Dataset Information

Video-based, student tutor- versus faculty staff-led ultrasound course for medical students - a prospective randomized study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Ultrasound education is propagated already during medical school due to its diagnostic importance. Courses are usually supervised by experienced faculty staff (FS) with patient bedside examinations or students among each other but often overbooked due to limited FS availability. To overcome this barrier, use of teaching videos may be advantageous. Likewise, peer teaching concepts solely with trained student tutors have shown to be feasible and effective. The aim was to evaluate 1) objective learning outcomes of a combined video-based, student-tutor (ViST) as compared to a FS-led course without media support, 2) acceptance and subjective learning success of the videos.

Methods

Two ultrasound teaching videos for basic and advanced abdominal ultrasound (AU) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were produced and six students trained as tutors. Fourth-year medical students (N = 96) were randomized to either the ViST- or FS course (6 students per tutor). Learning objectives were defined equally for both courses. Acquired practical basic and advanced ultrasound skills were tested in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) using modified validated scoring sheets with a maximum total score of 40 points. Acceptance and subjective learning success of both videos were evaluated by questionnaires based on Kirkpatrick's evaluation model with scale-rated closed and open questions.

Results

79 of 96 medical students completed the OSCE and 77 could be finally analyzed. There was no significant difference in the mean total point score of 31.3 in the ViST (N = 42) and 32.7 in the FS course (N = 35, P = 0.31) or in any of the examined basic or advanced ultrasound skill subtasks. Of the 42 ViST participants, 29 completed the AU and 27 the TTE video questionnaire. Acceptance and subjective learning success of both videos was rated positively in 14-52% and 48-88% of the rated responses to each category, respectively. Attendance of either the student or faculty tutor was deemed necessary in addition to the videos.

Conclusions

A ViST versus FS teaching concept was able to effectively teach undergraduate students in AU and TTE, albeit acceptance of the teaching videos alone was limited. However, the ViST concept has the potential to increase course availability and FS resource allocation.

SUBMITTER: Eimer C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7741871 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundA one-month long foundation course has been introduced at the entry-level for first-year MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) students in the medical institutions across India from 2019. Therefore, the present study is aimed at describing the experience of implementing a one-month long foundation course conducted for the Competency-based Undergraduate Medical Curriculum (CBUC) of Indian Medical Graduate as per the guidelines from the National Medical Commission (NMC) (erstwhile Medical Council of India, MCI). We have evaluated the student and faculty perceptions towards the effectiveness of the program.MethodsThe foundation course had six modules Orientation, Skills, Field visit to Community Health Centre, Professional Development including Ethics, Sports and Extracurricular activities, Computer Skills, and Language enhancement program. Regular feedback wascollected from students (N = 250) and teachers (N = 26) involved in the Foundation course using a semi-structured questionnaire. The program's overall feedback was also obtained at the end of the course, using a validated questionnaire. The quantitative findings were expressed in frequency and percentage. The qualitative observations (reflections of students and faculty) were subjected to thematic.ResultsThe students and faculty appreciated the one-month long foundation course. The course's defined objectives were met as indicated by most students (98.4%) and faculty (75%). The course seemed to be useful for students to embark on a formal MBBS curriculum. It also exposed them to new knowledge and practices, as indicated by the feedback. Thematic analysis of the students' and faculty's reflections was carried out and two themes were identified, i.e., 'strengths' and 'challenges.' The Foundation Course Committee will work out appropriate remedial measures to overcome the challenges in the future sessions for subsequent batches.ConclusionsThe one-month-long foundation course was found to be beneficial for newly joined students to get introduced and adjusted to higher education systems' demands. Also, the challenges faced during the program needs to be addressed with suitable remedial measures while implementing for subsequent batches. This effort will ensure a smooth conduct of the foundation course for the future batches of medical undergraduates and make the program more effective.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough surgical suturing is one of the most important basic skills, many medical school graduates do not acquire sufficient knowledge of it due to its lack of integration into the curriculum or a shortage of tutors. E-learning approaches attempt to address this issue but still rely on the involvement of tutors. Furthermore, the learning experience and visual-spatial ability appear to play a critical role in surgical skill acquisition. Virtual reality head-mounted displays (HMDs) could address this, but the benefits of immersive and stereoscopic learning of surgical suturing techniques are still unclear.Material and methodsIn this multi-arm randomized controlled trial, 150 novices participated. Three teaching modalities were compared: an e-learning course (monoscopic), an HMD-based course (stereoscopic, immersive), both self-directed and a tutor-led course with feedback. Suturing performance was recorded by video camera both before and after course participation (>26 h of video material) and assessed in a blinded fashion using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) Global Rating Score (GRS). Furthermore, the optical flow of the videos was determined using an algorithm. The number of sutures performed was counted, the visual-spatial ability was measured with the Mental Rotation Test (MRT), and courses were assessed with questionnaires.ResultsStudents' self-assessment in the HMD-based course was comparable to that of the tutor-led course and significantly better than in the e-learning course ( P =0.003). Course suitability was rated best for the tutor-led course ( x̄ =4.8), followed by the HMD-based ( x̄ =3.6) and e-learning ( x̄ =2.5) courses. The median ΔGRS between courses was comparable ( P =0.15) at 12.4 (95% CI 10.0-12.7) for the e-learning course, 14.1 (95% CI 13.0-15.0) for the HMD-based course, and 12.7 (95% CI 10.3-14.2) for the tutor-led course. However, the ΔGRS was significantly correlated with the number of sutures performed during the training session ( P =0.002), but not with visual-spatial ability ( P =0.615). Optical flow ( R2 =0.15, P <0.001) and the number of sutures performed ( R2 =0.73, P <0.001) can be used as additional measures to GRS.ConclusionThe use of HMDs with stereoscopic and immersive video provides advantages in the learning experience and should be preferred over a traditional web application for e-learning. Contrary to expectations, feedback is not necessary for novices to achieve a sufficient level in suturing; only the number of surgical sutures performed during training is a good determinant of competence improvement. Nevertheless, feedback still enhances the learning experience. Therefore, automated assessment as an alternative feedback approach could further improve self-directed learning modalities. As a next step, the data from this study could be used to develop such automated AI-based assessments.