Dataset Information

TNFR1 and the TNF? axis as a targetable mediator of liver injury from stereotactic body radiation therapy.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Radiation therapy for the management of intrahepatic malignancies can adversely affect liver function. Liver damage has been associated with increased levels of inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF?). We hypothesized that an inflammatory state, characterized by increased soluble TNF? receptor (sTNFR1), mediates sensitivity of the liver to radiation.

Materials/methods

Plasma samples collected during 3 trials of liver radiation for liver malignancies were assayed for sTNFR1 level via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and longitudinal models were used to characterize associations between liver toxicity (defined as a ?2-point increase in Child-Pugh [CP] score within 6 months of radiation treatment) and sTNFR1 levels, ALBI score, biocorrected mean liver dose (MLD), age, and baseline laboratory values.

Results

Samples from 78 patients given liver stereotactic body radiation therapy [SBRT] (92%) or hypofractionated radiation were examined. There was a significant association between liver toxicity and sTNFR1 levels, and higher values were associated with increased toxicity over a range of mean liver doses. When ALBI score and biocorrected dose were included in the model with sTNFR1, baseline ALBI score and change in ALBI (?ALBI) were significantly associated with toxicity, but sTNFR1 was not. Baseline aminotransferase levels also predicted toxicity but not independently of ALBI score.

Conclusions

Elevated plasma sTNFR1 levels are associated with liver injury after liver radiation, suggesting that elevated inflammatory cytokine activity is a predictor of radiation-induced liver dysfunction. Future studies should determine whether administration of agents that decrease inflammation prior to treatment is warranted.

SUBMITTER: Cousins MM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7744766 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

TNFR1 and the TNFα axis as a targetable mediator of liver injury from stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Cousins Matthew M MM Morris Emily E Maurino Christopher C Devasia Theresa P TP Karnak David D Ray Dipankar D Parikh Neehar D ND Owen Dawn D Ten Haken Randall K RK Schipper Matthew J MJ Lawrence Theodore S TS Cuneo Kyle C KC

Translational oncology 20201213 1

<h4>Introduction</h4>Radiation therapy for the management of intrahepatic malignancies can adversely affect liver function. Liver damage has been associated with increased levels of inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα). We hypothesized that an inflammatory state, characterized by increased soluble TNFα receptor (sTNFR1), mediates sensitivity of the liver to radiation.<h4>Materials/methods</h4>Plasma samples collected during 3 trials of liver radiation for liver ma ...[more]

PMID: 33395747

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo quantitatively evaluate published experiences with hepatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), to determine local control rates after treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors and to examine whether outcomes are affected by SBRT dosing regimen.Methods and materialsWe identified published articles that reported local control rates after SBRT for primary or metastatic liver tumors. Biologically effective doses (BEDs) were calculated for each dosing regimen using the linear-quadratic equation. We excluded series in which a wide range of BEDs was used. Individual lesion data for local control were extracted from actuarial survival curves, and data were aggregated to form a single dataset. Actuarial local control curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method after grouping lesions by disease type and BED (<100 Gy10 vs >100 Gy10). Comparisons were made using log-rank testing.ResultsThirteen articles met all inclusion criteria and formed the dataset for this analysis. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial local control rates after SBRT for primary liver tumors (n = 431) were 93%, 89%, and 86%, respectively. Lower 1- (90%), 2- (79%), and 3-year (76%) actuarial local control rates were observed for liver metastases (n = 290, log-rank P = .011). Among patients treated with SBRT for primary liver tumors, there was no evidence that local control is influenced by BED within the range of schedules used. For liver metastases, on the other hand, outcomes were significantly better for lesions treated with BEDs exceeding 100 Gy10 (3-year local control 93%) than for those treated with BEDs of ≤100 Gy10 (3-year local control 65%, P < .001).ConclusionsStereotactic body radiation therapy for primary liver tumors provides high rates of durable local control, with no clear evidence for a dose-response relationship among commonly utilized schedules. Excellent local control rates are also seen after SBRT for liver metastases when BEDs of >100 Gy10 are utilized.

