Dataset Information

Clinicopathological features and differential diagnosis of gastrofibromatosis-like undifferentiated carcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To study the clinicopathological features and differential diagnosis of gastrofibromatosis-like undifferentiated carcinoma (GFLUC).

Methods

Three patients with GFLUC underwent histological and immunophenotypic analyses and fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) gene amplification.

Results

Among the three patients (2 male [36 and 44 years old], 1 female [58 years old]), two had lesions in the gastric body and one had lesions in the gastric antrum. Histological analysis revealed mixtures of aggressive fibromatosis and undifferentiated carcinoma in all three cases. Highly invasive fibromatous tissue, consisting of fibroblasts, proliferating myofibroblasts, and collagenous fibrous tissues, accounted for >90% of the tumor, with undifferentiated cancerous tissue accounting for <10% scattered in the gaps within the invasive fibromatous tissue, with no glandular ducts or nests. Immunophenotypic analysis showed that the undifferentiated cancerous cells were positive for pan-cytokeratin, CDX2, villin, and p53, while the cytoplasm of invasive fibromatous cells was positive for vimentin, ?-catenin, and smooth muscle actin. No HER2 gene amplification was detected.

Conclusions

Unlike other gastric carcinomas, GFLUC shows specific histological, biological, and immunophenotypic characteristics.

SUBMITTER: Zhang Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7783894 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinicopathological features and differential diagnosis of gastrofibromatosis-like undifferentiated carcinoma.

Zhang Zhishang Z Zhao Guang G Jiang Bo B Li Baohui B Wang Yangkun Y

The Journal of international medical research 20201201 12

<h4>Objective</h4>To study the clinicopathological features and differential diagnosis of gastrofibromatosis-like undifferentiated carcinoma (GFLUC).<h4>Methods</h4>Three patients with GFLUC underwent histological and immunophenotypic analyses and fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridization to detect human epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>HER2</i>) gene amplification.<h4>Results</h4>Among the three patients (2 male [36 and 44 years old], 1 female [58 years old]), two had lesions in the gastric ...[more]

PMID: 33373269

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) complex is an evolutionarily conserved chromatin remodeling complex that displays dysfunction in many tumors, especially undifferentiated carcinoma. Cancer stem cells (CSC), a special type of undifferentiated cancer cells with stem cell-like properties, play an essential role in tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. In undifferentiated gastric carcinomas, the association of SWI/SNF complexes with clinicopathological features, CSC phenotype, and the prognosis is not fully understood.MethodsWe collected a cohort of 21 patients with undifferentiated/dedifferentiated gastric carcinoma. We next performed immunohistochemistry staining for the five subunits of the SWI/SNF complex (ARID1A, ARID1B, SMARCA2, SMARCA4, and SMARCB1), and four mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6), as well as other markers such as p53, PD-L1, and cancer stem cell (CSC) markers (SOX2, SALL4). Then, we investigated the correlation of SWI/SNF complex subunits with clinicopathological characters and performed prognostic analysis.ResultsWe observed SMARCA2 loss in 12 cases (57.14%), followed by ARID1A (5 cases, 23.81%) and SMARCA4 (3 cases, 14.29%). Fourteen cases (66.67%) lost any one of the SWI/SNF complex subunits, including 3 cases with SMARCA2 and ARID1A co-loss, and 3 cases with SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 co-loss. Correlation analysis revealed that the CSC phenotype occurred more frequently in the SWI/SNF complex deficient group (P = 0.0158). Survival analysis revealed that SWI/WNF complex deficiency, undifferentiated status, CSC phenotype, and the loss of SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 resulted in worse survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses screened out three independent factors associated with worse prognosis: undifferentiated status, SWI/SNF complex deficiency, and lymph node metastasis.ConclusionsThe SWI/SNF complex deficiency was more likely to result in a CSC phenotype and worse survival and was an independent prognostic factor in undifferentiated/dedifferentiated gastric carcinoma.

Project description:BackgroundMicroRNA (miRNA) expression is known to be deregulated in ovarian carcinomas. However, limited data is available about the miRNA expression pattern for the benign or borderline ovarian tumors as well as differential miRNA expression pattern associated with histological types, grades or clinical stages in ovarian carcinomas. We defined patterns of microRNA expression in tissues from normal, benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumors and explored the relationship between frequently deregulated miRNAs and clinicopathologic findings, response to therapy, survival, and association with Her-2/neu status in ovarian carcinomas.MethodsWe measured the expression of nine miRNAs (miR-181d, miR-30a-3p, miR-30c, miR-30d, miR-30e-3p, miR-368, miR-370, miR-493-5p, miR-532-5p) in 171 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovarian tissue blocks as well as six normal human ovarian surface epithelial (HOSE) cell lines using Taqman-based real-time PCR assays. Her-2/neu overexpression was assessed in ovarian carcinomas (n = 109 cases) by immunohistochemistry analysis.ResultsExpression of four miRNAs (miR-30c, miR-30d, miR-30e-3p, miR-370) was significantly different between carcinomas and benign ovarian tissues as well as between carcinoma and borderline tissues. An additional three miRNAs (miR-181d, miR-30a-3p, miR-532-5p) were significantly different between borderline and carcinoma tissues. Expression of miR-532-5p was significantly lower in borderline than in benign tissues. Among ovarian carcinomas, expression of four miRNAs (miR-30a-3p, miR-30c, miR-30d, miR-30e-3p) was lowest in mucinous and highest in clear cell samples. Expression of miR-30a-3p was higher in well-differentiated compared to poorly differentiated tumors (P = 0.02), and expression of miR-370 was higher in stage I/II compared to stage III/IV samples (P = 0.03). In multivariate analyses, higher expression of miR-181d, miR-30c, miR-30d, and miR-30e-3p was associated with significantly better disease-free or overall survival. Finally, lower expression of miR-30c, miR-30d, miR-30e-3p and miR-532-5p was significantly associated with overexpression of Her-2/neu.ConclusionsAberrant expression of miRNAs is common in ovarian tumor suggesting involvement of miRNA in ovarian tumorigenesis. They are associated with histology, clinical stage, survival and oncogene expression in ovarian carcinoma.

Project description:ObjectivesGastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) is a class of rare histological subtypes in gastric cancer (GC). This retrospective case-control study aimed to explore the clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) of patients with GNEC.MethodsA large population of GNEC and intestinal-type GC (IGC) patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was initiated to adjust the confounders between GNEC and IGC cohorts. Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots with log-rank tests were used to compare the survival differences in GNEC versus IGC. Additionally, Cox proportional hazard regression models were adopted to characterize the prognostic factors relevant to OS of the GNEC patients.ResultsAn entity of 4596 patients were collected, including 3943 (85.8%) IGC patients and 653 (14.2%) GNEC patients. The PSM analysis well-balanced all confounders in GNEC versus IGC (all P > .05). The KM plots showed that GNEC had significantly superior OS to IGC both before and after PSM analysis. Before PSM, the median OS was 52 (33.6-70.4) months in GNEC versus 32 (29.3-34.7) months in IGC (P = .0015). After PSM, the median OS was 26 (18.3-33.7) months in GNEC versus 21 (17.7-24.3) months in IGC (P = .0039). Stratified analysis indicated that GNEC had superior survivals to IGC in early stage patients and those who received surgery. In Cox regression analysis, age ≥ 60, tumor size > 50 mm, stage II-IV, T2, and N3 were independent risk factors for the GNEC patients (hazard ratio [HR]>1, P < .05). By contrast, year 2010 to 2015, female, and surgery were independent protective factors for these patients (HR < 1, P < .05).ConclusionsGNEC has unique clinicopathological features quite different from IGC and may have a superior survival to IGC in early stage patients. The prognostic factors identified here may assist the clinicians to more individually treat these patients.

Dataset Information

Clinicopathological features and differential diagnosis of gastrofibromatosis-like undifferentiated carcinoma.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Clinicopathological features and differential diagnosis of gastrofibromatosis-like undifferentiated carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets