Dataset Information

637. Outcomes by Body Mass Index (BMI) in the STRIVE Phase 2 Trial of Once-Weekly Rezafungin for Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis Compared with Caspofungin

ABSTRACT: Abstract

Background

There is increasing evidence of antifungal underdosing in the treatment of invasive disease, particularly in special populations such as the obese. Body size is often an important variable affecting drug exposure, and pharmacokinetic (PK) models of antifungal dosing have suggested size-based dose adjustments to achieve target drug exposure. Rezafungin (RZF) is a novel echinocandin in Phase 3 development for treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) and for prevention of invasive fungal disease caused by Candida, Aspergillus, and Pneumocystis in blood and marrow transplant recipients. Distinctive PK properties of RZF (e.g., long half-life, extensive tissue distribution, and front-loaded drug exposure) lend themselves to RZF once-weekly (QWk) dosing and antifungal efficacy. In this sub-analysis of the Phase 2 STRIVE trial of RZF in the treatment of candidemia and/or IC, outcomes based on patient BMI were evaluated.

Methods

The STRIVE trial (NCT02734862) compared the safety and efficacy of RZF QWk compared with once-daily caspofungin (Fig. 1). For this subanalysis, data were stratified by BMI categories of < 30 kg/m2 and ? 30 kg/m2. Efficacy (overall response [resolution of clinical signs of infection + mycological eradication], mycological response, and investigator assessment of clinical response) and safety (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) endpoints by treatment group were evaluated, as well as PK data (area under the curve [AUC]) from RZF-treated patients. Figure 1.

Results

Mean BMI values were similar across treatment arms (26.9 kg/m2 in RZF Group 1 and 26.8 kg/m2 in RZF Group 2 and CAS arms). Efficacy outcomes at Day 14 were similar between BMI categories (Table 1). Rates of TEAEs were generally similar between BMI categories as well (Table 2), with no concerning safety trends. Following one dose of RZF 400 mg (Week 1), the ranges of AUCs by BMI category overlapped and there was a minor mean difference of ~20% (lower for those with BMI ? 30 kg/m2) (Fig. 2). Table 1 Table 2 Figure 2.

Conclusion

The safety, efficacy, and PK of RZF in the Phase 2 STRIVE trial was consistent across BMI categories. These results suggest that dose adjustments in obese patients are not necessary. These findings contribute to the evaluation of RZF in a range of patient populations and its ongoing development.

Disclosures

Shawn Flanagan, PhD, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Peter Pappas, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support) Taylor Sandison, MD, MPH, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Patrick M. Honore, MD, PhD, FCCM, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

SUBMITTER: Vazquez J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7777904 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract Background Rezafungin (RZF) is a novel echinocandin in Phase 3 development for treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) and for prevention of invasive fungal disease caused by Candida, Aspergillus, and Pneumocystis in blood and marrow transplant recipients. This analysis of the completed Phase 2 STRIVE trial (NCT02734862) of RZF treatment was conducted to evaluate outcomes based on baseline pathogen and susceptibility. Methods In STRIVE, adults (≥ 18 y) with systemic signs and mycological evidence of candidemia and/or IC were randomized to either RZF once weekly or caspofungin (CAS) once daily for ≥ 14 days (Fig. 1). The primary efficacy endpoint was Overall Response (resolution of clinical signs of infection + mycological eradication) at Day 14. For this analysis, outcomes by treatment group were stratified by Candida species and by its in vitro susceptibility (CLSI broth microdilution MIC values; M27-Ed4). Figure 1. Treatment Groups of the Phase 2 STRIVE Trial Results A total of 196 Candida isolates were recovered from 183 patients across all treatment groups (Fig. 2). C. albicans was the most common species, followed by C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis; non-albicans Candida comprised 54% of all baseline isolates (Fig. 2). Among all clinical isolates, MIC distributions and ranges for RZF were generally lower than or comparable to those for CAS (Table 1). The rate of Overall Response (as defined above) against C. parapsilosis was lower for CAS than for RZF (Table 2). Overall, outcomes by Candida species and MIC did not appear to be affected by MIC values for either RZF or CAS (Table 1). Figure 2. Candida Species Distribution and MIC ranges in the Phase 2 STRIVE Trial (mITT) Table 1. Overall Response Rates (%) for Most Frequently Isolated Candida Species at Baseline by Treatment Group and MIC Values (mITT) Table 2. Overall Response Rates (%) for Most Frequently Isolated Candida Species at Baseline by Treatment Group (mITT) Conclusion This analysis demonstrated RZF efficacy across multiple Candida species. RZF outcomes were similar to or better than those for CAS regardless of species identified. There was no clear correlation between increased MICs and clinical outcomes although, based on MICs, all isolates exhibited a wild-type in vitro susceptibility profile. These findings from STRIVE, together with future analyses from the ongoing Phase 3 trial of RZF treatment of candidemia and IC (ReSTORE; NCT03667690), will further our understanding of the relationships between MIC values and clinical outcomes in patients with candidemia or IC. Disclosures Jeffrey B. Locke, PhD, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Rolando Viani, MD, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Peter Pappas, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support) Mahmoud Ghannoum, PhD, Amplyx (Grant/Research Support)Cidara (Grant/Research Support)Scynexis (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) Taylor Sandison, MD, MPH, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)

