Dataset Information

Phase II clinical trial using camrelizumab combined with apatinib and chemotherapy as the first?line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

ABSTRACT: Abstract

Background

Effective therapeutic options are limited for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The incorporation of an immune checkpoint inhibitor and a molecular anti?angiogenic agent into the commonly adopted chemotherapy may produce synergistic effects. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib combined with chemotherapy as the first?line treatment of advanced ESCC.

Methods

In this single?arm prospective phase II trial, patients with unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic ESCC received camrelizumab 200 mg, liposomal paclitaxel 150 mg/m2, and nedaplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, and apatinib 250 mg on days 1?14. The treatments were repeated every 14 days for up to 9 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with camrelizumab and apatinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression?free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

We enrolled 30 patients between August 7, 2018 and February 23, 2019. The median follow?up was 24.98 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.05?26.16 months). The centrally assessed ORR was 80.0% (95% CI: 61.4%?92.3%), with a median duration of response of 9.77 months (range: 1.54 to 24.82+ months). The DCR reached 96.7% (95% CI: 82.8%?99.9%). The median PFS was 6.85 months (95% CI: 4.46?14.20 months), and the median OS was 19.43 months (95% CI: 9.93 months – not reached). The most common grade 3?4 treatment?related adverse events (AEs) were leukopenia (83.3%), neutropenia (60.0%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase level (26.7%). Treatment?related serious AEs included febrile neutropenia, leukopenia, and anorexia in one patient (3.3%), and single cases of increased blood bilirubin level (3.3%) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (3.3%). No treatment?related deaths occurred.

Conclusions

Camrelizumab plus apatinib combined with liposomal paclitaxel and nedaplatin as first?line treatment demonstrated feasible anti?tumor activity and manageable safety in patients with advanced ESCC. Randomized trials to evaluate this new combination strategy are warranted.

Trial registration

This trial was registered on July 27, 2018, at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03603756).

SUBMITTER: Zhang B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7743020 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveResults of CameL-sq has revealed the clinical benefits to patients with advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC). This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy to treat sq-NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.MethodsWe used a partitioned survival model with a lifetime horizon to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy in treating sq-NSCLC. Baseline characteristics of patients and key clinical data were extracted from CameL-sq. Costs and utilities were collected from the open-access database and published literature. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were chosen as economic outcome indicators. We also performed a sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and scenario analysis to verify the stability of the basic analysis results and explore the results under different scenarios.ResultsCombination therapy added 0.47 QALYS and 0.91 life-years with an incremental cost of $6,347.81 compared with chemotherapy, which had an ICER of $13,572 per QALY. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that camrelizumab plus chemotherapy had a 37.8% probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) of 1 time GDP per capital. When WTP was set as 3 times GDP per capital, combination therapy had significant cost-effectiveness. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that cost of the best supportive care was the factor with the greatest influence. The subgroup analysis found that combination therapy was associated with cost-effectiveness in several subgroups, namely, patients with disease stage IIIB/IIIC and with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≤ 1%. Scenario analysis showed that ICER was positively correlated with the price of camrelizumab.ConclusionIn this economic evaluation, camrelizumab plus chemotherapy was unlikely to be cost-effective compared with chemotherapy in the first line therapy of sq-NSCLC from a perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Reducing the price of camrelizumab and tailoring treatments based on individual patient factors might improve the cost-effectiveness. Our findings may provide evidence for clinicians in making optimal decisions in general clinical practice.

Project description:BackgroundThe prognosis for esophageal cancer (EC), a common malignant tumor, is poor. The new oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor apatinib has shown an excellent therapeutic effect on treating EC. Camrelizumab is a humanized programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor with high affinity. Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced EC. The new combination strategy of anti-angiogenic therapy combined with immunotherapy has great application prospects in the treatment of tumors. We aimed to assess camrelizumab in combination with apatinib as a new combination regimen for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).MethodsIn this study, we recruited patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2, with pathologically confirmed unresectable, locally advanced, locally recurrent, or metastatic ESCC. Each patient received an intravenous infusion of camrelizumab 200 mg and oral administration of apatinib 250 mg once a day, every 21 days, as a cycle until disease progression, intolerance, or death. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), while the Kaplan-Meier method and LIFETEST procedure were used to estimate survival functions for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03, was used to evaluate adverse events.ResultsBetween December 1, 2019 and July 31, 2022, 35 patients were enrolled, with 29 patients in the efficacy and safety analysis. The ORR was 34.5%, and the disease control rate (DCR) reached 82.8%. Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI: 11.2-16.2), and the estimated 6-, 9-, and 12-month OS rates were 85.5% (95% CI: 65.7-94.3%), 80.9% (95% CI: 60.3-91.5%), and 67.0% (95% CI: 43.8-82.4%), respectively. Median PFS was 9.5 months (95% CI: 7.0-13.6). The most prominent grade ≥3 adverse events associated with treatments were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase (10.3%), hypertension (10.3%), and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (CCEP) (6.9%), and no deaths occurred due to adverse events.ConclusionsAmong patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, camrelizumab combined with apatinib showed a reasonable remission rate and survival benefit with a manageable safety profile.

Project description:BackgroundLimited data are available for the combination regimen of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and anti-angiogenic agents as second-line therapy for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially in patients with squamous NSCLC. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib (a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced squamous NSCLC.MethodsIn the Cohort 3 from a phase II dose-expansion trial, patients with advanced non-central squamous NSCLC who were immunotherapy naïve and had failed prior first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received 200 mg of camrelizumab intravenously every 2 weeks plus oral apatinib at the recommended dose of 250 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigators as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v 1.1.ResultsCohort 3 was prematurely terminated because of slow accrual after 25 patients with advanced squamous NSCLC had been enrolled between 10 October 2018, and 3 March 2019. At the data cutoff date of 12 June 2020, the median follow-up was 13.3 (range, 1.6 to 19.2) months. Among all 25 participants, the ORR was 32.0% (95% CI: 14.9% to 53.5%), the clinical benefit rate was 44.0% (95% CI: 24.4% to 65.1%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 84.0% (95% CI: 63.9% to 95.5%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.0 (95% CI: 3.5 to 8.1) months, and median overall survival (OS) was 13.3 (95% CI: 6.4 to 18.8) months. Furthermore, clinical benefits from this combination regimen were evident across all tumor PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression subgroups. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade 3 or higher were hypertension (44.0%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (16.0%). As reported by the investigators, 3 participants (12.0%) died due to TRAEs (interstitial pneumonia, hemorrhage, and unknown reason; n=1 each, 4%).ConclusionsCamrelizumab plus apatinib as second-line therapy showed satisfactory antitumor activity in patients with non-central squamous NSCLC, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. Camrelizumab plus apatinib had a manageable safety profile in this patient population, and the toxic reactions observed were generally consistent with those in previously reported studies. Interstitial pneumonia and hemorrhage are important risks requiring careful monitoring and prompt intervention.