Dataset Information

Concurrent Surgical Management of Advanced Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Proximal Tibiofibular Joint With Compressive Peroneal Neuropathy: 3-Year Follow-Up On a Complex Case.

ABSTRACT: The proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) is susceptible to osteoarthritis (OA), making it a rare but potential source of lateral knee pain. Because PTFJ OA is a rare presentation of knee pain, no first-line treatment has been established and it can be missed in evaluation before total knee arthroplasty. We report an unusual case of a 59-year-old man who presented with advanced OA of both the knee and PTFJ, along with a progressive peroneal nerve palsy due to a large compressive ganglion cyst from the PTFJ. He was treated with concurrent total knee arthroplasty, peroneal nerve decompression, and resection of the fibular head and ganglion cyst, resulting in full recovery from his arthritic pain and resolution of his peroneal neuropathy. He remains free of symptoms without instability 3 years from the index surgery.

SUBMITTER: Herndon CL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7772449 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Concurrent Surgical Management of Advanced Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Proximal Tibiofibular Joint With Compressive Peroneal Neuropathy: 3-Year Follow-Up On a Complex Case.

Herndon Carl L CL Alonge Taiwo T McDermott Nance Erin E Cooper H John HJ

Arthroplasty today 20201205 4

The proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) is susceptible to osteoarthritis (OA), making it a rare but potential source of lateral knee pain. Because PTFJ OA is a rare presentation of knee pain, no first-line treatment has been established and it can be missed in evaluation before total knee arthroplasty. We report an unusual case of a 59-year-old man who presented with advanced OA of both the knee and PTFJ, along with a progressive peroneal nerve palsy due to a large compressive ganglion cyst from ...[more]

PMID: 33385040

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThigh muscle weakness is associated with knee discomfort and osteoarthritis disease progression. Little is known about the efficacy of high-intensity strength training in patients with knee osteoarthritis or whether it may worsen knee symptoms.ObjectiveTo determine whether high-intensity strength training reduces knee pain and knee joint compressive forces more than low-intensity strength training and more than attention control in patients with knee osteoarthritis.Design, setting, and participantsAssessor-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted at a university research center in North Carolina that included 377 community-dwelling adults (≥50 years) with body mass index (BMI) ranging from 20 to 45 and with knee pain and radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Enrollment occurred between July 2012 and February 2016, and follow-up was completed September 2017.InterventionsParticipants were randomized to high-intensity strength training (n = 127), low-intensity strength training (n = 126), or attention control (n = 124).Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes at the 18-month follow-up were Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) knee pain (0 best-20 worst; minimally clinically important difference [MCID, 2]) and knee joint compressive force, defined as the maximal tibiofemoral contact force exerted along the long axis of the tibia during walking (MCID, unknown).ResultsAmong 377 randomized participants (mean age, 65 years; 151 women [40%]), 320 (85%) completed the trial. Mean adjusted (sex, baseline BMI, baseline outcome values) WOMAC pain scores at the 18-month follow-up were not statistically significantly different between the high-intensity group and the control group (5.1 vs 4.9; adjusted difference, 0.2; 95% CI, -0.6 to 1.1; P = .61) or between the high-intensity and low-intensity groups (5.1 vs 4.4; adjusted difference, 0.7; 95% CI, -0.1 to 1.6; P = .08). Mean knee joint compressive forces were not statistically significantly different between the high-intensity group and the control group (2453 N vs 2512 N; adjusted difference, -58; 95% CI, -282 to 165 N; P = .61), or between the high-intensity and low-intensity groups (2453 N vs 2475 N; adjusted difference, -21; 95% CI, -235 to 193 N; P = .85). There were 87 nonserious adverse events (high-intensity, 53; low-intensity, 30; control, 4) and 13 serious adverse events unrelated to the study (high-intensity, 5; low-intensity, 3; control, 5).Conclusions and relevanceAmong patients with knee osteoarthritis, high-intensity strength training compared with low-intensity strength training or an attention control did not significantly reduce knee pain or knee joint compressive forces at 18 months. The findings do not support the use of high-intensity strength training over low-intensity strength training or an attention control in adults with knee osteoarthritis.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01489462.

Dataset Information

Concurrent Surgical Management of Advanced Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Proximal Tibiofibular Joint With Compressive Peroneal Neuropathy: 3-Year Follow-Up On a Complex Case.

Publications

Concurrent Surgical Management of Advanced Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Proximal Tibiofibular Joint With Compressive Peroneal Neuropathy: 3-Year Follow-Up On a Complex Case.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets