Dataset Information

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive septic shock: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

We evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture-positive septic shock.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study of data from a prospective registry from 2014 to 2018. A total of 2,499 adult patients with septic shock were enrolled. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, a requirement for mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy, and in-hospital mortality.

Results

Of 1,718 patients with septic shock, 1,012 (58.9%) patients were culture-positive (blood 803, urine 302, sputum 102, others 204) and the median pathogen detection time was 9.5 h (aerobic 10.2 h and anaerobic 9.0 h). The most common site of culture-positive infection was the hepatobiliary tract (39.5%), while for the culture-negative it was the lower respiratory tract (38.2%). The culture-negative group had a lower mean body temperature (37.3 vs 37.7 ℃), lactate (2.5 vs. 3.2 mmol/L), C-reactive protein (11.1 vs 11.9 mg/dL), and sequential organ failure assessment score (7.0 vs. 8.0) than that of the culture-positive group. However, 90-day mortality between the groups was not significantly different (32.7 vs 32.2%, p = 0.83), and the other clinical outcomes also did not differ significantly. Moreover, a shorter culture detection time was correlated with a higher sequential organ failure assessment score but not with mortality.

Conclusion

Patients with septic shock are frequently culture-negative, especially in cases where the infection focus is in the lower respiratory tract. Although culture-negative was associated with a degree of organ dysfunction, it was not an independent predictor of death.

SUBMITTER: Kim JS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7787242 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive septic shock: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Kim June-Sung JS Kim Youn-Jung YJ Kim Won Young WY

Critical care (London, England) 20210106 1

<h4>Background</h4>We evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture-positive septic shock.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a retrospective observational study of data from a prospective registry from 2014 to 2018. A total of 2,499 adult patients with septic shock were enrolled. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, a requirement for mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy, and in-hospital mor ...[more]

PMID: 33407768

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWe assessed the outcomes and characteristics of culture-negative septic shock (CNSS) and culture-positive septic shock (CPSS) in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).MethodsWe performed a retrospective study on the data of children admitted to the PICU due to septic shock between January 2018 and December 2021. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were the length of stay (LOS) of hospital, the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) and continue renal replacement therapy (CRRT).ResultsOverall, 238 patients were enrolled. 114 patients (47.9%) had positive cultures (60 blood samples, 41 sputum samples, 17 pus samples, and 19 others), 18 of whom were cultured positive at two sites, 1 at three sites, and 3 had two different types of bacteria at same site. The in-hospital mortality was 47.1%. There were no significant differences in the in-hospital mortality (47.6% vs. 46.5%, P = 0.866), PRISM-III score (10 vs. 12, P = 0.409), PIM-3 score (0.08 vs. 0.07, P = 0.845), pSOFA score (10 vs. 10, P = 0.677) or the need for MV (64.5% vs. 68.4%, P = 0.524) and CRRT (29.8% vs. 34.2%, P = 0.470) between the CNSS group and the CPSS group. The Procalcitonin (8.89 ng/ml vs. 28.39 ng/ml, P = 0.001) and C-reactive protein (28 mg/L vs. 58 mg/L, P = 0.001) levels were significantly lower in the CNSS group than in the CPSS group, while WBC count (9.03 × 109/L vs. 5.02 × 109/L, P = 0.002) and serum sodium (137 mmol/L vs. 132 mmol/L, P = 0.001) was significantly higher in CNSS. The LOS of hospital was significantly longer (16 days vs. 11 days, P = 0.011) in the CPSS group than in the CNSS group, while the LOS of PICU (5 days vs. 4 days, P = 0.094) stay was not significantly different.ConclusionCompared with children with CNSS, children with CPSS had higher PCT and CRP levels, but lower WBC count. Children with CPSS had longer LOS of hospital. However, positive or negative culture results were not associated with in-hospital mortality, the LOS of PICU, the need for MV or CRRT in children with septic shock.

Project description:BackgroundThe proposed definition of septic shock in the Sepsis-3 consensus statement has been previously validated in critically ill patients. However, the subset of critically ill patients with sepsis and positive blood cultures needs further evaluation. To compare the combined (old and new septic shock) versus old definition of septic shock in sepsis patients that have positive blood cultures and are critically ill.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of adult patients (age ≥18 years), who had evidence of positive blood cultures, requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission at a large tertiary care academic center from January 2009 through October 2015. Eligible subjects who opted out of research participation, those requiring intensive care admission after elective surgery, and those who were deemed to have a low probability of infection were excluded. Basic demographics data, clinical and laboratory parameters, and outcomes of interest were pulled from the validated institutional database/repository and contrasted between the patients who qualified the new and old definitions criteria (combined) of septic shock versus the group meeting the old septic shock criteria only.ResultsWe included a total of 477 patients in the final analysis who qualified for old and new septic shock definitions. For the entire cohort, median age was 65.6 (IQR, 55-75) years, with male predominance (N=258, 54%). When compared to patients in the group who only met the old definition (N=206), the patients who met the combined (new or both new and old, N=271) definition had a higher APACHE III scores, 92 (IQR, 76-112) vs. 76 (IQR, 61-95), P<0.001; a higher SOFA day-1 score of 10 (IQR, 8-13) vs. 7 (IQR, 4-10), P<0.001, but did not differ significantly in age 65.5 years (IQR, 55-74) vs. 66 years (IQR, 55-76) years, P=0.47. The patients who met the combined (new or both new and old) definition had higher chances of having conservative resuscitation preferences (DNI/DNR); 77 (28.4) vs. 22 (10.7), P<0.001. The same group also had worse outcomes in terms of hospital mortality (34.3% vs. 18%, P<0.001) and standardized mortality ratio (0.76 vs. 0.52, P<0.04).ConclusionsIn patients with sepsis with positive blood cultures, the group of patients meeting the combined definition (new or both new and old) have higher severity of illness, higher mortality, and a worse standardized mortality ratio as compared to patients meeting the old definition of septic shock.

Project description:BackgroundThe primary objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of culture-positive and culture-negative status in septic patients. We also determined whether culture status is associated with mortality and whether unique variables are associated with mortality in culture-positive and culture-negative patients separately.MethodsUtilizing patient records from intensive care units, emergency department, and general care wards in a large academic medical center, we identified adult patients with suspected infection and ≥2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria between January 1, 2007, and May 31, 2014. We compared the characteristics between culture-positive and culture-negative patients and used binary logistic regression to identify variables independently associated with culture status and mortality. We also did sensitivity analyses using patients with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria for sepsis.ResultsThe study population included 9288 culture-negative patients (89%) and 1105 culture-positive patients (11%). Culture-negative patients received more antibiotics during the 48 hours preceding diagnosis but otherwise demonstrated similar characteristics as culture-positive patients. After adjusting for illness severity, a positive culture was not independently associated with mortality (odds ratio = 1.01 [95% CI, 0.81-1.26]; P = .945). The models predicting mortality separately in culture-negative and culture-positive patients demonstrated very good and excellent discrimination (C-statistic ± SD, 0.87 ± 0.01 and 0.92 ± 0.01), respectively. In the sensitivity analyses using patients with sepsis by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria, after adjustments for illness severity, positive cultures were still not associated with mortality (odds ratio = 1.13 [95% CI, 0.86-1.43]; P = .303; and odds ratio = 1.05 [95% CI, 0.83-1.33]; P = .665), respectively. In all models, physiological derangements were associated with mortality.ConclusionsWhile culture status is important for tailoring antibiotics, culture-negative and culture-positive patients with sepsis demonstrate similar characteristics and, after adjusting for severity of illness, similar mortality. The most important factor associated with negative cultures is receipt of antibiotics during the preceding 48 hours. The risk of death in patients suspected of having an infection is most associated with severity of illness. This is aligned with the Sepsis-3 definition using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score to better identify those suspected of infection at highest risk of a poor outcome.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with septic shock have the highest risk of death from sepsis, however, racial disparities in mortality outcomes in this cohort have not been rigorously investigated. Our objective was to describe the association between race/ethnicity and mortality in patients with septic shock.MethodsOur study is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients in the OneFlorida Data Trust (Florida, United States of America) admitted with septic shock between January 2012 and July 2018. We identified patients as having septic shock if they received vasopressors during their hospital encounter and had either an explicit International Classification of Disease (ICD) code for sepsis, or had an infection ICD code and received intravenous antibiotics. Our primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Our secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multiple logistic regression with Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) for variable selection was used to assess associations.FindingsThere were 13,932 patients with septic shock in our cohort. The mean age was 61 years (SD 16), 68% of the cohort identified as White (n = 9419), 28% identified as Black (n = 3936), 2% (n = 294) identified as Hispanic ethnicity, and 2% as other races not specified in the previous groups (n = 283). In our logistic regression model for 90-day mortality, patients identified as Black had 1.57 times the odds of mortality (95% CI 1.07-2.29, p = 0.02) compared to White patients. Other significant predictors included mechanical ventilation (OR 3.66, 95% CI 3.35-4.00, p < 0.01), liver disease (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.59-1.93, p < 0.01), laboratory components of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.16-1.21, p < 0.01), lactate (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.08-1.12, p < 0.01), congestive heart failure (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.30, p < 0.01), human immunodeficiency virus (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.04-1.75, p = 0.03), age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.04-1.04, p < 0.01), and the interaction between age and race (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, p < 0.01). Among younger patients (<45 years), patients identified as Black accounted for a higher proportion of the deaths. Results were similar in the in-hospital mortality model.InterpretationIn this retrospective study of septic shock patients, we found that patients identified as Black had higher odds of mortality compared to patients identified as non-Hispanic White. Our findings suggest that the greatest disparities in mortality are among younger Black patients with septic shock.FundingNational Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (1KL2TR001429); National Institute of Health National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1K23GM144802).

Project description:Evidence-based data regarding the timing of the application of invasive mechanical ventilation among adults with septic shock is insufficient. The guidelines fail to provide clear advice about the optimal time to initiate this support. Consequently, we aimed to investigate whether early intubation could improve survival rates in septic shock patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database to evaluate the effectiveness of early intubation on mortality in a cohort of septic shock patients. Adults diagnosed with septic shock, according to the Sepsis-3 definition, were included. They were categorized into an early intubation group (first 8 h after vasopressor initiation) and a non-early intubation group (unexposed). A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality rates. In addition, we employed the restricted cubic spline to analyze the potential non-linear relationship between the timing of intubation and 30-day or 90-day all-cause mortality. A total of 6864 adult patients, of whom 2048 were intubated in the first 8 h, were evaluated in the final cohort. Following a 1:1 PSM procedure, 2786 patients were successfully paired. At 30 days, 288 of 1393 patients (20.7%) in the early intubation group and 381 of 1393 patients (27.4%) in the non-early intubation group had died (hazard ratio [HR] 0.717; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.616-0.836; p < 0.001). Similarly, the results also showed that early intubation was associated with a lower 90 day all-cause mortality rate (HR 0.761; 95% CI 0.663-0.874; p < 0.001). Furthermore, ICU and hospital lengths of stay were significantly different between the groups (3.6 [1.9, 7.1] vs. 2.3 [1.3, 4.3]; p < 0.001 and 8.9 [5.4, 15.1] vs. 7.2 [4.5, 12.0]; p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, we further confirmed the robustness of our findings. Additionally, we found that the timing of intubation is inversely U-shaped correlated to the 30 day all-cause mortality rate. Among adult patients with septic shock, the early initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation could improve clinical outcomes. The timing of intubation demonstrated an inverse U-shaped association with the 30 day all-cause mortality rate, with the peak risk of death occurring at 50.5 h after septic shock.

Project description:PurposeIt is not clear whether vasopressin versus norepinephrine changed mortality in clinical practice in the Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial (VASST) coordinating center hospital after VASST was published. We tested the hypothesis that vasopressin changed mortality compared to norepinephrine using propensity matching of vasopressin to norepinephrine-treated patients in the VASST coordinating center hospital before (SPH1) and after (SPH2) VASST was published.MethodsVasopressin-treated patients were propensity score matched to norepinephrine-treated patients based on age, APACHE II, respiratory, renal, and hematologic dysfunction, mechanical ventilation status, medical/surgical status, infection site, and norepinephrine dose. The propensity score estimated the probability that a patient would have received vasopressin given baseline characteristics. For sensitivity analysis, we then excluded patients who had underlying severe congestive heart failure. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality.ResultsVasopressin- and norepinephrine-treated patients were similar after matching in SPH1 (pre-VASST); vasopressin-treated patients (n = 158) had a significantly higher mortality than norepinephrine-treated patients (n = 158) (60.8 vs. 46.2%, p = 0.009). In SPH2 after matching, the 28-day mortality rates were not significantly different; 31.2% and 26.9% in the vasopressin (n = 93) and norepinephrine (n = 93) groups, respectively (p = 0.518). The day 1 vasopressin dose in SPH1 vs. SPH2 was 0.036 units/min (SD 0.009) vs. 0.032 units/min (SD 0.005), p = 0.001, significantly lower in SPH2 after VASST.ConclusionsBefore VASST, vasopressin use was associated with increased mortality compared to norepinephrine in the VASST coordinating center hospital. After VASST, there was no difference in mortality between vasopressin- and norepinephrine-treated patients. This may be the first retrospective propensity-matched cohort study of a sepsis treatment in a center that had previously coordinated a large pivotal randomized controlled trial of that treatment and could be a useful approach for other sepsis therapies.Trial registrationRegistration: ISRCTN94845869.

Project description:BackgroundSevere sepsis/septic shock with severe neutropenia often leads to poor prognosis. However, it is unknown if severe neutropenia is associated with different clinical outcomes and biomarker features in severe sepsis/septic patients.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study enrolled 141 severe sepsis/septic shock patients admitted to intensive care unit of Shanghai Children's Medical Center between January 2015 and November 2019. Patients were followed up for the development of ventilation support, the use of vasoactive drugs, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) procedure, and mortality. Biomarkers that reflect the level of inflammation in severe sepsis/septic shock patients with neutropenia were compared to that in patients without neutropenia.ResultsOf 141 patients enrolled, 54 patients suffered from severe sepsis/septic shock with severe neutropenia. In patients with severe sepsis/septic shock, severe neutropenia as a complication was an independent risk factor for the use of vasoactive drugs (RR 9.796; 95% CI: 3.774, 25.429; P<0.001), but not for ventilation support (RR 0.157; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.414; P<0.001), CRRT procedure (RR 1.032; 95% CI: 0.359, 2.969; P=0.953) or 28-day mortality (RR 1.405; 95% CI: 0.533, 3.708; P=0.492). Severe sepsis/septic patients with severe neutropenia had a higher plasma level of the following biomarkers: c-reaction protein (CRP) (180.5 vs. 121 mg/mL, P<0.001), procalcitonin (PCT) (12.15 vs. 2.7 ng/mL; P=0.005), interleukin (IL)-6 (316.83 vs. 55.77 pg/mL, P<0.001), IL-10 (39.165 vs. 10.09 pg/mL, P<0.001), interferon (IFN)-γ (6.155 vs. 3.71 pg/mL, P=0.016), and the percentage of regulatory T cells (Tregs) (2.7% vs. 2.09%, P=0.003). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curves, IL-10 exhibited high specificity (79.4%) in evaluating the prognosis of septic patients with neutropenia.ConclusionsIn patients with severe sepsis/septic shock, being complicated with severe neutropenia is associated with higher proportion of using vasoactive drugs, and those patients tend to have higher plasma levels of IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ and percentage of Treg.

Project description:IntroductionData are sparse as to whether obesity influences the risk of death in critically ill patients with septic shock. We sought to examine the possible impact of obesity, as assessed by body mass index (BMI), on hospital mortality in septic shock patients.MethodsWe performed a nested cohort study within a retrospective database of patients with septic shock conducted in 28 medical centers in Canada, United States and Saudi Arabia between 1996 and 2008. Patients were classified according to the World Health Organization criteria for BMI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between obesity and hospital mortality.ResultsOf the 8,670 patients with septic shock, 2,882 (33.2%) had height and weight data recorded at ICU admission and constituted the study group. Obese patients were more likely to have skin and soft tissue infections and less likely to have pneumonia with predominantly Gram-positive microorganisms. Crystalloid and colloid resuscitation fluids in the first six hours were given at significantly lower volumes per kg in the obese and very obese patients compared to underweight and normal weight patients (for crystalloids: 55.0 ± 40.1 ml/kg for underweight, 43.2 ± 33.4 for normal BMI, 37.1 ± 30.8 for obese and 27.7 ± 22.0 for very obese). Antimicrobial doses per kg were also different among BMI groups. Crude analysis showed that obese and very obese patients had lower hospital mortality compared to normal weight patients (odds ratio (OR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.97 for obese and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.85 for very obese patients). After adjusting for baseline characteristics and sepsis interventions, the association became non-significant (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.02 for obese and OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.04 for very obese).ConclusionsThe obesity paradox (lower mortality in the obese) documented in other populations is also observed in septic shock. This may be related in part to differences in patient characteristics. However, the true paradox may lie in the variations in the sepsis interventions, such as the administration of resuscitation fluids and antimicrobial therapy. Considering the obesity epidemic and its impact on critical care, further studies are warranted to examine whether a weight-based approach to common therapeutic interventions in septic shock influences outcome.

Dataset Information

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive septic shock: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive septic shock: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets