Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is one of the most common outpatient urological diagnoses, and its incidence is increasing. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been suggested for relieving local perineal symptoms associated with chronic prostatitis/CPPS. Despite several treatment methods, no causal or standardized treatment is available for CPPS. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of ESWT for the treatment of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis.

Materials and methods

Studies were collected using four search engines (Pubmed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOHost), on May 16, 2020; and assessed based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers performed study selection. Studies were then analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 for the meta-analysis.

Results

Seventy-four publications were initially retrieved, and three studies were considered for both qualitative and quantitative analyses. From these studies, we found that the use of ESWT was significantly associated with decreased pain domain (mean difference: -3.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.13, -2.73; p<0.001), improved urinary score (mean difference: -1.79; 95% CI -2.38, -1.21; p<0.001), improved quality of life (mean difference: -1.71; 95% CI -2.12, -1.31; p<0.001), and improved National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) score (mean difference: -5.45; 95% CI -5.74, -5.16; p<0.001) after 12 weeks of treatment.

Conclusion

ESWT is efficacious and safe in reducing pain and improving urinary condition, NIH-CPSI score, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-bacterial prostatitis.

SUBMITTER: Birowo P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7769278 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Birowo Ponco P Rangganata Ervandy E Rasyid Nur N Atmoko Widi W

PloS one 20201228 12

<h4>Purpose</h4>Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is one of the most common outpatient urological diagnoses, and its incidence is increasing. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been suggested for relieving local perineal symptoms associated with chronic prostatitis/CPPS. Despite several treatment methods, no causal or standardized treatment is available for CPPS. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of ESWT for the treatment of chronic non-bacterial prostati ...[more]

PMID: 33370372

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundExtracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been widely used for pain control in musculoskeletal disorders. Whether ESWT can relieve chronic low back pain (CLBP) and improve lumbar function is still unclear. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of relevant studies to comprehensively analyse and determine the efficacy and safety of ESWT for chronic low back pain.MethodsFour databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ESWT for CLBP. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to Cochrane systematic review criteria, relevant data were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. The primary outcomes were pain intensity, disability status, and mental health. The data were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) or weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. If I2 ≥ 50%, a random effects model was applied; otherwise, a fixed effects model was used.ResultsTwelve RCTs involving 632 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The ESWT group reported significantly more pain relief than the control group at 4 weeks (WMD = - 1.04; 95% CI = - 1.44 to - 0.65; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (WMD = - 0.85; 95% CI = - 1.30 to - 0.41; P < 0.001). Regarding the dysfunction index, ESWT led to significant improvement in lumbar dysfunction compared with the control group at 4 weeks (WMD = - 4.22; 95% CI = - 7.55 to - 0.89; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (WMD = - 4.51; 95% CI = - 8.58 to - 0.44; P = 0.03). For mental health, there was no significant difference between the ESWT group and the control group after 4 weeks of intervention (SMD = 1.17; 95% CI = - 0.10 to 2.45; P = 0.07).ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis found that ESWT provided better pain relief and improved lumbar dysfunction compared with the other interventions included, and no serious adverse effects were found. There was no significant effect of ESWT on the mental health of patients, but we hope to obtain more RCTs for further analysis in the future. Based on the pooled results, we suggest that ESWT is effective and safe for treating chronic low back pain.

Project description:BackgroundThe anti-spasticity efficacy of botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection has been well established for patients with chronic stroke; however, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), i.e. focused shockwave (FSW) and radial shockwave (RSW), has recently been applied. We aimed to investigate the comparative effectiveness of BoNT vs. ESWT in the reduction of spasticity among stroke survivors.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from the earliest record to September 2021 for randomized controlled trials. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) on the reduction of the Modified Ashworth Scale before or at the 6th post-treatment week (short-term) and between the 7th and 12th weeks (mid-term) after the intervention were calculated. Ranking probabilities of the WMD were simulated to determine which treatment had the potential to possess the best effectiveness. inplasy.com registration: INPLASY202170018.FindingsA total of 33 studies comprising 1,930 patients were enrolled. The network meta-analysis revealed that BoNT injections, FSW and RSW were better in spasticity reduction than the control treatment(s) at the short term, with WMDs of -0.69 (95% CI, -0.87 to -0.50), -0.36 (95% CI, -0.69 to -0.03) and -0.62 (95% CI, -0.84 to -0.40), respectively. Likewise, mid-term effects of BoNT injections, FSW and RSW also revealed superiority, with WMDs of -0.44 (95% CI, -0.62 to -0.26), -0.74 (95% CI, -1.26 to -0.23) and -0.79 (95% CI, -1.07 to -0.51), respectively. Ranking probability analysis revealed that RSW had the highest probability of being the best treatment for spasticity reduction at the short-term (62.2%) and mid-term (72.3%) periods during the follow up.InterpretationBoNT injections and ESWT are effective in alleviating post-stroke spasticity at the mid-term. The effectiveness of ESWT was comparable to BoNT injections, and RSW had the potential to be the best treatment for spasticity reduction among the three treatment options. More prospective trials incorporating head-to-head comparisons of BoNT injections vs. ESWT are needed to validate the role of ESWT in reducing post-stroke spasticity.FundingThe current research project was supported by (1) National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch; (2) Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 106-2314-B-002-180-MY3 and 109-2314-B-002-114-MY3); 3) Taiwan Society of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Project description:BackgroundCellulite is a widespread problem involving females' buttocks and thighs based on the female specific anatomy. Given the higher number of fat cells stored in female fatty tissue in contrast to males, and the aging process of connective tissue leads to an imbalance between lipogenesis and lipolysis with subsequent large fat cells bulging the skin. In addition, microcirculatory changes have been suggested, however remain largely unknown in a controlled clinical setting. We hypothesize that the combination of extracorporeal shockwave and a daily gluteal muscle strength program is superior to the gluteal muscle strength program alone in cellulite.Methods/designStudy designRandomized-controlled trial. IRB approval was granted at Hannover Medical School, Germany on May 22, 2009. For allocation of participants, a 1:1 ratio randomization was performed using opaque envelopes for the concealment of allocation. Reporting: according to CONSORT 2010. Eligible patients were females aged 18 or over and 65 or younger with cellulite with documented cellulite 1°-4° according to the Nürnberger score. Exclusion criteria were suspected or evident pregnancy, no cellulite, no informed consent or age under 18 years or above 65 years. Patients were recruited by advertisements in local regional newspapers and via the Internet.AnalysisIntention-to-treat.Outcome parametersa) Photonumeric severity scale, b) Nürnberger Score, c) circumference measurements, d) capillary blood flow, e) tissue oxygen saturation, f) postcapillary venous blood flow. Intervention group: Six sessions of extracorporeal focused shock wave for six sessions (2000 impulses, 0,25 mJ/m2 every 1-2 weeks) at both gluteal and thigh regions plus a specific gluteal strength exercise training.Control groupSix sessions of sham extracorporeal focused shock wave for six sessions (2000 impulses, 0,01 mJ/m2 every 1-2 weeks) at both gluteal and thigh regions plus a specific gluteal strength exercise training.Follow-up12 weeks. Blinding was achieved for all participants enrolled in the trial, the photograph taking the digital images for the primary outcome measure, the two assessors of the outcome measures, all additional health care providers and for the analyst from the biometrical department. Only one researcher (BJ) was aware of the group assignment performing the randomisation and the extracorporeal shock wave therapy.DiscussionThis randomised-controlled trial will provide much needed evidence on the clinical effectiveness of focused extracorporal shock wave therapy as an adjunct to gluteal strength training in females suffering cellulite.

Project description:Background: Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) that can be an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UFH). The efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in anticoagulation therapy in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain unknown. Methods: This study followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library databases to identify all relevant original studies estimating bivalirudin's efficacy and safety versus UFH as anticoagulation therapy in ECMO. The time limit for searching is from the search beginning to June 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. The meta-analysis (CRD42020214713) was performed via the RevMan version 5.3.5 Software and STATA version 15.1 Software. Results: Ten articles with 847 patients were included for the quantitative analysis. Bivalirudin can significantly reduce the incidence of major bleeding in children (I 2 = 48%, p = 0.01, odd ratio (OR) = 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04-0.66), patient thrombosis (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.02, OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37-0.93), in-circuit thrombosis/interventions (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.0005, OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0.68), and in-hospital mortality (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.007, OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88). Also, comparable clinical outcomes were observed in the incidence of major bleeding in adults (I 2 = 48%, p = 0.65, OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.46-1.62), 30-day mortality (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.61, OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.41-1.68), and ECMO duration in adults (I 2 = 41%, p = 0.75, mean difference (MD) = -3.19, 95% CI: -23.01-16.63) and children (I 2 = 76%, p = 0.65, MD = 40.33, 95% CI:-135.45-216.12). Conclusions: Compared with UFH, bivalirudin can be a safe and feasible alternative anticoagulant option to UFH as anticoagulation therapy in ECMO, especially for heparin resistance (HR) and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) cases.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets