective of this retrospective study was to map the regions of optimal STN DBS for PD using an atlas-independent, fully individualized (N-of-1) tissue activation modeling approach and to assess the relationship between patient-level therapeutic volumes of tissue activation (VTAs) and motor improvement.

Methods

The stimulation-induced electric field for 40 PD patients treated with bilateral STN DBS was modeled using finite element analysis. Neurostimulation models were generated for each patient, incorporating their individual STN anatomy, DBS lead position and orientation, anisotropic tissue conductivity, and clinical stimulation settings. A voxel-based analysis of the VTAs was then used to map the optimal location of stimulation. The amount of stimulation in specific regions relative to the STN was measured and compared between STNs with more and less optimal stimulation, as determined by their motor improvement scores and VTA. The relationship between VTA location and motor outcome was then assessed using correlation analysis. Patient variability in terms of STN anatomy, active contact position, and VTA location were also evaluated. Results from the N-of-1 model were compared to those from a simplified VTA model.

Results

Tissue activation modeling mapped the optimal location of stimulation to regions medial, posterior, and dorsal to the STN centroid. These regions extended beyond the STN boundary towards the caudal zona incerta (cZI). The location of the VTA and active contact position differed significantly between STNs with more and less optimal stimulation in the dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior directions. Therapeutic stimulation spread noticeably more in the dorsal and posterior directions, providing additional evidence for cZI as an important DBS target. There were significant linear relationships between the amount of dorsal and posterior stimulation, as measured by the VTA, and motor improvement. These relationships were more robust than those between active contact position and motor improvement. There was high variability in STN anatomy, active contact position, and VTA location among patients. Spherical VTA modeling was unable to reproduce these results and tended to overestimate the size of the VTA.

Conclusion

Accurate characterization of the spread of stimulation is needed to optimize STN DBS for PD. High variability in neuroanatomy, stimulation location, and motor improvement among patients highlights the need for individualized modeling techniques. The atlas-independent, N-of-1 tissue activation modeling approach presented in this study can be used to develop and evaluate stimulation strategies to improve clinical outcomes on an individual basis.

SUBMITTER: Malaga K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7736726 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for improving the motor symptoms of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Accurate positioning of the stimulation electrodes is necessary for better clinical outcomes.ObjectiveWe applied deep learning techniques to microelectrode recording (MER) signals to better predict motor function improvement, represented by the UPDRS part III scores, after bilateral STN DBS in patients with advanced PD. If we find the optimal stimulation point with MER by deep learning, we can improve the clinical outcome of STN DBS even under restrictions such as general anesthesia or non-cooperation of the patients.MethodsIn total, 696 4-second left-side MER segments from 34 patients with advanced PD who underwent bilateral STN DBS surgery under general anesthesia were included. We transformed the original signal into three wavelets of 1-50 Hz, 50-500 Hz, and 500-5,000 Hz. The wavelet-transformed MER was used for input data of the deep learning. The patients were divided into two groups, good response and moderate response groups, according to DBS on to off ratio of UPDRS part III score for the off-medication state, 6 months postoperatively. The ratio were used for output data in deep learning. The Visual Geometry Group (VGG)-16 model with a multitask learning algorithm was used to estimate the bilateral effect of DBS. Different ratios of the loss function in the task-specific layer were applied considering that DBS affects both sides differently.ResultsWhen we divided the MER signals according to the frequency, the maximal accuracy was higher in the 50-500 Hz group than in the 1-50 Hz and 500-5,000 Hz groups. In addition, when the multitask learning method was applied, the stability of the model was improved in comparison with single task learning. The maximal accuracy (80.21%) occurred when the right-to-left loss ratio was 5:1 or 6:1. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.88 in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.ConclusionClinical improvements in PD patients who underwent bilateral STN DBS could be predicted based on a multitask deep learning-based MER analysis.

Project description:Motor learning is defined as an improvement in performance through practice. The ability to learn new motor skills may be particularly challenged in patients with Parkinson's disease, in whom motor execution is impaired by the disease-defining motor symptoms such as bradykinesia. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation is an effective treatment in advanced Parkinson's disease, and its beneficial effects on Parkinsonian motor symptoms and motor execution have been widely demonstrated. Much less is known about whether deep brain stimulation directly interacts with motor learning independent of modulation of motor execution. We investigated motor sequence learning in 19 patients with Parkinson's disease treated with subthalamic deep brain stimulation and 19 age-matched controls. In a cross-over design, patients performed an initial motor sequence training session with active and inactive stimulation, respectively (experiments separated by ≥14 days). Performance was retested after 5 min and after a 6 h consolidation interval with active stimulation. Healthy controls performed a similar experiment once. We further investigated neural correlates underlying stimulation-related effects on motor learning by exploring the association of normative subthalamic deep brain stimulation functional connectivity profiles with stimulation-related differences in performance gains during training. Pausing deep brain stimulation during initial training resulted in the inhibition of performance gains that could have been indicative of learning at the behavioural level. Task performance improved significantly during training with active deep brain stimulation, but did not reach the level of learning dynamics of healthy controls. Importantly, task performance after the 6 h consolidation interval was similar across patients with Parkinson's disease independent of whether the initial training session had been performed with active or inactive deep brain stimulation. This indicates that early learning and subsequent consolidation were relatively intact despite severe impairments of motor execution during training with inactive deep brain stimulation. Normative connectivity analyses revealed plausible and significant connectivity of volumes of tissue activated by deep brain stimulation with several cortical areas. However, no specific connectivity profiles were associated with stimulation-dependent differences in learning during initial training. Our results show that motor learning in Parkinson's disease is independent of modulation of motor execution by subthalamic deep brain stimulation. This indicates an important role of the subthalamic nucleus in regulating general motor execution, whereas its role in motor learning appears negligible. Because longer-term outcomes were independent of performance gains during initial training, patients with Parkinson's disease may not need to wait for an optimal motor state to practice new motor skills.

Project description:Deep brain stimulation therapy is an effective symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease, yet the precise mechanisms responsible for its therapeutic effects remain unclear. Although the targets of deep brain stimulation are grey matter structures, axonal modulation is known to play an important role in deep brain stimulation's therapeutic mechanism. Several white matter structures in proximity to the subthalamic nucleus have been implicated in the clinical benefits of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. We assessed the connectivity patterns that characterize clinically beneficial electrodes in Parkinson's disease patients, after deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. We evaluated 22 patients with Parkinson's disease (11 females, age 57 ± 9.1 years, disease duration 13.3 ± 6.3 years) who received bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus at the National Institutes of Health. During an initial electrode screening session, one month after deep brain stimulation implantation, the clinical benefits of each contact were determined. The electrode was localized by coregistering preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative computer tomography images and the volume of tissue activated was estimated from stimulation voltage and impedance. Brain connectivity for the volume of tissue activated of deep brain stimulation contacts was assessed using probabilistic tractography with diffusion-tensor data. Areas most frequently connected to clinically effective contacts included the thalamus, substantia nigra, brainstem and superior frontal gyrus. A series of discriminant analyses demonstrated that the strength of connectivity to the superior frontal gyrus and the thalamus were positively associated with clinical effectiveness. The connectivity patterns observed in our study suggest that the modulation of white matter tracts directed to the superior frontal gyrus and the thalamus is associated with favourable clinical outcomes and may contribute to the therapeutic effects of deep brain stimulation. Our method can be further developed to reliably identify effective deep brain stimulation contacts and aid in the programming process.