Unknown

Dataset Information

0

High-Tensile Strength Tapes Show Greater Ultimate Failure Load and Less Stiffness Than High-Tensile Strength Sutures in a Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Porcine Model.


ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To compare the biomechanical properties of high-tensile strength tape and a high-tensile strength suture in subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a suture anchor in a porcine tendon model.

Methods

A total of 24 artificial composite (polymer and glass fiber) humeri and porcine flexor profundus tendons were used. Two types of suture materials, high-tensile strength sutures (group S) and high-tensile strength tapes (group T), were evaluated. After we inserted metallic suture anchors with either 2 sutures or tapes 5 cm from the superomedial corner of the greater tuberosity, a Krackow suture technique was used to secure the tendons. After a preload of 5 N for 2 minutes, a cyclic loading test from 5 to 70 N was conducted for 500 cycles. Finally, the specimen was loaded to failure at a rate of 1 mm/s.

Results

There were no significant between-group differences in elongation after cyclic loading and elongation at failure load for group S and group T (P = .977 and .630, respectively). The ultimate failure loads in group T (278.2 ± 54 N) were significantly greater than those in group S (249.4 ± 32 N) (P = .028). In contrast, the stiffness values in group T (28.5 ± 4.0 N/mm) were significantly lower than those in group S (32.3 ± 4.5 N) (P = .028). Ten specimens in group S and 8 specimens in group T failed, with tendons being cut through by the sutures, whereas the other 2 specimens in group S and 4 specimens in group T failed due to suture breakage.

Conclusions

Using high-tensile strength tapes in subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a suture anchor leads to significantly greater ultimate failure load as compared with using high-tensile strength sutures in a porcine model. Although lower levels of stiffness were found in high-tensile strength tape group, the difference in the means were not large between 2 groups.

Clinical relevance

A strong suture-tendon structure may prevent clinical failure of a subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a suture anchor.

SUBMITTER: Hong CK 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7754602 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

High-Tensile Strength Tapes Show Greater Ultimate Failure Load and Less Stiffness Than High-Tensile Strength Sutures in a Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Porcine Model.

Hong Chih-Kai CK   Su Wei-Ren WR   Kuan Fa-Chuan FC   Chen Yueh Y   Chiang Chen-Hao CH   Hsu Kai-Lan KL  

Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation 20201015 6


<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare the biomechanical properties of high-tensile strength tape and a high-tensile strength suture in subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a suture anchor in a porcine tendon model.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 24 artificial composite (polymer and glass fiber) humeri and porcine flexor profundus tendons were used. Two types of suture materials, high-tensile strength sutures (group S) and high-tensile strength tapes (group T), were evaluated. After we inserted metallic suture anc  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9134021 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7253779 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5621616 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9051893 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5622588 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7189024 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5793228 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9402417 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5621619 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5795267 | biostudies-literature