Dataset Information

The Use of Local Perforator Flaps in Delayed or Secondary Breast Reconstruction.

ABSTRACT: Local perforator flaps are used as immediate volume replacement techniques in breast conserving surgery. Here, we describe a case series of local perforator flaps used in the delayed setting to correct defects following previous breast surgery, including previous breast conservation surgery or mastectomy with reconstruction. All cases were performed in a tertiary referral breast unit between 2014 and 2020. Cases were identified using a prospectively maintained database. Indications, type of perforator flap used, immediate post-operative complications, and longer term outcomes were recorded. Fifteen cases were identified: 8 following previous breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy, 6 following mastectomy and reconstruction, and 1 for developmental breast asymmetry following childhood radiotherapy. Indications included volume deficit, contour defect, asymmetry, and capsular contracture. One patient a major complication requiring return to theater due to implant-related infection. There were no flap losses. Longer term, 2 patients underwent lipomodeling to further augment breast volume as part of a planned, staged revision. One patient subsequently elected to have bilateral breast implant exchange to increase volume. Our series shows the versatility of local perforator flaps in the correction of complex breast defects that can occur following previous breast surgery. Delayed local perforator flaps are associated with low morbidity, and further revision surgery is not commonly required.

SUBMITTER: Quinn EM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7787289 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Use of Local Perforator Flaps in Delayed or Secondary Breast Reconstruction.

Quinn Edel Marie EM O'Ceallaigh Siobhan S Highton Lyndsey L Murphy John J

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 20201217 12

Local perforator flaps are used as immediate volume replacement techniques in breast conserving surgery. Here, we describe a case series of local perforator flaps used in the delayed setting to correct defects following previous breast surgery, including previous breast conservation surgery or mastectomy with reconstruction. All cases were performed in a tertiary referral breast unit between 2014 and 2020. Cases were identified using a prospectively maintained database. Indications, type of perf ...[more]

PMID: 33425582

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background & objectivesVarious oncoplastic techniques have emerged over the years to preserve breast cosmesis and symmetry without compromising the principles of tumor excision. One of the newer techniques for breast volume replacement to achieve symmetry and cosmesis is the use of fasciocutaneous pedicled chest wall perforator flaps or local perforator flaps (LPF). The objectives of this study were to document the details of the surgical procedure as well as patient-reported satisfaction and well-being following the procedure using a validated BREAST-Q tool among Pakistani women.Materials & methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2019 to February 2021 enrolling 25 female patients who underwent breast conservative surgery using LPF for breast tumors at The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi. Data related to the procedure was collected on a pre-designed proforma. Cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction were evaluated using 2 scales from BREAST-Q BCT domain version 2.0. The questionnaire was self-administered by the patients during their routine follow-up in the clinic. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. Mean (SD)/median (IQR) were computed for quantitative variables and frequency and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables. 2 sample t-test was applied. P-value ≤0.05 was considered significant.Results25 patients underwent LPF with a mean age of 47 ± 13.1 years. 8 LICAP, 7 AICAP, and 10 LTAP flaps were performed. Two postoperative complications of wound site erythema were encountered. 23 women were eligible for the BREAST-Q survey. Median (IQR) postoperative satisfaction with breasts and physical well-being chest (equivalent Rasch transformed score) was 100 (41) and 76 [18] respectively. We found high satisfaction with breasts and comparable physical well-being among Pakistani women after LPF surgeries.ConclusionLocal perforator flaps in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery are a good option showing high satisfaction with breasts and physical well-being in Pakistani women.

Project description:Background: Reconstruction with the use of perforator flaps makes it possible to make the skin surface resistant to the influence of mechanical factors and as similar to the lost skin cover as possible. However, while planning any flap, along with the design of the required shape and size, its blood supply should be taken into account to ensure optimal viability. Therefore, the task to precisely determine the topographic-anatomical relationships suitable for the formation of a pedicle of perforators is still relevant. The aim of this study was to increase the efficiency of surgical reconstruction of wound defects by transposition of locoregional perforator flaps. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 72 cases of reconstruction by means of locoregional perforator flaps with vascular pedicle detachment to determine the efficiency of preoperative diagnostic preparation with the help of multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography (MDCT) in the process of reconstruction. Thirty-seven individual cases of surgical interventions were chosen using a case-controlled study from the study group when MDCT with angiography was used for preoperative planning of perforator flaps, as well as 35 control cases similar in terms of important predictive peculiarities with the reconstruction at the same level of difficulty. The patient groups were precisely matched by gender (P = .950), age (P = .804), flap area (P = .192), and type of reconstruction that was performed. Results: In all cases, the location of the perforator with a diameter greater than 1.0 mm was marked. All perforators determined during MDCT scanning were faultlessly localized intraoperatively. The distance between the intraoperative position of the perforator and the position obtained in the result of the examination did not exceed 1 cm. There was no need to change the planned design of the flap intraoperatively. In all cases where MDCT was performed, the duration of the surgical procedure varied from 60 to 150 minutes (average: 120.77 [18.90] minutes) and was reduced by 49.40 minutes (95% CI: 39.17-59.63) compared with the patients who did not undergo preoperative visualization of perforators where the average duration of the operation was 170.17 (19.19) minutes (from 140 to 220 minutes). Among the patients examined by MDCT, surgical complications were noted in 5 cases (13.51%) compared to 14 cases (40.00%) in the control group. Conclusions: The preoperative MDCT for the locoregional perforator flap reconstruction makes it possible to increase the efficiency of patient treatment given the reduction in surgery duration by 49.40 minutes (95% CI: 39.17-59.63) on average and the reduction in the level of postsurgery complications from 40% to 13.5% compared with the group of patients in whom presurgical visualization was not performed (P = .031).

Dataset Information

The Use of Local Perforator Flaps in Delayed or Secondary Breast Reconstruction.

Publications

The Use of Local Perforator Flaps in Delayed or Secondary Breast Reconstruction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets