Dataset Information

Forced and Voluntary Aerobic Cycling Interventions Improve Walking Capacity in Individuals With Chronic Stroke.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To determine the efficacy of high-intensity cycling to improve walking capacity in individuals with chronic stroke, identify variables that predict improvement in walking capacity, and quantify the relationship between the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) test variables.

Design

Secondary analysis of data from 2 randomized controlled trials.

Setting

Research laboratory.

Participants

Individuals with chronic stroke (N=43).

Interventions

Participants were randomized to 1 of the following time-matched interventions, occurring 3 times per week for 8 weeks: (1) forced aerobic exercise and upper extremity repetitive task practice (FE+RTP [n=16]), (2) voluntary aerobic exercise and upper extremity repetitive task practice (VE+RTP [n=14]), or (3) a non-aerobic control group (n=13).

Main outcome measure

Change in walking capacity as measured by the 6MWT from baseline to the end of treatment (EOT).

Results

Significant increases were observed in distance traveled during the 6MWT at the EOT compared with baseline in the FE+RTP (P<.001) and VE+RTP (P<.001) groups, but not in the control group (P=.21). Among aerobic exercise participants, a multivariate regression analysis revealed that cycling cadence, power output, and baseline 6MWT distance were significant predictors of change in walking capacity.

Conclusions

An 8-week aerobic cycling intervention prescribed at 60% to 80% of heart rate reserve and moderate to high cadence and resistance led to significant improvements in walking capacity in our cohort of individuals with chronic stroke. Individuals with low baseline walking capacity levels may benefit most from aerobic cycling to improve over ground locomotion. Although the 6MWT did not elicit a cardiorespiratory response comparable to the maximal exertion CPX test, the 6MWT can be considered a valid and clinically relevant submaximal test of cardiorespiratory function in individuals with chronic stroke.

SUBMITTER: Linder SM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7796862 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Previous treadmill exercise studies showing neuroprotective effects have raised questions as to whether exercise or the stress related to it may be key etiologic factors. In this study, we examined different exercise regimens (forced and voluntary exercise) and compared them with the effect of stress-only on stroke protection. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 65) were randomly assigned to treatment groups for 3 weeks. These groups included control, treadmill exercise, voluntary running wheel exercise, restraint, and electric shock. Levels of the stress hormone, corticosterone, were measured in the different groups using ELISA. Animals from each group were then subjected to stroke induced by a 2-h middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion followed by 48-h reperfusion. Infarct volume was determined in each group, while changes in gene expression of stress-induced heat shock proteins (Hsp) 27 and 70 were compared using real-time PCR between voluntary and treadmill exercise groups. The level of corticosterone was significantly higher in both stress (P < 0.05) and treadmill exercise (P < 0.05) groups, but not in the voluntary exercise group. Infarct volume was significantly reduced (P < 0.01) following stroke in rats exercised on a treadmill. However, the amelioration of damage was not duplicated in voluntary exercise, even though running distance in the voluntary exercise group was significantly (P < 0.01) longer than that of the forced exercise group (4,828 vs. 900 m). Furthermore, rats in the electric shock group displayed a significantly increased (P < 0.01) infarct volume. Expression of both Hsp 27 and Hsp 70 mRNA was significantly increased (P < 0.01) in the treadmill exercise group as compared with that in the voluntary exercise group. These results suggest that exercise with a stressful component, rather than either voluntary exercise or stress alone, is better able to reduce infarct volume. This exercise-induced neuroprotection may be attributable to up-regulation of stress-induced heat shock proteins 27 and 70.

Project description:IntroductionThe human hand is extremely involved in our daily lives. However, the rehabilitation of hand function after stroke can be rather difficult due to the complexity of hand structure and function, as well as neural basis that supports hand function. Specifically, in individuals with moderate to severe impairment following a stroke, previous evidence for effective treatments that recover hand function in this population is limited, and thus has never been reviewed. With the progress of rehabilitation science and tool development, results from more and more clinical trials are now available, thereby justifying conducting a systematic review.Methods and analysisThis systematic review protocol is consistent with the methodology recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Electronic searches will be carried out in the PubMed, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Cochrane Library databases, along with manual searches in the reference lists from included studies and published systematic reviews. The date range parameters used in searching all databases is between January 1999 and January 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English, with the primary outcome focusing on hand motor function, will be included. Two reviewers will screen all retrieved titles, abstracts and full texts, perform the evaluation of the risk bias and extract all data independently. The risk of bias of the included RCTs will be evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. A qualitative synthesis will be provided in text and table, to summarise the main results of the selected publications. A meta-analysis will be considered if there is sufficient homogeneity across outcomes. The quality of the included publications will be evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Ethics and disseminationNo ethical approval is needed, and the results of this review will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration numberCRD42019128285.