Project description:We present our initial experience with CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in a heavily pretreated group of patients with liver metastases and primary liver tumors. From October 2007 to June 2009, 48 patients were treated at the Philadelphia CyberKnife Center for liver metastases or primary liver tumors. We report on 30 patients with 41 discrete lesions (1-4 tumors per patient) who received an ablative radiation dose (BED???79.2?Gy10?=?66?Gy EQD2). The treatment goal was to achieve a high SBRT dose to the liver tumor while sparing at least 700?cc of liver from radiation doses above 15?Gy. Twenty-three patients were treated with SBRT for metastatic cancer to the liver; the remainder (n?=?7) were primary liver tumors. Eighty-seven percent of patients had prior systemic chemotherapy with a median 24?months from diagnosis to SBRT; 37% had prior liver directed therapy. Local control was assessed for 28 patients (39 tumors) with 4?months or more follow-up. At a median follow-up of 22?months (range, 10-40?months), 14/39 (36%) tumors had documented local failure. A decrease in local failure was found with higher doses of SBRT (p?=?0.0237); 55% of tumors receiving a BED???100?Gy10 (10/18) had local failure compared with 19% receiving a BED?>?100?Gy10 (4/21). The 2-year actuarial rate of local control for tumors treated with BED?>?100?Gy10 was 75% compared to 38% for those patients treated with BED???100?Gy10 (p?=?0.04). At last follow-up, 22/30 patients (73%) had distant progression of disease. Overall, seven patients remain alive with a median survival of 20?months from treatment and 57?months from diagnosis. To date, no patient experienced persistent or severe adverse effects. Despite the heavy pretreatment of these patients, SBRT was well tolerated with excellent local control rates when adequate doses (BED?>?100?Gy10) were used. Median survival was limited secondary to development of further metastatic disease in the majority of patients.

Project description:Purpose:Daily magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiation has the potential to improve stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for tumors of the liver. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) introduces unique variables that are untested clinically: electron return effect, MRI geometric distortion, MRI to radiation therapy isocenter uncertainty, multileaf collimator position error, and uncertainties with voxel size and tracking. All could lead to increased toxicity and/or local recurrences with SBRT. In this multi-institutional study, we hypothesized that direct visualization provided by MR guidance could allow the use of small treatment volumes to spare normal tissues while maintaining clinical outcomes despite the aforementioned uncertainties in MR-guided treatment. Methods and materials:Patients with primary liver tumors or metastatic lesions treated with MR-guided liver SBRT were reviewed at 3 institutions. Toxicity was assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. Freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and ?2 test. Results:The study population consisted of 26 patients: 6 hepatocellular carcinomas, 2 cholangiocarcinomas, and 18 metastatic liver lesions (44% colorectal metastasis). The median follow-up was 21.2 months. The median dose delivered was 50 Gy at 10 Gy/fraction. No grade 4 or greater gastrointestinal toxicities were observed after treatment. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival in this cohort is 69% and 60%, respectively. At the median follow-up, FFLP for this cohort was 80.4%. FFLP for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas, colorectal metastasis, and all other lesions were 100%, 75%, and 83%, respectively. Conclusions:This study describes the first clinical outcomes of MR-guided liver SBRT. Treatment was well tolerated by patients with excellent local control. This study lays the foundation for future dose escalation and adaptive treatment for liver-based primary malignancies and/or metastatic disease.

Project description:Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a difficult malignancy to treat surgically because of its anatomical location and its frequent association with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by liver transplantation in lymph node-negative patients has been advanced by select liver transplant centers for the treatment of patients with unresectable disease. This approach has most commonly used external-beam radiotherapy in combination with biliary brachytherapy and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Our center recently embarked on a protocol using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) followed by capecitabine in lymph node-negative patients until liver transplantation. We, therefore, retrospectively determined the tolerability and pathological response in this pilot study. During a 3-year period, 17 patients with unresectable hilar CCA were evaluated for treatment under this protocol. In all, 12 patients qualified for neoadjuvant therapy and were treated with SBRT (50-60 Gy in 3-5 fractions over the course of 2 weeks). After 1 week of rest, capecitabine was initiated at 1330 mg/m(2) /day, and it was continued until liver transplantation. During neoadjuvant therapy, there were 35 adverse events in all, with cholangitis and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia being the most common. Capecitabine dose reductions were required on 5 occasions. Ultimately, 9 patients were listed for transplantation, and 6 patients received a liver transplant. The explant pathology of hilar tumors showed at least a partial treatment response in 5 patients, with extensive tumor necrosis and fibrosis noted. Additionally, high apoptotic indices and low proliferative indices were measured during histological examinations. Eleven transplant-related complications occurred, and the 1-year survival rate after transplantation was 83%. In this pilot study, neoadjuvant therapy with SBRT, capecitabine, and liver transplantation for unresectable CCA demonstrated acceptable tolerability. Further studies will determine the overall future efficacy of this therapy.