Dataset Information

Pilot cluster randomised trial of an evidence-based intervention to reduce avoidable hospital admissions in nursing home residents (Better Health in Residents of Care Homes with Nursing-BHiRCH-NH Study).

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To pilot a complex intervention to support healthcare and improve early detection and treatment for common health conditions experienced by nursing home (NH) residents.

Design

Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.

Setting

14 NHs (7 intervention, 7 control) in London and West Yorkshire.

Participants

NH residents, their family carers and staff.

Intervention

Complex intervention to support healthcare and improve early detection and treatment of urinary tract and respiratory infections, chronic heart failure and dehydration, comprising: (1) 'Stop and Watch (S&W)' early warning tool for changes in physical health, (2) condition-specific care pathway and (3) Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation tool to enhance communication with primary care. Implementation was supported by Practice Development Champions, a Practice Development Support Group and regular telephone coaching with external facilitators.

Outcome measures

Data on NH (quality ratings, size, ownership), residents, family carers and staff demographics during the month prior to intervention and subsequently, numbers of admissions, accident and emergency visits, and unscheduled general practitioner visits monthly for 6 months during intervention. We collected data on how the intervention was used, healthcare resource use and quality of life data for economic evaluation. We assessed recruitment and retention, and whether a full trial was warranted.

Results

We recruited 14 NHs, 148 staff, 95 family carers and 245 residents. We retained the majority of participants recruited (95%). 15% of residents had an unplanned hospital admission for one of the four study conditions. We were able to collect sufficient questionnaire data (all over 96% complete). No NH implemented intervention tools as planned. Only 16 S&W forms and 8 care pathways were completed. There was no evidence of harm.

Conclusions

Recruitment, retention and data collection processes were effective but the intervention not implemented. A full trial is not warranted.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN74109734 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN74109734). ORIGINAL PROTOCOL: BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e026510. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026510.

SUBMITTER: Sampson EL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7737107 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pilot cluster randomised trial of an evidence-based intervention to reduce avoidable hospital admissions in nursing home residents (Better Health in Residents of Care Homes with Nursing-BHiRCH-NH Study).

Sampson Elizabeth L EL Feast Alexandra A Blighe Alan A Froggatt Katherine K Hunter Rachael R Marston Louise L McCormack Brendan B Nurock Shirley S Panca Monica M Powell Catherine C Rait Greta G Robinson Louise L Woodward-Carlton Barbara B Young John J Downs Murna M

BMJ open 20201213 12

<h4>Objectives</h4>To pilot a complex intervention to support healthcare and improve early detection and treatment for common health conditions experienced by nursing home (NH) residents.<h4>Design</h4>Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.<h4>Setting</h4>14 NHs (7 intervention, 7 control) in London and West Yorkshire.<h4>Participants</h4>NH residents, their family carers and staff.<h4>Intervention</h4>Complex intervention to support healthcare and improve early detection and treatment of ur ...[more]

PMID: 33318118

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionAcute hospital admission is distressing for care home residents. Ambulatory care sensitive conditions, such as respiratory and urinary tract infections, are conditions that can cause unplanned hospital admission but may have been avoidable with timely detection and intervention in the community. The Better Health in Residents in Care Homes (BHiRCH) programme has feasibility tested and will pilot a multicomponent intervention to reduce these avoidable hospital admissions. The BHiRCH intervention comprises an early warning tool for noting changes in resident health, a care pathway (clinical guidance and decision support system) and a structured method for communicating with primary care, adapted for use in the care home. We use practice development champions to support implementation and embed changes in care.Methods and analysisCluster randomised pilot trial to test study procedures and indicate whether a further definitive trial is warranted. Fourteen care homes with nursing (nursing homes) will be randomly allocated to intervention (delivered at nursing home level) or control groups. Two nurses from each home become Practice Development Champions trained to implement the intervention, supported by a practice development support group. Data will be collected for 3 months preintervention, monthly during the 12-month intervention and 1 month after. Individual-level data includes resident, care partner and staff demographics, resident functional status, service use and quality of life (for health economic analysis) and the extent to which staff perceive the organisation supports person centred care. System-level data includes primary and secondary health services contacts (ie, general practitioner and hospital admissions). Process evaluation assesses intervention acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, ease of implementation in practice and study procedures (ie, consent and recruitment rates).Ethics and disseminationApproved by Research Ethics Committee and the UK Health Research Authority. Findings will be disseminated via academic and policy conferences, peer-reviewed publications and social media (eg, Twitter).Trial registration numberISRCTN74109734; Pre-results.

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine whether a systematic approach to the treatment of pain can reduce agitation in people with moderate to severe dementia living in nursing homes.DesignCluster randomised controlled trial.Setting60 clusters (single independent nursing home units) in 18 nursing homes within five municipalities of western Norway.Participants352 residents with moderate to severe dementia and clinically significant behavioural disturbances randomised to a stepwise protocol for the treatment of pain for eight weeks with additional follow-up four weeks after the end of treatment (33 clusters; n = 175) or to usual treatment (control, 27 clusters; n = 177).InterventionParticipants in the intervention group received individual daily treatment of pain for eight weeks according to the stepwise protocol, with paracetamol (acetaminophen), morphine, buprenorphine transdermal patch, or pregabaline. The control group received usual treatment and care.Main outcome measuresPrimary outcome measure was agitation (scores on Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory). Secondary outcome measures were aggression (scores on neuropsychiatric inventory-nursing home version), pain (scores on mobilisation-observation-behaviour-intensity-dementia-2), activities of daily living, and cognition (mini-mental state examination).ResultsAgitation was significantly reduced in the intervention group compared with control group after eight weeks (repeated measures analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline score, P < 0.001): the average reduction in scores for agitation was 17% (treatment effect estimate -7.0, 95% confidence interval -3.7 to -10.3). Treatment of pain was also significantly beneficial for the overall severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms (-9.0, -5.5 to -12.6) and pain (-1.3, -0.8 to -1.7), but the groups did not differ significantly for activities of daily living or cognition.ConclusionA systematic approach to the management of pain significantly reduced agitation in residents of nursing homes with moderate to severe dementia. Effective management of pain can play an important part in the treatment of agitation and could reduce the number of unnecessary prescriptions for psychotropic drugs in this population. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01021696 and Norwegian Medicines Agency EudraCTnr 2008-007490-20.

Project description:BackgroundWide variations in facility staffing may lead to differences in care, and consequently, adverse outcomes such as hospitalizations. However, few studies focused on types of occupations. Therefore, we aimed to examine the association between a wide variety of facility staffing and potentially avoidable hospitalizations of nursing home residents in Japan.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study using long-term care and medical insurance claims data in Ibaraki Prefecture from April 2018 to March 2019, we identified individuals aged 65 years and above who were newly admitted to nursing homes. In addition, facility characteristic data were obtained from the long-term care insurance service disclosure system. Subsequently, we conducted a multivariable Cox regression analysis and evaluated the association between facility staffing and potentially avoidable hospitalizations.ResultsA total of 2909 residents from 235 nursing homes were included. The cumulative incidence of potentially avoidable hospitalizations at 180 days was 14.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.7-15.8). Facilities with full-time physicians (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37-0.94) and a higher number of dietitians (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.97) were significantly associated with a lower likelihood of potentially avoidable hospitalizations. In contrast, having nurses or trained caregivers during the night shift (HR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.25-2.36) and a higher number of care managers (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.03-1.83) were significantly associated with a high probability of potentially avoidable hospitalizations.ConclusionsWe revealed that variations in facility staffing were associated with potentially avoidable hospitalizations. The results suggest that optimal allocation of human resources, such as dietitians and physicians, may be essential to reduce potentially avoidable hospitalizations. To provide appropriate care to nursing home residents, it is necessary to establish a system to effectively allocate limited resources. Further research is warranted on the causal relationship between staff allocation and unnecessary hospitalizations, considering the confounding factors.

Project description:BACKGROUND: The geriatric nursing home population is vulnerable to acute and deteriorating illness due to advanced age, multiple chronic illnesses and high levels of dependency. Although the detriments of hospitalising the frail and old are widely recognised, hospital admissions from nursing homes remain common. Little is known about what alternatives exist to prevent and reduce hospital admissions from this setting. The objective of this study, therefore, is to summarise the effects of interventions to reduce acute hospitalisations from nursing homes. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science in April 2013. Studies were eligible if they had a geriatric nursing home study population and were evaluating any type of intervention aiming at reducing acute hospital admission. Systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, quasi randomised controlled trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series were eligible study designs. The process of selecting studies, assessing them, extracting data and grading the total evidence was done by two researchers individually, with any disagreement solved by a third. We made use of meta-analyses from included systematic reviews, the remaining synthesis is descriptive. Based on the type of intervention, the included studies were categorised in: 1) Interventions to structure and standardise clinical practice, 2) Geriatric specialist services and 3) Influenza vaccination. RESULTS: Five systematic reviews and five primary studies were included, evaluating a total of 11 different interventions. Fewer hospital admissions were found in four out of seven evaluations of structuring and standardising clinical practice; in both evaluations of geriatric specialist services, and in influenza vaccination of residents. The quality of the evidence for all comparisons was of low or very low quality, using the GRADE approach. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, eleven interventions to reduce hospital admissions from nursing homes were identified. None of them were tested more than once and the quality of the evidence was low for every comparison. Still, several interventions had effects on reducing hospital admissions and may represent important aspects of nursing home care to reduce hospital admissions.

Dataset Information

Pilot cluster randomised trial of an evidence-based intervention to reduce avoidable hospital admissions in nursing home residents (Better Health in Residents of Care Homes with Nursing-BHiRCH-NH Study).

Objectives

Design

Setting

Participants

Intervention

Outcome measures

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration number

Publications

Pilot cluster randomised trial of an evidence-based intervention to reduce avoidable hospital admissions in nursing home residents (Better Health in Residents of Care Homes with Nursing-BHiRCH-NH Study).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets