Dataset Information

80 questions for UK biological security.

ABSTRACT: Multiple national and international trends and drivers are radically changing what biological security means for the United Kingdom (UK). New technologies present novel opportunities and challenges, and globalisation has created new pathways and increased the speed, volume and routes by which organisms can spread. The UK Biological Security Strategy (2018) acknowledges the importance of research on biological security in the UK. Given the breadth of potential research, a targeted agenda identifying the questions most critical to effective and coordinated progress in different disciplines of biological security is required. We used expert elicitation to generate 80 policy-relevant research questions considered by participants to have the greatest impact on UK biological security. Drawing on a collaboratively-developed set of 450 questions, proposed by 41 experts from academia, industry and the UK government (consulting 168 additional experts) we subdivided the final 80 questions into six categories: bioengineering; communication and behaviour; disease threats (including pandemics); governance and policy; invasive alien species; and securing biological materials and securing against misuse. Initially, the questions were ranked through a voting process and then reduced and refined to 80 during a one-day workshop with 35 participants from a variety of disciplines. Consistently emerging themes included: the nature of current and potential biological security threats, the efficacy of existing management actions, and the most appropriate future options. The resulting questions offer a research agenda for biological security in the UK that can assist the targeting of research resources and inform the implementation of the UK Biological Security Strategy. These questions include research that could aid with the mitigation of Covid-19, and preparation for the next pandemic. We hope that our structured and rigorous approach to creating a biological security research agenda will be replicated in other countries and regions. The world, not just the UK, is in need of a thoughtful approach to directing biological security research to tackle the emerging issues.

SUBMITTER: Kemp L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7787535 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

80 questions for UK biological security.

Kemp Luke L Aldridge David C DC Booy Olaf O Bower Hilary H Browne Des D Burgmann Mark M Burt Austin A Cunningham Andrew A AA Dando Malcolm M Dick Jaimie T A JTA Dye Christopher C Weiss Evans Sam S Gallardo Belinda B Godfray H Charles J HCJ Goodfellow Ian I Gubbins Simon S Holt Lauren A LA Jones Kate E KE Kandil Hazem H Martin Phillip P McCaughan Mark M McLeish Caitríona C Meany Thomas T Millett Kathryn K ÓhÉigeartaigh Sean S SS Patron Nicola J NJ Rhodes Catherine C Roy Helen E HE Shackelford Gorm G Smith Derek D Spence Nicola N Steiner Helene H Sundaram Lalitha S LS Voeneky Silja S Walker John R JR Watkins Harry H Whitby Simon S Wood James J Sutherland William J WJ

PloS one 20210106 1

Multiple national and international trends and drivers are radically changing what biological security means for the United Kingdom (UK). New technologies present novel opportunities and challenges, and globalisation has created new pathways and increased the speed, volume and routes by which organisms can spread. The UK Biological Security Strategy (2018) acknowledges the importance of research on biological security in the UK. Given the breadth of potential research, a targeted agenda identify ...[more]

PMID: 33406134

Similar Datasets

Project description:Failed user authentication is a common event. Forgotten passwords and fingerprint non-recognition are the most common causes. Therefore, there is a need for efficient backup authentication methods, known as fallback authentication. However, fallback authentication methods suffer from different security and usability issues. This study aims to improve the security and usability of knowledge-based fallback authentication in the form of static security questions. The approach proposed in this study was designed considering different factors, such as question features, authentication mechanisms, and the use of tools to aid in composing memorable and secure answers. This study used a two-part experiment with 23 participants to evaluate the proposed approach based on security model testing. The results show that the proposed approach offered improved resistance to blind guess, focused guess, and observation guess attacks. While usability was clearly improved with questions that were based on recognition mechanisms, our results indicate that fallback authentication systems need a flexible level of security and avoidance of complexity in composing answers. In addition, our results indicate the effectiveness of using user behavioral details in the choice of topics for questions, where behavioral questions must have both high recall levels and resistance against guessing attacks. This work theoretically extends the knowledge of fallback authentication research by evaluating new security questions for fallback authentication considering replace of classical topics of security questions by introducing new topics of security questions based on user behavior and personal preferences. Also, this study applies methods of managing answers to security questions by encouraging users to compose answers based on free strict rules that inspire them to create strong and memorable answers based on their own rules. In addition, the findings of this study could support the deployment of knowledge-based authentication in fallback systems as a practical contribution to the user authentication field.

Project description:Background: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a major world health problem with over 400,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Despite advances in surgery and chemo-radiotherapy, the 5 year survival has remained roughly constant at approximately 50% for several decades. The disease is characterized by both clinical and genetic heterogeneity, so elucidating the molecular basis of this heterogeneity would have significant clinical implications. It is well recognized that OSCCs from Asia that are associated with betel quid chewing are phenotypically distinct from those from the West that are predominantly caused by smoking/drinking, but the genetic basis of these differences are largely unknown. The aim of this study is to examine the most related genetic factors, carcinogenic related pathways, and molecular processes that might be responsible for the phenotypic heterogeneity of OSCC between UK and Sri Lankan population groups. Methods: We have compared the gene expression profiles of OSCCs and normal oral mucosal tissues from both Sri Lankan and UK individuals using Affymetrix gene expression arrays. Results: The gene expression profiles of UK and Sri Lankan OSCC are similar in many respects to other oral cancer expression profiles reported in the literature and were mainly similar to each other. However, genes involved in tumor invasion, metastasis and recurrence were more obviously associated with UK tumors as opposed to those from Sri Lanka. Interestingly, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) revealed a highly activated cell-mediated immune response in both Sri Lankan normal and tumor samples relative to UK cohorts, which may, in part, explain the less aggressive behavior of these betel quid-induced OSCCs. Conclusion: The development of OSCCs in both UK and Sri Lankan populations appears largely mediated by similar biological pathways despite the differences related to race, ethnicity, lifestyle, and/or exposure to environmental carcinogens. However, IPA revealed a highly activated M-bM-^@M-^\Cell-mediated Immune ResponseM-bM-^@M-^] in Sri Lankan normal and tumor samples relative to UK cohorts. It seems likely, therefore, that any future attempts to personalize treatment for OSCC patients will need to be different in Western and Asian countries to reflect differences in gene expression and the immune status of the patients. All biopsy specimens of OSCC and normal oral mucosa were harvested with appropriate ethical approval and informed consent of individual patients (LREC 0769). Identical protocols for tissue collection and processing were used in both countries. OSCC samples were obtained from sequential incident cases treated by a single consultant surgeon from 2001 to 2004 at University Hospital of Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK, and Kandy General Hospital, Kandy, Sri Lanka. A total of 21 UK and 27 Sri Lankan samples yielded RNA of sufficient quality and quantity for microarray analysis. In addition, 8 normal oral mucosa specimens (five samples from UK & three samples from Sri Lankan population) were also profiled. All normal samples were from non-smokers, who did not chew betel quid and did not consume in excess of the national recommended weekly gender allowance of alcohol. Normal samples were taken from individuals with no history of cancer and had no first degree relatives with a history of cancer.

Dataset Information

80 questions for UK biological security.

Publications

80 questions for UK biological security.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets