Dataset Information

Substrate specificity of bacterial endoribonuclease toxins.

ABSTRACT: Bacterial endoribonuclease toxins belong to a protein family that inhibits bacterial growth by degrading mRNA or rRNA sequences. The toxin genes are organized in pairs with its cognate antitoxins in the chromosome and thus the activities of the toxins are antagonized by antitoxin proteins or RNAs during active translation. In response to a variety of cellular stresses, the endoribonuclease toxins appear to be released from antitoxin molecules via proteolytic cleavage of antitoxin proteins or preferential degradation of antitoxin RNAs and cleave a diverse range of mRNA or rRNA sequences in a sequence-specific or codon-specific manner, resulting in various biological phenomena such as antibiotic tolerance and persister cell formation. Given that substrate specificity of each endoribonuclease toxin is determined by its structure and the composition of active site residues, we summarize the biology, structure, and substrate specificity of the updated bacterial endoribonuclease toxins. [BMB Reports 2020; 53(12): 611-621].

SUBMITTER: Han Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7781912 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Substrate specificity of bacterial endoribonuclease toxins.

Han Yoontak Y Lee Eun-Jin EJ

BMB reports 20201201 12

Bacterial endoribonuclease toxins belong to a protein family that inhibits bacterial growth by degrading mRNA or rRNA sequences. The toxin genes are organized in pairs with its cognate antitoxins in the chromosome and thus the activities of the toxins are antagonized by antitoxin proteins or RNAs during active translation. In response to a variety of cellular stresses, the endoribonuclease toxins appear to be released from antitoxin molecules via proteolytic cleavage of antitoxin proteins or pre ...[more]

PMID: 33148377

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Understanding the diversity of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes in nature will provide insights for the improvement of cellulolytic enzyme cocktails used in the biofuels industry. Two families of enzymes, fungal AA9 and bacterial AA10, have recently been characterized as crystalline cellulose or chitin-cleaving lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs). Here we analyze the sequences, structures, and evolution of LPMOs to understand the factors that may influence substrate specificity both within and between these enzyme families. RESULTS:Comparative analysis of sequences, solved structures, and homology models from AA9 and AA10 LPMO families demonstrated that, although these two LPMO families are highly conserved, structurally they have minimal sequence similarity outside the active site residues. Phylogenetic analysis of the AA10 family identified clades with putative chitinolytic and cellulolytic activities. Estimation of the rate of synonymous versus non-synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) within two major AA10 subclades showed distinct selective pressures between putative cellulolytic genes (subclade A) and CBP21-like chitinolytic genes (subclade D). Estimation of site-specific selection demonstrated that changes in the active sites were strongly negatively selected in all subclades. Furthermore, all codons in the subclade D had dN/dS values of less than 0.7, whereas codons in the cellulolytic subclade had dN/dS values of greater than 1.5. Positively selected codons were enriched at sites localized on the surface of the protein adjacent to the active site. CONCLUSIONS:The structural similarity but absence of significant sequence similarity between AA9 and AA10 families suggests that these enzyme families share an ancient ancestral protein. Combined analysis of amino acid sites under Darwinian selection and structural homology modeling identified a subclade of AA10 with diversifying selection at different surfaces, potentially used for cellulose-binding and protein-protein interactions. Together, these data indicate that AA10 LPMOs are under selection to change their function, which may optimize cellulolytic activity. This work provides a phylogenetic basis for identifying and classifying additional cellulolytic or chitinolytic LPMOs.

Project description:We tested the activities of four predicated RNase H enzymes, including two RNase HI-type enzymes, in addition to RNase HII (RnhB) and RNase HIII (RnhC), on several RNA-DNA hybrid substrates with different divalent metal cations. We found that the two RNase HI-type enzymes, YpdQ and YpeP, failed to show activity on the three substrates tested. RNase HII and RNase HIII cleaved all the substrates tested, although the activity was dependent on the metal made available. We show that Bacillus subtilis RNase HII and RNase HIII are both able to incise 5' to a single ribonucleoside monophosphate (rNMP). We show that RNase HIII incision at a single rNMP occurs most efficiently with Mn2+, an activity we found to be conserved among other Gram-positive RNase HIII enzymes. Characterization of RNases HII and HIII with metal concentrations in the physiological range showed that RNase HII can cleave at single rNMPs embedded in DNA while RNase HIII is far less effective. Further, using metal concentrations within the physiological range, RNase HIII efficiently cleaved longer RNA-DNA hybrids lacking an RNA-DNA junction, while RNase HII was much less effective. Phenotypic analysis showed that cells with an rnhC deletion were sensitive to hydroxyurea (HU). In contrast, cells with an rnhB deletion showed wild-type growth in the presence of HU, supporting the hypothesis that RNases HII and HIII have distinct substrate specificities in vivo This work demonstrates how metal availability influences the substrate recognition and activity of RNases HII and HIII, providing insight into their functions in vivo IMPORTANCE RNase H represents a class of proteins that cleave RNA-DNA hybrids, helping resolve R-loops and Okazaki fragments, as well as initiating the process of ribonucleotide excision repair (RER). We investigated the activities of four Bacillus subtilis RNase H enzymes and found that only RNases HII and HIII have activity and that their substrate preference is dependent on metal availability. To understand the factors that contribute to RNase HII and RNase HIII substrate preference, we show that in the presence of metal concentrations within the physiological range, RNases HII and HIII have distinct activities on different RNA-DNA hybrids. This work provides insight into how RNases HII and HIII repair the broad range of RNA-DNA hybrids that form in Gram-positive bacteria.

Dataset Information

Substrate specificity of bacterial endoribonuclease toxins.

Publications

Substrate specificity of bacterial endoribonuclease toxins.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets