Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
We aimed to investigate the characteristic presentation of Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) in pediatrics and compare it with that in adults.Methods
We performed a retrospective review of medical records, laboratory findings, and disease course of pediatric MFS. The data were compared with those of adult MFS, and literature review was done. Unpaired and paired comparisons between groups were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum and signed-rank tests, respectively.Results
Median age for pediatric MFS was 9.8 ± 6.5 years. There were 5 (45.5%) male and 6 (54.5%) female patients. All patients had preceding infection. Two patients (22.2%) had tested positive for anti-GQ1b antibody. Ten patients (90.1%) were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin, and 2 (18.2%) also received intravenous methylprednisolone. Within one month, 8 (72.7%) patients showed recovery, and all 11 (100%) recovered fully within 3 months. Further, the pediatric group had higher frequency of unilateral involvement of ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, and autonomic symptoms but lower antiganglioside antibody positivity and manifestations of areflexia than the adult group.Conclusions
Neuro-ophthalmic manifestations and disease course of pediatric MFS were similar to those of adult MFS as stated in the literature. However, the presence of autonomic symptoms was higher and anti-GQ1b antibody positivity was lower in pediatric MFS than in adult MFS.
SUBMITTER: Jang Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7761853 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Jang Yeonji Y Choi Jae-Hwan JH Chae Jong Hee JH Lim Byung Chan BC Kim Seong-Joon SJ Jung Jae Ho JH
Journal of clinical medicine 20201203 12
<h4>Background</h4>We aimed to investigate the characteristic presentation of Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) in pediatrics and compare it with that in adults.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a retrospective review of medical records, laboratory findings, and disease course of pediatric MFS. The data were compared with those of adult MFS, and literature review was done. Unpaired and paired comparisons between groups were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum and signed-rank tests, respectively.<h4>Results</h4>M ...[more]