Dataset Information

Urinary Soluble CD163 and Disease Activity in Biopsy-Proven ANCA-Associated Glomerulonephritis.

ABSTRACT:

Background and objectives

ANCA-associated GN is a common cause of rapidly progressive GN, with high relapse rates. The early recognition of an ANCA-associated GN relapse is of importance to prevent loss of kidney function. Urinary soluble CD163 has been identified as a promising marker of active ANCA-associated GN. Previous studies, however, are limited by the lack of histologic data.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

We analyzed urinary soluble CD163 in 95 patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis who underwent a kidney biopsy. In total, 125 kidney tissue sections (first kidney biopsy, n=67; repeated biopsy, n=58) with concurrent 24-hour urine samples were studied. Correlation analyses comparing urinary soluble CD163 levels and morphologic features of ANCA-associated GN were performed using Spearman rank correlation analysis. The diagnostic performance of biomarkers to detect relapsing ANCA-associated GN was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis.

Results

High levels of urinary soluble CD163 were found in 96 (87%) of 110 biopsies with active ANCA-associated GN compared with one (7%) of 15 biopsies without active ANCA-associated GN and one (6%) of 17 healthy controls. Urinary soluble CD163 correlated with fibrinoid necrosis (Rho=0.48, P<0.001) and cellular crescents (Rho=0.70, P<0.001) on kidney biopsy. In repeated biopsies, urinary soluble CD163's sensitivity of 0.94 and specificity of 0.91 for the recognition of relapsing ANCA-associated GN appeared better than routine clinical measures. The presence of CD163⁺ cells in affected glomeruli confirmed urinary soluble CD163's origin.

Conclusions

Urinary soluble CD163 is associated with active ANCA-associated GN and correlates with histologic features as seen in ANCA-associated GN.

Podcast

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2020_11_17_CJN07210520_final.mp3.

SUBMITTER: Aendekerk JP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7769013 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivesThe histopathologic classification for ANCA-associated GN distinguishes four classes on the basis of patterns of injury. In the original validation study, these classes were ordered by severity of kidney function loss as follows: focal, crescentic, mixed, and sclerotic. Subsequent validation studies disagreed on outcomes in the crescentic and mixed classes. This study, driven by the original investigators, provides several analyses in order to determine the current position of the histopathologic classification of ANCA-associated GN.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsA validation study was performed with newly collected data from 145 patients from ten centers worldwide, including an analysis of interobserver agreement on the histopathologic evaluation of the kidney biopsies. This study also included a meta-analysis on previous validation studies and a validation of the recently proposed ANCA kidney risk score.ResultsThe validation study showed that kidney failure at 10-year follow-up was significantly different between the histopathologic classes (P<0.001). Kidney failure at 10-year follow-up was 14% in the crescentic class versus 20% in the mixed class (P=0.98). In the meta-analysis, no significant difference in kidney failure was also observed when crescentic class was compared with mixed class (relative risk, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.41). When we applied the ANCA kidney risk score to our cohort, kidney survival at 3 years was 100%, 96%, and 77% in the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P<0.001). These survival percentages are higher compared with the percentages in the original study.ConclusionsThe crescentic and mixed classes seem to have a similar prognosis, also after adjusting for differences in patient populations, treatment, and interobserver agreement. However, at this stage, we are not inclined to merge the crescentic and mixed classes because the reported confidence intervals do not exclude important differences in prognosis and because an important histopathologic distinction would be lost.