Dataset Information

Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 level predicts disease progression in interstitial lung disease.

ABSTRACT: Disease progression (DP) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) is variable and difficult to predict. In previous reports, serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) was suggested to be useful in diagnosing and predicting survival in ILD. The aim of our study was to investigate the usefulness of serum KL-6 as a predictor of DP in ILD. Clinical data of 199 patients with ILD (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: 22.8%) were prospectively collected and serum KL-6 levels were measured. DP was defined as a relative decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) ? 10%, acute exacerbation, or death during follow-up. The median follow-up period was 11.1 months. The mean age of the subjects was 62.2 years, and 59.8% were male. DP occurred in 21.6% of patients. The progressed group showed lower FVC, lower diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, lower the minimum oxygen saturation during the 6-minute walk test, higher fibrosis scores on high-resolution computed tomography, and higher KL-6 levels (826.3 vs. 629.0 U/mL; p < 0.001) than those of the non-progressed group. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, serum KL-6 levels were a significant predictor of DP in ILD (area under the curve = 0.629, p = 0.009, and the optimal cut-off level was 811 U/mL). In multivariable Cox analysis, high serum KL-6 levels (? 800 U/mL) were only independently associated with DP in ILD (HR 2.689, 95% CI 1.445-5.004, P = 0.002). Serum KL-6 levels might be useful to predict DP in patients with ILD.

SUBMITTER: Ko UW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7746162 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 level predicts disease progression in interstitial lung disease.

Ko Ui Won UW Cho Eun Jung EJ Oh Heung-Bum HB Koo Hyun Jung HJ Do Kyung-Hyun KH Song Jin Woo JW

PloS one 20201217 12

Disease progression (DP) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) is variable and difficult to predict. In previous reports, serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) was suggested to be useful in diagnosing and predicting survival in ILD. The aim of our study was to investigate the usefulness of serum KL-6 as a predictor of DP in ILD. Clinical data of 199 patients with ILD (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: 22.8%) were prospectively collected and serum KL-6 levels were measured. DP was defined as a relative d ...[more]

PMID: 33332430

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe aim of the study was to estimate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and surfactant protein D (SP-D) for identifying interstitial lung disease (ILD) from non-ILD among connective tissue disease (CTD) patients.Materials and methodsOriginal articles on the diagnostic accuracy of serum KL-6 and SP-D in differentiating CTD-ILD from CTD-nonILD were identified from three public databases. The overall quality of evidence and methodologic quality of each eligible study were assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, respectively. We used the bivariate model to calculate random-effect sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and area under curve. Furthermore, trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to determine whether sample sizes incorporated in the meta-analysis were powerful for evaluating the diagnostic utility. Bayesian network analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2 serum biomarkers in differentiating ILD among CTD patients and various subgroups.ResultsTwenty-nine studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. No threshold effects were observed (all P values >.05). For diagnosis of ILD among CTD patients, overall sensitivity and specificity of serum KL-6 were 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.82) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.93), whereas those for serum SP-D were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45-0.80) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.93). Comprehensive comparison of 2 circulating biomarkers using back-calculated likelihood ratio (LR) demonstrated that serum KL-6 corresponded to a higher LR+ and a lower LR- in comparison to serum SP-D, as well as in SSc-ILD. TSA indicated that evidence for serum KL-6 and SP-D in identifying CTD-ILD is powerful; nonetheless, more trials were needed for validation of serum KL-6 and SP-D in differentiating CTD-ILD subtypes, including different CTD and ethnicities.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis suggested that serum KL-6 had superior diagnostic accuracy to SP-D for differentiating ILD from non-ILD among CTD patients, providing a convenient and non-invasive approach for screening and management of ILD among CTD patients.

Project description:Background and objectivesThe highly variable clinical course of interstitial lung disease (ILD) makes it difficult to predict patient prognosis. Serum surfactant protein-A (SP-A) and Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) are known prognostic biomarkers. However, the clinical or pathophysiological differences in patients with these biomarkers have not been well evaluated. We investigated the clinical and pathophysiological differences through the comparison of SP-A and KL-6 levels before and after treatment.MethodsThis study included retrospective data from 91 patients who were treated for ILD between August 2015 and September 2019. Serum SP-A and KL-6 levels were measured before and after treatment. The patients were followed up for 3 months.ResultsChanges in the serum biomarkers (Delta SP-A and Delta KL-6) were found to be significantly correlated (rs = 0.523, P < 0.001); Delta SP-A and Delta KL-6 were inversely correlated with changes in pulmonary function (% predicted values of diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide [DLCO], forced vital capacity [FVC], and forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]). Patients were divided into four groups based on their Delta SP-A and Delta KL-6 levels in a cluster analysis (G1, G2, G3, and G4). Both SP-A and KL-6 were elevated in the G1 group, with all the patients enrolled classified as progressive or unchanged, and 86.4% of patients showed improved disease activity in the G4 group, where both SP-A and KL-6 levels were reduced. In the G2 group, only SP-A levels decreased post-treatment, indicating an improvement in respiratory function; the patients were not at the end stage of the disease. Only the SP-A levels increased in the G3 group with immunosuppressive treatment.ConclusionsReduced serum SP-A and/or KL-6 levels are associated with improved lung function in patients with ILD. Some patients only showed a decrease in SP-A levels could prognosis an improvement in respiratory function. When only SP-A is increased, it may imply that the patients are at an early stage of disease progression. As a result, for proper disease monitoring, measuring both markers is important.

Project description:BackgroundThe presence of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is relatively common in patients with emphysema. This has been designated combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). CPFE had worse prognosis than emphysema alone. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels as a biomarker of alveolar type 2 epithelial cell injury, which is widely used to identify the presence of ILD, whether it can differentiate CPFE from COPD remains unknown.Methods259 patients from Xiangya Hospital with diagnosis of COPD, with or without ILD, and who had KL-6 tests were recruited for this retrospective analysis. Recorded data included demographic information, comorbidities, inflammatory biomarkers. Results of CT and pulmonary function tests were collected one week before or after KL-6 measurements.ResultsAmong 259 patients, 52 patients were diagnosed with CPFE. The mean age was 67.39 ± 8.14 yeas. CPFE patients had higher ratio of rheumatic diseases (21.2 % vs 7.2 %, P = 0.003). CPFE patients exhibited higher values of FEV1 (1.97 vs 1.57, P = 0.002) and FEV1/FVC ratio (69.46 vs 57.64, P < 0.001) compared to COPD patients. CPFE patients had higher eosinophil counts, percentage of eosinophils, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin levels and lower platelet counts. Serum KL-6 levels were higher in CPFE group compared to COPD group (574.95 vs 339.30 U/mL, P < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression showed that KL-6 level was an independent predictive factor for the presence of ILD among COPD patients. The AUC of serum KL-6 levels to differentiate CPFE was 0.711, with 95 % CI being 0.635 to 0.787. The cutoff point of KL-6 level was 550.95 U/mL with 57.7 % sensitivity and 79.7 % specificity for the discrimination of CPFE from COPD.ConclusionCPFE patients show higher KL-6 levels compared to isolated COPD, suggesting the potential of KL-6 as a practical screening tool for interstitial lung disease, specifically CPFE. A KL-6 threshold of 550.95 U/mL in COPD patients may indicate a high need for high-resolution chest computed tomography to detect fibrosis.

Dataset Information

Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 level predicts disease progression in interstitial lung disease.

Publications

Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 level predicts disease progression in interstitial lung disease.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets