Dataset Information

The Impact of Femoral Nerve Anesthesia on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Opioid Claims After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The impact of femoral nerve blocks (FNBs) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on clinical outcomes and pain management remains unclear. The present research investigates the impact that continuous and single-shot FNBs during TKA have on postoperative opioid claims and short-term clinical outcomes.

Methods

An administrative claims database was queried to identify patients who underwent primary TKA with a continuous FNB, single-shot FNB, or no FNB. More than 300,000 patients were analyzed from the database. Rates of opioid claims were compared via achi-square analysis. Incidence of postoperative complications was compared with multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Patients receiving a FNB had a significantly higher risk of falls both at 6 months (odds ratio [OR], 1.30) and 1 year postoperatively (OR, 1.25), as well as readmissions within 90 days (OR, 1.18) compared with patients without FNBs. The FNB cohort exhibited a higher risk of deep vein thrombosis (OR, 1.57), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.79), and cerebrovascular accident (OR, 1.20) during the inpatient stay. Relative to single-shot FNBs, continuous FNBs were associated with a higher risk of readmissions within 90 days and systemic complications, although the risk varied by age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. More patients without FNBs filed opioid claims within 1 year postoperatively, but the average total morphine milligram equivalents prescribed was comparable to patients who received FNBs.

Conclusions

FNBs during TKA place patients at a significantly higher risk of falls, readmissions, and systemic complications in the short term. The risk of readmission and systemic complications was higher for continuous FNBs. More patients without FNBs filed opioid claims postoperatively than patients who received FNBs.

SUBMITTER: Patel AH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7772446 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Impact of Femoral Nerve Anesthesia on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Opioid Claims After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Patel Akshar H AH Ross Bailey J BJ Ofa Sione A SA Flick Travis R TR Sanchez Fernando L FL Sherman William F WF

Arthroplasty today 20201121 4

<h4>Background</h4>The impact of femoral nerve blocks (FNBs) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on clinical outcomes and pain management remains unclear. The present research investigates the impact that continuous and single-shot FNBs during TKA have on postoperative opioid claims and short-term clinical outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>An administrative claims database was queried to identify patients who underwent primary TKA with a continuous FNB, single-shot FNB, or no FNB. More than 300, ...[more]

PMID: 33385044

Similar Datasets

Project description:The ideal local anesthetic regime for femoral nerve block that balances analgesia with mobility after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains undefined.We compared two volumes and concentrations of a fixed dose of ropivacaine for continuous femoral nerve block after TKA to a single injection femoral nerve block with ropivacaine to determine (1) time to discharge readiness; (2) early pain scores and analgesic consumption; and (3) functional outcomes, including range of motion and WOMAC scores at the time of recovery.Ninety-nine patients were allocated to one of three continuous femoral nerve block groups for this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial: a high concentration group (ropivacaine 0.2% infusion), a low concentration group (ropivacaine 0.1% infusion), or a placebo infusion group (saline 0.9% infusion). Infusions were discontinued on postoperative Day (POD) 2. The primary outcome was time to discharge readiness. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, pain, and functional outcomes. Ninety-three patients completed the study protocol; the study was halted early because of unanticipated changes to pain protocols at the host institution, by which time only 61% of the required number of patients had been enrolled.With the numbers available, the mean time to discharge readiness was not different between groups (high concentration group, 62 hours [95% confidence interval [CI], 51-72 hours]; low concentration group, 73 hours [95% CI, 63-83 hours]; placebo infusion group 65 hours [95% CI, 56-75 hours]; p = 0.27). Patients in the low concentration group consumed significantly less morphine during the period of infusion (POD 1, high concentration group, 56 mg [95% CI, 42-70 mg]; low concentration group, 35 mg [95% CI, 27-43 mg]; placebo infusion group, 48 mg [95% CI, 38-59 mg], p = 0.02; POD 2, high concentration group, 50 mg [95% CI, 41-60 mg]; low concentration group, 33 mg [95% CI, 24-42 mg]; placebo infusion group, 39 mg [95% CI, 30-48 mg], p = 0.04); however, there were no important differences in pain scores or opioid-related side effects with the numbers available. Likewise, there were no important differences in functional outcomes between groups.Based on this study, which was terminated prematurely before the desired sample size could be achieved, we were unable to demonstrate that varying the concentration and volume of a fixed-dose ropivacaine infusion for continuous femoral nerve block influences time to discharge readiness when compared with a conventional single-injection femoral nerve block after TKA. A low concentration of ropivacaine infusion can reduce postoperative opioid consumption but without any important differences in pain scores, side effects, or functional outcomes. These pilot data may be used to inform the statistical power of future randomized trials.Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Project description:BackgroundLocal infiltration anesthesia (LIA) and femoral nerve block (FNB) are commonly used analgesia methods after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is no definitive conclusion about which of these two analgesia modes is superior. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically evaluate the analgesic effects of LIA and FNB after TKA.MethodsWe used the terms "total knee replacement, knee replacement, total knee arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, local infiltration analgesia, periarticular infiltration, periarticular injection, intra-articular infiltration, intra-articular injection, peripheral nerve block, femoral nerve block" to search the PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Weipu databases. The search period was set from the date of establishment of the database to September 2021. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and network meta-analysis was performed using Stata14.0 and RevMan 5.30 software.ResultsNine articles were included for analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with LIA and FNB, the difference in opioid use [mean difference (MD) -4.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.26 to -1.45] was statistically significant. However, there was no significant difference between the static visual analogue score at 24 hours postoperatively (MD 0.20, 95% CI: -0.91 to 1.31), the visual analogue score for exercise visual analogy at 24 hours after surgery (MD 0.10, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.32), and the length of hospital stay (MD 0.05, 95% CI: -0.40 to 0.50).DiscussionLIA and FNB have similar effects on pain relief after TKA, but LIA can reduce the use of analgesic drugs and is easy to operate. Therefore, LIA can be used as the priority analgesic method for patients with TKA. However, multi-center, large-sample, high-quality, randomized controlled trials are still needed for further verification.

Project description:BackgroundPeriarticular anesthesia (PAI) with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) were 2 common type of pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is no consensus about PAI with LB shows better clinical outcome than FNB. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of PAI with LB and FNB for patients prepared for TKA.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs from PubMed (1966-2017.2), EMBASE (1980-2017.2), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2017.2), Web of Science (1966-2017.2), and Chinese Wanfang database (1980-2017.2) were searched. Continuous outcomes including visual analogue scale (VAS) at 24, 48, and 72?hours, total morphine consumption, length of hospital, and range of motion (ROM) were reported as the weighted mean difference with 95% and confidence interval (CI) and discontinuous outcomes (the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV]) were presented as relative risk with 95% CI. Random-effects model was adopted to analyze the relevant data.ResultsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 studies with 2407 patients were eligible and finally included in this meta-analysis (LB?=?1114, FNB?=?1293). There was no significant difference between VAS at 24, 4, and 72?hours, ROM, and the occurrence of PONV between PAI with LB group versus FNB group (P?>?0.05). Compared with the FNB group, PAI with LB was associated with a significant decrease in length of hospital stay by 0.43 day (MD?=?-0.43; 95% CI -0.60 to -0.27; P?=?0.001) and the total dose of total morphine consumption by (MD?=?-29.32; 95% CI -57.55 to -1.09; P?=?0.042).ConclusionsThe review of trials found that PAI with LB provided a significant beneficial effect over FNB in improving the pain or decreased the total morphine consumption in patients who underwent TKA. However, PAI with LB associated with less LOS than FNB. More high quality RCTs are still needed to identify the effects and optimal dose of LB for pain management after TKA.

Project description:BackgroundUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an established treatment option for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA). However, strict patient selection is crucial for its success. The proposed advantages include nearly natural knee kinematics, faster rehabilitation and better functional outcomes. Despite the aforementioned facts and it's proven cost-effectiveness, there are still hesitations for the use of UKA as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Key objectives of this study were therefore to assess clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) as well as patient's satisfaction after medial UKA in comparison to TKA.MethodsTo assess the outcome after UKA we conducted a prospective multi-center study. 116 patients with unicompartmental OA and indication for UKA were included. Overall 54 females and 62 males with an average age of 62.7 years (±9.8) and an average body mass index (BMI) of 29.2 (± 3.7) were recruited. Clinical results and PRO were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Follow-ups took place 3 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery including clinical examination, radiographs, assessment of PRO and adverse events. Pain and satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 (worst) to 10 (best)). For comparison with TKA a propensity score matched-pair analysis was performed to eliminate confounders. Matching criteria were gender, patient's age, BMI and comorbidities. A total of 116 matched-pairs were analysed.ResultsThere was no revision in the UKA group until 2 years after surgery. Revision rates were higher in the TKA group (0.6%). Preoperative KSS-Scores were higher within the UKA cohort (p < 0.001). After surgical treatment, PROMs displayed a significant improvement (p < 0,001) in both cohorts. Regarding the Knee-Score (Pain, Alignment, ROM) we observed no differences between cohorts after 12 months. The Function-Score demonstrated significantly better results in the UKA cohort (UKA vs. TKA 95 vs 80, p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was also higher in UKA patients (UKA vs TKA 9.0 vs 8.8, p = 0.019).ConclusionPatients of both cohorts showed high satisfaction after knee arthroplasty. UKA resulted in higher function scores compared to TKA without increased revision rate during short-term follow-up. Therefore, UKA is a good treatment option for unicompartmental OA.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT04598568 . Registered 22 October 2020 - Retrospectively registered.

Dataset Information

The Impact of Femoral Nerve Anesthesia on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Opioid Claims After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The Impact of Femoral Nerve Anesthesia on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Opioid Claims After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets