Dataset Information

First Line Systemic Treatment for MALT Lymphoma-Do We Still Need Chemotherapy? Real World Data from the Medical University Vienna.

ABSTRACT: There is no clear therapeutic algorithm for mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma beyond Helicobacter pylori eradication and while chemotherapy-based regimens are standard for MALT lymphoma patients in need of systemic treatment, it appears of interest to also investigate chemotherapy-free strategies. We have retrospectively assessed MALT lymphoma patients undergoing upfront systemic treatment, classified either as chemotherapy (=classical cytostatic agents +/- rituximab) or immunotherapy (=immunomodulatory agents or single anti-CD20 antibodies) at the Medical University Vienna 1999-2019. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). In total, 159 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 67 months. The majority of patients had extragastric disease (80%), but we also identified 32 patients (20%) with Helicobacter pylori negative or disseminated gastric lymphoma. Regarding the type of first line treatment and outcome, 46% (74/159) received a chemotherapy-based regimen and 54% (85/159) immunotherapy including IMiDs lenalidomide/thalidomide (37%), anti-CD20-anitbodies rituximab/ofatumumab (27%), macrolides clarithromycin/azithromycin (27%) and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (9%). Median PFS was 76 months (95%CI 50-102), and while the overall response (90% vs. 68%, p < 0.01) and the complete remission rate (75% vs. 43%, p < 0.01) was significantly higher for chemotherapy, there was no difference in PFS between chemotherapy (median 81 months, 95%CI 47-116) and immunotherapy (76 months, 95%CI 50-103, p = 0.57), suggesting comparable long-term outcomes. To conclude, our data show higher response rates with chemo- compared to immunotherapy, but this did not translate into a superior PFS. Given the biological background of MALT lymphoma, and the favorable toxicity profile of novel immunomodulatory treatments, this should be further investigated.

SUBMITTER: Kiesewetter B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7761357 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

First Line Systemic Treatment for MALT Lymphoma-Do We Still Need Chemotherapy? Real World Data from the Medical University Vienna.

Kiesewetter Barbara B Simonitsch-Klupp Ingrid I Mayerhoefer Marius E ME Dolak Werner W Lukas Julius J Raderer Markus M

Cancers 20201126 12

There is no clear therapeutic algorithm for mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma beyond Helicobacter pylori eradication and while chemotherapy-based regimens are standard for MALT lymphoma patients in need of systemic treatment, it appears of interest to also investigate chemotherapy-free strategies. We have retrospectively assessed MALT lymphoma patients undergoing upfront systemic treatment, classified either as chemotherapy (=classical cytostatic agents +/- rituximab) or immunoth ...[more]

PMID: 33256131

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe choice of a primary treatment for ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (OAML) depends on the extent of tumor spread. However, radiotherapy is commonly used as a first-line therapy despite ophthalmic complications, because most OAMLs are in a limited stage of progression. However, the initial therapeutic modality, including chemotherapy and treatment of the advanced stage, has not been fully established for OAML. Therefore, we evaluated the optimal therapeutic options and survival outcome-related parameters for patients with primary OAML.MethodsWe evaluated 208 consecutive patients with primary OAML who were diagnosed at the Catholic University Lymphoma Group between January 2004 and April 2015.FindingsDuring a median follow-up of 70.0 months (range, 3.2-182.0 months) in 208 patients with primary OAML, most patients were female and the median age was 46 years old. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 13 years were excellent (92.7% and 69.7%, respectively). Of the 117 patients who received the first-line radiotherapy, 92% achieved complete remission (CR), usually by being treated with less than 30 Gy. Radiation-related ophthalmic complications including dry eye syndrome (59%) and cataract (22%) caused a decline in the quality of life (QoL). Chemotherapy alone was used to treat 86 OAML patients, with 84.9% achieving CR and 12.8% achieving partial remission with tolerable toxicities. There were no differences in survival outcomes between patients treated with radiotherapy versus those treated with rituximab-containing chemotherapy, although the latter group had more advanced stages of OAML (OS, p = 0.057; PFS, p = 0.075).InterpretationOAML patients were predominantly female and relatively young, and radiotherapy as a primary therapeutic option was more likely to lead to radiation-related complications, resulting in lower QoL. On the other hand, frontline chemotherapy showed consistent therapeutic outcomes with tolerable toxicities compared to radiotherapy, and there were no long-term or delayed adverse events. Therefore, when considering therapeutic efficacy and therapy-related QoL, chemotherapy is recommended for younger patients, and radiotherapy is recommended for older and chemotherapy-ineligible patients.FundingA National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2016R1A2B4007282).

Dataset Information

First Line Systemic Treatment for MALT Lymphoma-Do We Still Need Chemotherapy? Real World Data from the Medical University Vienna.

Publications

First Line Systemic Treatment for MALT Lymphoma-Do We Still Need Chemotherapy? Real World Data from the Medical University Vienna.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets