Dataset Information

Post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast reconstruction: a patterns of care study of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The details of breast reconstruction and radiation therapy (RT) vary between institutions; therefore, we sought to investigate the practice patterns of radiation oncologists who specialize in breast cancer.

Materials and methods

We identified the practice patterns and inter-hospital variations from a multi-center cohort of women with breast cancer who underwent post-mastectomy RT (PMRT) to the reconstructed breast at 16 institutions between 2015 and 2016. The institutions were requested to contour the target volume and produce RT plans for one representative case with five different clinical scenarios and answer questionnaires which elicited infrastructural information. We assessed the inter-institutional variations in RT in terms of the target, normal organ delineation, and dose-volume histograms.

Results

Three hundred fourteen patients were included; 99% of them underwent immediate reconstruction. The most irradiated material was tissue expander (36.9%) followed by transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (23.9%) and silicone implant (12.1%). In prosthetic-based reconstruction with tissue expander, most patients received PMRT following partial deflation. Conventional fractionation and hypofractionation RT were used in 66.6% and 33.4% patients, respectively (commonest: 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions [17.5%]). Furthermore, 15.6% of the patients received boost RT and 53.5% were treated with bolus. Overall, 15 physicians responded to the questionnaires and six submitted their contours and RT plans. There was a significant variability in target delineations and RT plans between physicians, and between clinical scenarios.

Conclusion

Adjuvant RT following post-mastectomy reconstruction has become a common practice in Korea. The details vary significantly between institutions, which highlights an urgent need for standard protocol in this clinical setting.

SUBMITTER: Yang G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7785842 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast reconstruction: a patterns of care study of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group.

Yang Gowoon G Chang Jee Suk JS Shin Kyung Hwan KH Kim Jin Ho JH Park Won W Kim Haeyoung H Kim Kyubo K Lee Ik Jae IJ Yoon Won Sup WS Cha Jihye J Lee Kyu-Chan KC Kim Jin Hee JH Choi Jin Hwa JH Ahn Sung-Ja SJ Ha Boram B Lee Sun Young SY Lee Dong Soo DS Lee Jeongshim J Shin Sei One SO Kim Yong Bae YB

Radiation oncology journal 20201216 4

<h4>Purpose</h4>The details of breast reconstruction and radiation therapy (RT) vary between institutions; therefore, we sought to investigate the practice patterns of radiation oncologists who specialize in breast cancer.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We identified the practice patterns and inter-hospital variations from a multi-center cohort of women with breast cancer who underwent post-mastectomy RT (PMRT) to the reconstructed breast at 16 institutions between 2015 and 2016. The institutions ...[more]

PMID: 33389980

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe goal of this study was to explore the perspectives and practice of radiation oncologists who treat breast cancer patients who have had breast reconstruction.MethodsIn 2010, an original electronic survey was sent to all physician members of the American Society of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Research Institute-Breast Cancer Studies Group in the United Kingdom, Thai Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Swiss Society of Radiation Oncology, and Turkish Radiation Oncology Society. We identified factors associated with radiation oncologists who treat breast cancer patients with reconstruction performed prior to radiation and obtained information regarding radiation management of the breast reconstruction.Results358 radiation oncologists responded, and 60% of the physicians were from the United States. While 64% of participants agree or strongly agree that breast image affects a woman's quality of life during radiation, 57% feel that reconstruction challenges their ability to deliver effective breast radiation. Compared with other countries, treatment within the United States was associated with a high reconstruction rate (>/= 50% of mastectomy patients) prior to radiation (p < 0.05). Delayed-immediate reconstruction with a temporary tissue expander was more common in the United States than in other countries (52% vs. 23%, p = 0.01). Among physicians who treat patients with tissue expanders, the majority (60%) prefer a moderately inflated implant with 150-250 cc of fluid rather than a completely deflated (13%) or inflated expander (28%) during radiation. Among radiation oncologists who treat reconstructions, 49% never use bolus and 40% never boost a breast reconstruction. United States physicians were more likely than physicians from other countries to boost or bolus the reconstruction irrespective of the type of reconstruction seen in their clinic patients (p < 0.01).ConclusionsGreat variation in practice is evident from our study of radiation treatment for breast cancer patients with reconstruction. Further research on the impact and delivery of radiation to a reconstructed breast may validate some of the observed practices, highlight the variability in treatment practice, and help create a treatment consensus.

Project description:BackgroundThe risk factors for breast implant reconstruction complications and prosthetic reconstruction failure are currently inconclusive. Besides, there is a lack of studies regarding the relationship between radiation dose distribution and complications. This study explored the risk factors for breast implant reconstruction complications and analyzed the influence of radiation dose distribution on complications.MethodsPatients undergoing breast prosthesis reconstruction between January 2012 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, treatments, and perioperative factors were recorded, as well as complications and prosthetic reconstruction failures. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore the risk factors of reconstruction complications and prosthesis reconstruction failure. The radiation dose distribution was obtained by examining the dose-volume histogram and compared among patients with and without complications.ResultsTwo hundred and sixteen patients (221 reconstructions) were not irradiated, whereas 59 (59 reconstructions) received radiotherapy (RT). The median follow-up period was 47.7 months. Multivariate regression analysis showed that RT [odds ratio (OR) =2.000; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.065-3.754; P=0.031] and chemotherapy (OR =2.226; 95% CI: 1.032-4.799; P=0.041) were independent risk factors for overall reconstruction complications; and hypertension (HT) (OR =8.222; 95% CI: 1.056-64.034; P=0.044) or RT (OR =2.442; 95% CI: 1.009-5.908; P=0.048) were risk factors for prosthetic reconstruction failure. There was a statistically significant difference in the radiation dose distribution between patients with and those without complications. Patients with complications had a significantly higher mean dose of 5 or 10 cc around the maximum radiation dose in the planning target volume (PTV) (P=0.045 and P=0.034, respectively), irradiation volume with a dose of 107% of prescription dose (P=0.027), and proportion of irradiation volume with doses of 105% and 107% of prescription dose to the total PTV (P=0.019 and P=0.042, respectively).ConclusionsRT can increase implant reconstruction complications and prosthetic reconstruction failure, but remains an acceptable option in a multidisciplinary setting. In addition to RT, chemotherapy is a risk factor for overall complications of breast implant reconstruction. HT is a risk factor for prosthetic reconstruction failure, so the patient's blood pressure should be actively monitored and controlled during the perioperative period. The radiation dose level and the volume with high-dose radiation should be limited to reduce complications.

Project description:BackgroundRobotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM) has emerged as a new treatment option for breast cancer and risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) for women who have a high risk of pathogenic variants. Even though several studies have reported that RNSM is a feasible procedure, some argue that it should only be performed by specialized surgeons, and data on oncologic outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are limited. Recently, the United States Food and Drug Administration and several surgeons warned that robotic breast surgery should be performed only by specialized surgeons and recommended that the benefits, risks, and alternatives of all available treatment options be discussed with patients so they can make informed treatment decisions. The Korea Robot-Endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group (KoREa-BSG) has been established to evaluate, standardize, and teach this state-of-the-art procedure. We have designed a multicenter prospective cohort study entitled Mastectomy with Reconstruction Including Robot Endoscopic Surgery (MARRES) to report surgical, PRO, and oncologic outcomes.MethodsMARRES is a multi-institution cohort study prospectively collecting data from patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction. The patient inclusion criteria are adult women older than 19 with breast cancer or a high risk of breast cancer (patients with BRCA1/2, TP53, PALB2 mutations, etc.), who have scheduled therapeutic or RRM and want immediate reconstruction. Surgical outcomes, including pre- and postoperative photos, oncologic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and PRO, are collected. The primary endpoints are postoperative complication rates within 30 postoperative days and the Clavien-Dindo grade of postoperative complications within 180 postoperative days. The secondary endpoints are 5-year postoperative recurrence-free survival and cancer incidence rate (for those who underwent RRM), patient satisfaction with reconstruction expectations preoperative (baseline) and results within 6 to 12 postoperative months, surgeon satisfaction with postoperative results in 6 postoperative months, and cost-effectiveness of the definitive surgery. Patient recruitment will be completed in April 2025, and the target number of enrolled patients is 2000.DiscussionThis study will provide evidence about the surgical outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and patient satisfaction with RNSM and endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), compared with conventional NSM.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04585074. Registered April 8, 2020.

Dataset Information

Post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast reconstruction: a patterns of care study of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group.

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast reconstruction: a patterns of care study of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets