Dataset Information

Association between Use of Hydrochlorothiazide and Risk of Keratinocyte Cancers in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

ABSTRACT:

Background and objectives

Keratinocyte cancers, which primarily comprise squamous cell carcinomas and basal cell carcinomas, represent a major concern and potential risk for kidney transplant recipients. Hydrochlorothiazide, a diuretic widely used to treat hypertension, has been implicated in skin photosensitivity reaction. Recent studies conducted in the general population have found that hydrochlorothiazide use is associated with a higher risk of keratinocyte cancer, especially squamous cell carcinomas. High-risk groups, however, including transplant recipients were excluded from these. Our aim was to investigate whether hydrochlorothiazide use was associated with keratinocyte cancer in kidney transplant recipients on immunosuppressive therapy.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

In a single-center cohort of kidney (n=2155), combined kidney-pancreas (n=282), and pancreas (n=59) transplant recipients from the Données Informatisées VAlidées Transplantation (DIVAT) database transplanted between 2000 and 2017 in Nantes, France, we evaluated the association between hydrochlorothiazide exposure and keratinocyte cancers. Multivariable cause-specific, time-varying Cox models were used to estimate the relationship between hydrochlorothiazide exposure and the hazard of squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma, with hydrochlorothiazide designated as the time-dependent variable.

Results

Among the participants, 279 of 2496 (11%) were exposed to hydrochlorothiazide after the transplantation. Cumulative incidence rates of keratinocyte cancer by 10 and 15 years were 7% and 9% for squamous cell carcinomas, respectively, and 8% and 11% for basal cell carcinomas, respectively. We found a relationship between exposure to hydrochlorothiazide and the risk of squamous cell carcinomas (hazard ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 3.28). In contrast, we found no association between hydrochlorothiazide exposure and basal cell carcinomas (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 1.15).

Conclusions

In a single-center cohort of kidney, combined kidney-pancreas, and pancreas transplant recipients, exposure to hydrochlorothiazide was associated with a two-fold higher risk of squamous cell carcinoma and no higher risk of basal cell carcinoma.

SUBMITTER: Letellier T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7769023 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI; cyclosporine, tacrolimus) are critical for kidney transplant immunosuppression, but have multiple potential drug interactions, such as with macrolide antibiotics. Macrolide antibiotics (clarithromycin, erythromycin, and azithromycin) are often used to treat atypical infections. Clarithromycin and erythromycin inhibit CNI metabolism and increase the risk of CNI nephrotoxicity, while azithromycin does not. Objective:To determine the frequency of CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions, the proportion who receive post-prescription monitoring, and the risk of adverse drug events in kidney transplant recipients. Design:Retrospective cohort study. Setting:We used linked health care databases in Alberta, Canada. Patients:We included 293 adult kidney transplant recipients from 2008-2015 who were co-prescribed a CNI and macrolide. Measurements:The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause hospitalization, acute kidney injury (creatinine increase ?0.3 mg/dL or 1.5 times baseline), or death within 30 days of the macrolide prescription. Methods:We identified CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions and compared outcomes in those who received clarithromycin/erythromycin versus azithromycin. We used a linear mixed-effects model to examine the mean change in serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Results:Of the 293 recipients who were co-prescribed a CNI and a macrolide, 38% (n = 112) were prescribed clarithromycin/erythromycin while 62% (n = 181) were prescribed azithromycin. Compared with azithromycin users, clarithromycin/erythromycin users were less likely to have outpatient serum creatinine monitoring post-prescription (56% vs 69%, P = .03). There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the 2 groups (17% vs 11%, P = .11); however, the risk of all-cause hospitalization was higher in the clarithromycin/erythromycin group (10% vs 3%, P = .02). The mean decrement in eGFR was significantly greater in the clarithromycin/erythromycin versus azithromycin group (-5.4 vs -1.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .05). Limitations:We did not have CNI levels to correlate with the timing of CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions. We also did not have information regarding the indications for macrolide prescriptions. Conclusion:Clarithromycin and erythromycin were frequently co-prescribed in kidney transplant recipients on CNIs despite known drug interactions. Clarithromycin/erythromycin use was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization compared with azithromycin users. Safer prescribing practices in kidney transplant recipients are warranted.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients [SOTRs] have elevated rates of certain rare cancers caused by viruses. Evaluating risk of rare cancers among SOTRs may provide etiological clues for additional cancers linked to poor immunity and viral infections. METHODS:We performed a cohort study of 262,455 SOTRs (1987-2014) from the US SOTR registry linked to 17 population-based cancer registries. First cancers in SOTRs were categorized using an established classification scheme based on site and histology. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) compared risk in SOTRs to the general population. We used Poisson regression to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) according to immune-related SOTR characteristics, including time since transplant (i.e., duration of immunosuppression). All statistical tests are two-sided. RESULTS:We examined 694 distinct cancer subtypes, with 33 manifesting statistically significantly elevated SIRs (Bonferroni p?<?7.2 x 10-5). All 33 are rare (incidence <6 per 100,000 person-years) and several have known viral etiology (e.g. Merkel cell carcinoma (SIR = 24.7, 95%CI = 20.8 to 29.1). Additional cancers that were increased include squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of the lip (SIR range = 18.3-19.8), eye/adnexa (SIR = 13.8, 95%CI = 7.9 to 22.3), salivary gland (SIR = 9.3, 95%CI = 6.1 to 13.5), and nasal cavity/sinuses (SIR = 4.5, 95%CI = 2.8 to 6.8); sebaceous adenocarcinoma (SIR = 34.3, 95%CI = 26.3 to 44.0); malignant fibrous histiocytoma (15.4); and subtypes of bladder, kidney, lung, and colon cancer (SIR range = 3.2-13.3). Incidence of several cancers increased over time since transplant (ptrend<0.05), including SCCs of the lip, salivary gland, and anogenital sites. CONCLUSIONS:SOTRs experience elevated rates of several rare cancers. Because some of these cancers exhibit aggressive behavior with poor outcomes, it is important to further characterize the role of immunity and the potential involvement of oncogenic viruses to improve prevention and treatment.

Project description:BackgroundPredicting allograft failure in kidney transplant recipients can help plan renal replacement therapy and guide patient-provider communication. The kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) accurately predicts the need for dialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but has not been validated in kidney transplant recipients.ObjectiveWe sought to validate the 4-variable KFRE (age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio [ACR]) for prediction of 2- and 5-year death-censored allograft failure.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingFour independent North American Cohorts from Ontario, Canada; Alberta, Canada; Manitoba, Canada; and Wisconsin, United States, between January 1999 and December 2017.PatientsAdult kidney transplant patients at 1-year posttransplantation.MeasurementsKidney failure risk as measured by the KFRE (eGFR, urine ACR, age, and sex).MethodsWe included all adult patients who had at least 1 serum creatinine and at least 1 urine ACR measurement approximately 1 year following kidney transplantation. The performance of the KFRE was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (C-statistic). C-statistics from the 4 cohorts were meta-analyzed using random-effects models.ResultsA total of 3659 patients were included. Pooled C-statistics were good in the entire population, at 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.91) for the 2-year KFRE and 0.73 (0.67-0.80) for the 5-year KFRE. Discrimination improved among patients with poorer kidney function (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2), with a C-statistic of 0.88 (0.78-0.98) for the 2-year KFRE and 0.83 (0.74-0.91) for the 5-year KFRE.LimitationsThe KFRE does not predict episodes of acute rejection and there was heterogeneity between cohorts.ConclusionsThe KFRE accurately predicts kidney failure in kidney transplant recipients at 1-year posttransplantation. Further validation in larger cohorts with longer follow-up times can strengthen the case for clinical implementation.