Project description:During the past decade, the incidence of Candida infections in hospitalized patients has increased, with fluconazole being the most commonly prescribed systemic antifungal agent for these infections. However, the 2009 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) candidiasis guidelines recommend an echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia/invasive candidiasis in patients who are considered to be "moderately severe or severely" ill. To validate these guidelines, clinical trial data were reviewed.A secondary analysis of data from a previously published prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was performed; it compared anidulafungin with fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and candidemia. Patients with critical illness were identified at study entry by using the following criteria: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of ? 15, evidence of severe sepsis (sepsis and one or more end-organ dysfunctions) present, and/or patient was in intensive care. Global response rates were compared at the end of intravenous study treatment (the primary end point of the original study) and all-cause mortality at 14 and 28 days from study entry in this group.The patients (163 (66.5%) of 245) fulfilled at least one criterion for critical illness (anidulafungin, n = 89; fluconazole, n = 74). No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups. The global response rate was 70.8% for anidulafungin and 54.1% for fluconazole (P = 0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0 to 31.5); all-cause mortality was 10.1% versus 20.3% at 14 days (P = 0.08; 95% CI, -0.9 to 21.3) and was 20.2% versus 24.3% at 28 days (P = 0.57; 95% CI, -8.8 to 17.0) for anidulafungin and fluconazole, respectively.In this post hoc analysis, anidulafungin was more effective than fluconazole for treatment of severely ill patients with candidemia, thus supporting the 2009 IDSA guidelines.Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00058682.

Project description:IntroductionPatients with a history of chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation (SCT) and prolonged neutropenia are at risk for hepatic and/or splenic seeding of Candida. In our experience, hepatosplenic candidiasis (HSC) without documented candidemia often remains unrecognized.Case presentationsWe describe three cases of HSC without documented candidemia and the challenges in establishing the diagnosis and adequately treating this condition. The first patient had a history of SCT for treatment of breast cancer and was scheduled for hemihepatectomy for suspected liver metastasis. A second opinion at our institute resulted in the diagnosis of hepatic candidiasis without prior documented candidemia, for which she was treated successfully with fluconazole. The second case demonstrates the limitations of (blood and tissue) cultures and the value of molecular methods to confirm the diagnosis. Case 3 illustrates treatment challenges, with ongoing dissemination and insufficient source control despite months of antifungal therapy, eventually resulting in a splenectomy.Literature reviewA structured literature search was performed for articles describing any patient with HSC and documented blood culture results. Thirty articles were available for extraction of data on candidemia and HSC. Seventy percent (131/187) of patients with HSC did not have documented candidemia. The majority of HSC events were described in hematologic patients, although some cases were described in patients with solid tumors treated with SCT (n = 1) or chemotherapy and a history of leukopenia (n = 2). Current guidelines and practices for diagnosis and treatment are described.ConclusionClinicians should be aware that HSC most often occurs without documented candidemia. In case of persistent or unexplained fever or lesions in the liver and/or spleen, a history of neutropenia should place disseminated candidiasis in the differential diagnosis. HSC is not limited to hematological patients and may occur in patients with solid tumors treated with bone marrow-suppressing chemotherapy or SCT. In the latter group, HSC as alternative diagnosis for hepatic metastasis should be considered when lesions are not typical for metastasis. This might prevent unnecessary surgery or inappropriate treatment.Implications for practiceTimely diagnosis of hepatosplenic candidiasis (HSC) is challenging, but can prevent further complications and dissemination, and may even prevent unnecessary invasive procedures. Clinicians should realize that HSC often occurs without documented candidemia and that sensitivity of blood cultures for candidemia is limited. HSC is not strictly limited to hematologic patients and might also occur in patients with solid tumors treated with intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. Increased awareness for HSC in patients with any history of neutropenia is of importance to increase detection and prevent serious sequelae.

Project description:Anaemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease and prevalence increases with declining renal function. Renal anaemia has significant implications for the well-being and quality of life of patients and impacts on morbidity and mortality. Anaemia can be well managed by therapy with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Previous clinical trials have shown that the only human cell-line-derived ESA, epoetin delta, is well tolerated and effective in maintaining haemoglobin levels in anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease. The half-life of epoetin delta suggests that administration of this agent is feasible once weekly and once every two weeks. We report on the design and rationale of a trial to compare once weekly vs. twice weekly, and once weekly vs. once every two weeks dosing of epoetin delta.This is a randomized, open-label, multicentre trial. Patients aged 18 years or above with chronic kidney disease (Stages 3-5) are eligible to enter this trial. Two groups of patients form the trial population, those naïve to ESA therapy and those previously stable on ESA therapy. There are two primary objectives of this trial: 1) to demonstrate non-inferiority between twice weekly and once weekly dosing of epoetin delta in previously naïve patients (assessed by haemoglobin at Week 24); 2) to demonstrate non-inferiority between once weekly and once every two weeks dosing in previously stable patients (assessed by average haemoglobin over Weeks 16-24). Among the secondary analyses will be assessments of haematocrit, number(%) of patients meeting predefined targets for haemoglobin and haematocrit levels, and comparisons of average dose. All patients will receive study medication for 24 weeks and dose will be adjusted according to a predefined algorithm to achieve and maintain haemoglobin >or= 11 g/dL. All patients completing this trial are eligible to enter a 2-year follow-up study to enable monitoring of emergent adverse events, anti-erythropoietin antibody responses, maintenance of efficacy and changes in diabetic retinopathy status.To our knowledge, this trial is the first to randomize ESA-naïve patients to different dosing regimens of the same ESA. Data generated will help in guiding the most appropriate dosing frequency for epoetin delta, particularly in those patients new to epoetin delta therapy.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00450333.

Project description:BackgroundA once-weekly, 2.4-mg dose of subcutaneous semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is used to treat obesity in adults, but assessment of the drug in adolescents has been lacking.MethodsIn this double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled adolescents (12 to <18 years of age) with obesity (a body-mass index [BMI] in the 95th percentile or higher) or with overweight (a BMI in the 85th percentile or higher) and at least one weight-related coexisting condition. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (at a dose of 2.4 mg) or placebo for 68 weeks, plus lifestyle intervention. The primary end point was the percentage change in BMI from baseline to week 68; the secondary confirmatory end point was weight loss of at least 5% at week 68.ResultsA total of 201 participants underwent randomization, and 180 (90%) completed treatment. All but one of the participants had obesity. The mean change in BMI from baseline to week 68 was -16.1% with semaglutide and 0.6% with placebo (estimated difference, -16.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -20.3 to -13.2; P<0.001). At week 68, a total of 95 of 131 participants (73%) in the semaglutide group had weight loss of 5% or more, as compared with 11 of 62 participants (18%) in the placebo group (estimated odds ratio, 14.0; 95% CI, 6.3 to 31.0; P<0.001). Reductions in body weight and improvement with respect to cardiometabolic risk factors (waist circumference and levels of glycated hemoglobin, lipids [except high-density lipoprotein cholesterol], and alanine aminotransferase) were greater with semaglutide than with placebo. The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was greater with semaglutide than with placebo (62% vs. 42%). Five participants (4%) in the semaglutide group and no participants in the placebo group had cholelithiasis. Serious adverse events were reported in 15 of 133 participants (11%) in the semaglutide group and in 6 of 67 participants (9%) in the placebo group.ConclusionsAmong adolescents with obesity, once-weekly treatment with a 2.4-mg dose of semaglutide plus lifestyle intervention resulted in a greater reduction in BMI than lifestyle intervention alone. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; STEP TEENS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04102189.).