Dataset Information

Consistency evaluation of Liferiver, Yaneng, Darui, and the Cobas 4800 test for high-risk human papillomavirus screening.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In recent years, several high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) tests have been developed. The assay capabilities need to be systematically reviewed. Here, we compared the clinical sample performance of three novel HR-HPV assays (Liferiver, Yaneng, and Darui) based on different platforms with the widely adopted cobas4800 test.

Methods

A total of 346 cervical swabs from women who were screened for cervical cancer were analyzed for the presence of 14 HR-HPV genotypes. The distinction between the four assays was investigated by the genotyping and direct sequencing.

Results

The positive rates of the four assays ranged from 61.56% to 64.16%. The overall concordance was 88.15%. The Yaneng assays displayed the best sensitivity (100%) and specificity (98.43%). The sensitivity (98.17%) and specificity (98.43%) of the Darui assay were superior to those of the cobas4800 test (97.72% and 93.70%, respectively). The Liferiver assay displayed comparable sensitivity with the cobas4800 test (95.89% and 97.72%, respectively). The specificity of the cobas4800 was lower than that of the Liferiver assay (93.70% vs. 97.64%).

Conclusions

The three novel HR-HPV assays displayed good agreement with the cobas4800 test. The analytical performance of all four fulfilled the requirements of sensitivity and specificity for HR-HPV detection.

SUBMITTER: Wang M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7755768 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Consistency evaluation of Liferiver, Yaneng, Darui, and the Cobas 4800 test for high-risk human papillomavirus screening.

Wang Mengmeng M Ji Xiang X Dou Xiaowen X Tang Huamei H Kan Lijuan L Wu Wei W Chen Dayang D Zong Zengyan Z Xiong Dan D Zhang Xiuming X

Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 20200819 12

<h4>Background</h4>In recent years, several high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) tests have been developed. The assay capabilities need to be systematically reviewed. Here, we compared the clinical sample performance of three novel HR-HPV assays (Liferiver, Yaneng, and Darui) based on different platforms with the widely adopted cobas4800 test.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 346 cervical swabs from women who were screened for cervical cancer were analyzed for the presence of 14 HR-HPV genotypes. Th ...[more]

PMID: 32813301

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo provide the first report on the main outcomes from the prevalence and incidence rounds of a large pilot of routine primary high risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing in England, compared with contemporaneous primary liquid based cytology screening.DesignObservational study.SettingThe English Cervical Screening Programme.Participants578 547 women undergoing cervical screening in primary care between May 2013 and December 2014, with follow-up until May 2017; 183 970 (32%) were screened with hrHPV testing.InterventionsRoutine cervical screening with hrHPV testing with liquid based cytology triage and two early recalls for women who were hrHPV positive and cytology negative, following the national screening age and interval recommendations.Main outcome measuresFrequency of referral for a colposcopy; adherence to early recall; and relative detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse from hrHPV testing compared with liquid based cytology in two consecutive screening rounds.ResultsBaseline hrHPV testing and early recall required approximately 80% more colposcopies, (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.73 to 1.82), but detected substantially more cervical intraepithelial neoplasia than liquid based cytology (1.49 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse, 1.43 to 1.55; 1.44 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse, 1.36 to 1.51) and for cervical cancer (1.27, 0.99 to 1.63). Attendance at early recall and colposcopy referral were 80% and 95%, respectively. At the incidence screen, the 33 506 women screened with hrHPV testing had substantially less cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse than the 77 017 women screened with liquid based cytology (0.14, 0.09 to 0.23).ConclusionsIn England, routine primary hrHPV screening increased the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse and cervical cancer by approximately 40% and 30%, respectively, compared with liquid based cytology. The very low incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse after three years supports extending the screening interval.

Dataset Information

Consistency evaluation of Liferiver, Yaneng, Darui, and the Cobas 4800 test for high-risk human papillomavirus screening.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Consistency evaluation of Liferiver, Yaneng, Darui, and the Cobas 4800 test for high-risk human papillomavirus screening.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets