Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comprehensive cross-platform comparison of methods for non-invasive EGFR mutation testing: results of the RING observational trial.


ABSTRACT: Several platforms for noninvasive EGFR testing are currently used in the clinical setting with sensitivities ranging from 30% to 100%. Prospective studies evaluating agreement and sources for discordant results remain lacking. Herein, seven methodologies including two next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based methods, three high-sensitivity PCR-based platforms, and two FDA-approved methods were compared using 72 plasma samples, from EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients progressing on a first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). NGS platforms as well as high-sensitivity PCR-based methodologies showed excellent agreement for EGFR-sensitizing mutations (K = 0.80-0.89) and substantial agreement for T790M testing (K = 0.77 and 0.68, respectively). Mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) obtained by different quantitative methods showed an excellent reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.86-0.98). Among other technical factors, discordant calls mostly occurred at mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) ? 0.5%. Agreement significantly improved when discarding samples with MAF ? 0.5%. EGFR mutations were detected at significantly lower MAFs in patients with brain metastases, suggesting that these patients risk for a false-positive result. Our results support the use of liquid biopsies for noninvasive EGFR testing and highlight the need to systematically report MAFs.

SUBMITTER: Romero A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7782072 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comprehensive cross-platform comparison of methods for non-invasive EGFR mutation testing: results of the RING observational trial.

Romero Atocha A   Jantus-Lewintre Eloisa E   García-Peláez Beatriz B   Royuela Ana A   Insa Amelia A   Cruz Patricia P   Collazo Ana A   Pérez Altozano Javier J   Vidal Oscar Juan OJ   Diz Pilar P   Cobo Manuel M   Hernández Berta B   Vázquez Estevez Sergio S   Benítez Gretel G   Guirado Maria M   Majem Margarita M   Bernabé Reyes R   Ortega Ana Laura AL   Blasco Ana A   Bosch-Barrera Joaquim J   Jurado Jose M JM   García González Jorge J   Viteri Santiago S   Garcia Giron Carlos C   Massutí Bartomeu B   Lopez Martín Ana A   Rodriguez-Festa Alejandro A   Calabuig-Fariñas Silvia S   Molina-Vila Miguel Ángel MÁ   Provencio Mariano M  

Molecular oncology 20201113 1


Several platforms for noninvasive EGFR testing are currently used in the clinical setting with sensitivities ranging from 30% to 100%. Prospective studies evaluating agreement and sources for discordant results remain lacking. Herein, seven methodologies including two next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based methods, three high-sensitivity PCR-based platforms, and two FDA-approved methods were compared using 72 plasma samples, from EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients progressin  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4977654 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4102953 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6295039 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5605948 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9600153 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8070308 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4612522 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7970584 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3894255 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4162576 | biostudies-literature