Dataset Information

Screening and identification of key genes between liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL) by bioinformatic analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL) are common primary liver cancers worldwide. Liver stem cells have biopotential to differentiate into either hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, the phenotypic overlap between LIHC and CHOL has been acceptable as a continuous liver cancer spectrum. However, few studies directly investigated the underlying molecular mechanisms between LIHC and CHOL.

Method

To identify the candidate genes between LIHC and CHOL, three data series including GSE31370, GSE15765 and GSE40367 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and function enrichment analyses were performed. The protein-protein interaction network (PPI) was constructed and the module analysis was performed using STRING and Cytoscape.

Results

A total of 171 DEGs were identified, consisting of 49 downregulated genes and 122 upregulated genes. Compared with CHOL, the enriched functions of the DEGs mainly included steroid metabolic process, acute inflammatory response, coagulation. Meanwhile, the pathway of KEGG enrichment analyses showed that the upregulated gene(s) were mainly enriched complement and coagulation cascades, cholesterol metabolism and PPAR signaling pathway, while the downregulated gene(s) were mainly enriched in ECM-receptor interaction, focal adhesion, bile secretion. Similarly, the most significant module was identified and biological process analysis revealed that these genes were mainly enriched in regulation of blood coagulation, acute inflammatory response, complement and coagulation cascades. Finally, two (ITIH2 and APOA2) of 10 hub genes had been screened out to help differential diagnosis.

Conclusion

171 DEGs and two (ITIH2 and APOA2) of 10 hub genes identified in the present study help us understand the different molecular mechanisms between LIHC and CHOL, and provide candidate targets for differential diagnosis.

SUBMITTER: Kang X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7738106 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Screening and identification of key genes between liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL) by bioinformatic analysis.

Kang Xindan X Bai Li L Qi Xiaoguang X Wang Jing J

Medicine 20201201 50

<h4>Background</h4>Liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL) are common primary liver cancers worldwide. Liver stem cells have biopotential to differentiate into either hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, the phenotypic overlap between LIHC and CHOL has been acceptable as a continuous liver cancer spectrum. However, few studies directly investigated the underlying molecular mechanisms between LIHC and CHOL.<h4>Method</h4>To identify the candidate genes between LIHC and CHOL ...[more]

PMID: 33327311

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Alcohol-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was reported to be diagnosed at a later stage, but the mechanism was unknown. This study aimed to identify special key genes (SKGs) during alcohol-related HCC development and progression. Methods:The mRNA data of 369 HCC patients and the clinical information were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas project (TCGA). The 310 patients with certain HCC-related risk factors were included for analysis and divided into seven groups according to the risk factors. Survival analyses were applied for the HCC patients of different groups. The patients with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infection only were combined into the HCC-V group for further analysis. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the HCCs with alcohol consumption only (HCC-A) and HCC-V tumors were identified through limma package in R with cutoff criteria?log2 fold change (logFC)|>1.0 and p < 0.05. The DEGs between eight alcohol-related HCCs and their paired normal livers of GSE59259 from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were identified through GEO2R (a built-in tool in GEO database) with cutoff criteria |logFC|> 2.0 and adj.p < 0.05. The intersection of the two sets of DEGs was considered SKGs which were then investigated for their specificity through comparisons between HCC-A and other four HCC groups. The SKGs were analyzed for their correlations with HCC-A stage and grade and their prognostic power for HCC-A patients. The expressional differences of the SKGs in the HCCs in whole were also investigated through Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA). The SKGs in HCC were validated through Oncomine database analysis. Results:Pathological stage is an independent prognostic factor for HCC patients. HCC-A patients were diagnosed later than HCC patients with other risk factors. Ten SKGs were identified and nine of them were confirmed for their differences in paired samples of HCC-A patients. Three (SLC22A10, CD5L, and UROC1) and four (SLC22A10, UROC1, CSAG3, and CSMD1) confirmed genes were correlated with HCC-A stage and grade, respectively. SPP2 had a lower trend in HCC-A tumors and was negatively correlated with HCC-A stage and grade. The SKGs each was differentially expressed between HCC-A and at least one of other HCC groups. CD5L was identified to be favorable prognostic factor for overall survival while CSMD1 unfavorable prognostic factor for disease-free survival for HCC-A patients and HCC patients in whole. Through Oncomine database, the dysregulations of the SKGs in HCC and their clinical significance were confirmed. Conclusion:The poor prognosis of HCC-A patients might be due to their later diagnosis. The SKGs, especially the four stage-correlated genes (CD5L, SLC22A10, UROC1, and SPP2) might play important roles in HCC development, especially alcohol-related HCC development and progression. CD5L might be useful for overall survival and CSMD1 for disease-free survival predication in HCC, especially alcohol-related HCC.

Project description:BackgroundPapillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is the most common type of renal cell carcinoma after clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Its pathological classification is controversial, and its molecular mechanism is poorly understood. Therefore, the identification of key genes and their biological pathways is of great significance to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of PRCC occurrence and progression.MethodsThe PRCC-related datasets GSE7023, GSE48352 and GSE15641 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were performed. Cytoscape and STRING were used to construct the protein-protein interaction network (PPI) and perform module analysis to identify hub genes and key pathways. A heatmap of hub genes was constructed using the UCSC cancer genomics browser. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients stratified by the expression levels of hub genes were analysed using Kaplan-Meier Plotter. The online database UALCAN was applied to analyse gene expression based on tissue type, stage, subtype and race.ResultsA total of 214 DEGs, specifically, 205 downregulated genes and 9 upregulated genes, were identified. The DEGs were mainly enriched in angiogenesis, kidney development, oxidation-reduction process, metabolic pathways, etc. The 17 hub genes identified were mainly enriched in the biological processes of angiogenesis, cell adhesion, platelet degranulation, and leukocyte transendothelial migration. Survival analysis showed that EGF, KDR, CXCL12, REN, PECAM1, CDH5, THY1, WT1, PLAU and DCN might be related to the carcinogenesis, metastasis or recurrence of PRCC. UALCAN analysis showed that low expression of PECAM1 and PLAU in PRCC tissues was related to stage, subtype and race.ConclusionsThe DEGs and hub genes identified in the present study provide insight into the specific molecular mechanisms of PRCC occurrence and development and may be potential molecular markers and therapeutic targets for the accurate classification and efficient diagnosis and treatment of PRCC.

Dataset Information

Screening and identification of key genes between liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL) by bioinformatic analysis.

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Screening and identification of key genes between liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL) by bioinformatic analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets