Dataset Information

Genotyping data of routinely processed matched primary/metastatic tumor samples.

ABSTRACT: Genotypic and phenotypic comparisons of tumors in multiple tissue samples from the same patient are important for understanding disease evolution and treatment possibilities. Panel NGS genotyping is currently widely used in this context, whereby NGS variant filtering and final evaluation constitute the basis for meaningful comparisons. Here, we present the genotype data used for genotype / phenotype comparisons between matched primary / metastatic colorectal tumors in the work by Chatzopoulos et al (doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.10.009), as well as the process followed for obtaining these data. We describe key issues while processing routinely formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumors for genotyping, NGS application (Ion Torrent), a stringent variant filtering algorithm for genotype analyses in FFPE tissues and particularly in matched tumor samples, and provide the respective datasets. Apart from research, tumor NGS genotyping is currently applied for clinical diagnostic purposes in Oncology. The datasets and method description provided herein (a) are important for comprehending the peculiarities of FFPE tumor genotyping, which is still mostly based on principles of germline DNA genotyping; (b) can be used in pooled analyses, e.g., of primary / metastatic tumors for the investigation of tumor evolution.

SUBMITTER: Kotoula V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7749371 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genotyping data of routinely processed matched primary/metastatic tumor samples.

Kotoula Vassiliki V Chatzopoulos Kyriakos K Papadopoulou Kyriaki K Giannoulatou Eleni E Koliou Georgia-Angeliki GA Karavasilis Vasilios V Pazarli Elissavet E Pervana Stavroula S Kafiri Georgia G Tsoulfas Georgios G Chrisafi Sofia S Sgouramali Helen H Papakostas Pavlos P Pectasides Dimitrios D Hytiroglou Prodromos P Pentheroudakis George G Fountzilas George G

Data in brief 20201211

Genotypic and phenotypic comparisons of tumors in multiple tissue samples from the same patient are important for understanding disease evolution and treatment possibilities. Panel NGS genotyping is currently widely used in this context, whereby NGS variant filtering and final evaluation constitute the basis for meaningful comparisons. Here, we present the genotype data used for genotype / phenotype comparisons between matched primary / metastatic colorectal tumors in the work by Chatzopoulos et ...[more]

PMID: 33365374

Similar Datasets

Project description:Comparison of gene expression profiles between a primary melanoma and an early metastatic specimen from the same patient will provide essential biological insight into early metastatic processes. The DASL (cDNA mediated annealing, selection, extension and ligation) assay has been used to generate gene expression data for 502 cancer-related genes from very small formalin-fixed sentinel node biopsy (SNB) melanoma samples, this data has been further compared with gene expression of the matched formalin-fixed primary melanoma. Tissue was sampled from twenty-five SNB deposits using laser capture microdissection. The mean number of genes detected using DASL with SNB samples was lower than when using a core of primary melanoma tumor (242 versus 434 genes). A large proportion of SNB samples failed (<240 genes detected) the assay (57.7%). Area of tissue microdissected, RNA concentration and qRT-PCR quality control did not predict performance of samples on the array but age of sampled tissue negatively correlated with number of genes detected (p=0.01). For samples that performed successfully, matched primary samples were available for 10 samples. Gene expression profiles correlated between all matched tumor pairs (Spearman’s rho 0.15-0.80, p<0.01), although a number of genes were differentially expressed between nodal and primary tumors in all tumor pairs. This study demonstrates that the DASL assay can be used to generate gene expression data from small formalin-fixed samples, but not consistently. Differentially expressed genes were identified across 10 matched primary and nodal tumor pairs suggesting that the DASL assay could be used to derive essential biological information about early metastasis. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded SNB samples and primary tumors were identified from two study sets. In Study 1, population ascertained melanoma patients were recruited to a cohort in the period from 2000 till the present day. Eight positive SNB samples were identified, from patients whose primary tumors had already been sampled for DASL studies. In Study 2, seventeen positive SNB samples were identified in a study designed to identify predictors of sentinel node positivity and relapse (SNB study). One nodal RNA sample, microdissected from a diagnostic H&E slide, was not sent for DASL analysis because of low RNA concentration (0.37 ng/μl), therefore a total of 26 nodal samples (including 2 replicate samples) were supplied to the Illumina DASL service provider. Of the 11 samples successfully yielding gene expression data, 10 had matched primary samples (e.g., Node_1 and Primary_1) for which gene expression data were available and is presented in this data set.

Project description:BackgroundObservations of recurrent somatic mutations in tumors have led to identification and definition of signaling and other pathways that are important for cancer progression and therapeutic targeting. As tumor cells contain both an individual's inherited genetic variants and somatic mutations, challenges arise in distinguishing these events in massively parallel sequencing datasets. Typically, both a tumor sample and a "normal" sample from the same individual are sequenced and compared; variants observed only in the tumor are considered to be somatic mutations. However, this approach requires two samples for each individual.ResultsWe evaluate a method of detecting somatic mutations in tumor samples for which only a subset of normal samples are available. We describe tuning of the method for detection of mutations in tumors, filtering to remove inherited variants, and comparison of detected mutations to several matched tumor/normal analysis methods. Filtering steps include the use of population variation datasets to remove inherited variants as well a subset of normal samples to remove technical artifacts. We then directly compare mutation detection with tumor-only and tumor-normal approaches using the same sets of samples. Comparisons are performed using an internal targeted gene sequencing dataset (n = 3380) as well as whole exome sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas project (n = 250). Tumor-only mutation detection shows similar recall (43-60%) but lesser precision (20-21%) to current matched tumor/normal approaches (recall 43-73%, precision 30-82%) when compared to a "gold-standard" tumor/normal approach. The inclusion of a small pool of normal samples improves precision, although many variants are still uniquely detected in the tumor-only analysis.ConclusionsA detailed method for somatic mutation detection without matched normal samples enables study of larger numbers of tumor samples, as well as tumor samples for which a matched normal is not available. As sensitivity/recall is similar to tumor/normal mutation detection but precision is lower, tumor-only detection is more appropriate for classification of samples based on known mutations. Although matched tumor-normal analysis is preferred due to higher precision, we demonstrate that mutation detection without matched normal samples is possible for certain applications.

Project description:BACKGROUND:BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) share many clinicopathologic features with right-sided colon tumors, including frequent peritoneal involvement. Because of the poorer outcomes associated with BRAF mutations, early enrollment in clinical trials has been encouraged. However, the use of standard eligibility and assessment criteria, such as measurable disease, has anecdotally impeded patient accrual and restricted appraisal of treatment response. We investigated whether the presence of a BRAF V600E mutation is differentially associated with sites and appearance of metastatic disease in patients matched by primary tumor location. METHODS:A total of 40 patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC were matched to 80 patients with BRAF wild-type mCRC by location of primary tumor (right or left colon; rectum), sex, and age. Associations between BRAF mutation status and clinicopathologic characteristics and metastatic sites were analyzed using proportion tests. Survival was summarized with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. RESULTS:The distribution of primary tumor locations was: 60% right colon, 30% left colon, and 10% rectum. Compared with BRAF wild-type tumors, BRAF-mutant tumors more commonly associated with peritoneal metastases (50% vs 31%; P=.045) and ascites (50% vs 24%; P=.0038). In patients with left colon primaries, BRAF mutations were associated with more frequent ascites (58% vs 12%; P=.0038) and less frequent liver metastases (42% vs 79%; P=.024). Among patients with right colon primaries, no significant difference in sites of disease by BRAF mutation status was observed. Disease was not measurable by RECIST 1.1 in 24% of patients with right-sided primary tumors, irrespective of BRAF mutation status. In the BRAF-mutated cohort, ascites correlated unfavorably with survival (hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.14, 4.83; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS:Greater frequency of ascites and peritoneal metastases, which pose challenges for RECIST 1.1 interpretation of therapeutic outcomes, are seen with BRAF-mutant mCRC, even when patients are matched for primary tumor location.

Dataset Information

Genotyping data of routinely processed matched primary/metastatic tumor samples.

Publications

Genotyping data of routinely processed matched primary/metastatic tumor samples.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets